Chapter 4.2 and 5 Flashcards
Jello effect
the situation where a small change in one part of the organization requires
change and adjustment throughout the organization. E.g., in a matrix
configuration, a change in one function or project frequently requires adjustments
in a number of other functions and projects.
org complexity
The practical design questions relating to organizational complexity include: the width of specialization for the firm, the span of control for the firm, the delayering of the firm to eliminate middle management, the scope in a divisional configuration, and the limitation on the number of functions and divisions in the matrix configuration.
4 types of org complexity
blob, tall, flat, and symmetric
blob
low on vertical and horizontal differentiation
- if the firm does not formally divide its work into subunits;
- has little specialization of task;
- the firm can be quite flexible and quick to respond to ongoing changes;
- very loose or non-existent job descriptions;
- requires decision-making for new situations on a continuing basis, where the executive can become overloaded and not be able to give adequate attention to the activities;
- can also be confusing to customers or to newcomers who join the organization, since it is not clear who does what, or where one should go for specific types of information.
tall
low on horizontal differentiation and high on vertical differentiation
- the firm has a large middle management which focuses on information processing – taking directions and information from the top and making it precise for lower levels in the hierarchy; and taking detailed information from the bottom and summarizing and interpreting it for the top executives.
- the down and up processes involve a good deal of information processing which takes managerial time and can lead to delay;
- the span of control is limited as the information processing demands on the middle managers can be quite high;
- the inter-level vertical information transferal is usually large, involving frequent interaction of detailed information.
- if an additional function is added, it must be coordinated across all the functions;
- the addition of one more function increases the information processing demands nonlinearly. This limits the number of direct reports to a few; most firms have five to seven functions;
Recently, many firms have shortened their hierarchy, eliminating middle management levels in the firm. This is frequently called “delayering.” When a level is removed, the connections between the level above and the level below must also be changed.
flat
high on horizontal differentiation and low on vertical differentiation
- fewer middle managers (or subunits) to coordinate between the top executives and the lower levels in the organization;
- usually middle managers focus on resource allocation, general policy, and finance (other issues can be innovation, R&D, human resources – all of which involve policy and strategy);
- the information is aggregated and minimal;
- short-term information exchanges focus on financial goals and cash flows;
- long-term information exchanges focus on capital budgets and technology planning;
- the scope of the firm work across subunits can be quite varied, especially if there are no operational connections among them;
- the span of control can be wide if the focus of information flow is on policy, not detailed operations;
A major advantage: each unit has autonomy to focus on its own work. On the other hand, the executive level of the organization bears the burden of coordinating among these subunits, and they can get out of synch, lack coordination, leading to inefficiencies for the firm as a whole.
symmetric
high on horizontal differentiation and high on vertical differentiation
- the organization’s work is broken down into many task specialties as well as many vertical reporting levels;
- horizontally breaking down tasks into smaller tasks means that work can be done simultaneously in the horizontal subunits;
- helps to facilitate organizational effectiveness;
- a middle level (or perhaps multiple middle levels) are created that aggregate work from bottom to top and facilitate information flow from top to bottom;
- the information-processing requirements of the symmetric organization are very high because the coordination demands are high both horizontally and vertically throughout the firm.
blob fits
reactor strategy, calm environment, simple config
tall fits
efficiency goal,
defender strategy,
varied env,
functional config
flat fits
effectiveness goal,
prospector strategy,
locally stormy env,
divisional config
symmetric fits
both eff as goals,
analyzer with/without innovation,
turbulent env,
matrix config
Structures for spanning geography
The extent to which a firm locates based on optimal sourcing vs a particular geographic boundary, and the extent to which it locates to yield local responsiveness vs global standards and economies of scale.
Optimal sourcing
the decision to locate operations in the place in the world that brings the greatest advantage to the firm in terms of customer contract, cost efficiency, HR skill needed, or other objective.
Local responsiveness
the decision to distribute work in many locales versus consolidating work in one or a few centralized locations. Distributing work to many locales maximizes your firm’s flexibility to complete work tasks any time, any place.
if your firm pursues exploitation, you should organize work to be high in
optimal sourcing