Chapter 4: Acceptance Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the definition of acceptance?

A

A (1) final and unqualified expression of assent to all terms of a contract that has to be (2) communicated to the offeror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 methods of acceptance

A

By words

By conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happens when a particular method is stipulated to acceptance

A

The offeree as to utilise the same method of acceptance that has been used by the offeror

If method of accptance is not specified, then the offeror is open able to use any method of acceptance to communicate to the offeror (even if it is more advantageous compared to the offer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 2 elements of acceptance

A

Mirror image rule

Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the mirror image rule

A

The final and unqualified assent to all terms of the offer

The acceptance must be the exact same as the terms that have been discussed in the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are counter offers and what is the general distinction

A

Counter offers must be clear and unambiguous

Counter offers are when the offeree ‘kills off’ the original offer my introducing a new term

Hyde v Wrench

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are mere inquiries and what is the general rule?

A

A mere inquiry does not kill off the original offer as it is just asking for more information. Merely posponing his decision until he gets more information

Stevenson v McLean

Must pay attention to wording, could be CO or inquiry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are cross offers

A

When two parties are arguing back and forth about the same offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the battle of the forms

A

When there is so many terms that keep being added, and the person that signs/accepts first is called the ‘last shot’ rule

Must read many times before accepting to terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Powell v Lee

A

Facts: Managers of the school passed a resolution to appoint the plaintiff who applied for the post position for headmaster. But the decision they came to was not communicated to the plaintiff

Held: passing of resolution without communication to plaintiff doesn’t constitute a contract appointed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Brodgen v Metropolitan Railway

A

Lord Blackburn held: acceptance in your own mind without any intimation to the other party expressed by a mere private act (i.e. putting letter in a drawer, receiving mail but not reading) does not complete an act

But both parties have allowed it then it would be binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Entores v Miles Far East Corp (1995) Lord Denning

A

Acceptance must be brought to the offeror’s attention

Scenario: If the line goes dead when bypassing a tunnel, and the offeror does not hear the acceptance on their side. It is the duty of the offeree to call back to repeat the acceptance

Scenario 2: If the acceptance was clear and the offeror didn’t hear properly, but didn’t call back to confirm, then the contract is binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What type of offers don’t need to be communicated to the offeror

A

unilateral contracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the general rule of silence as a form of acceptance

A

Silence is not recognised as acceptance, and the offeror cannot impose it on the offeree that they regard that as acceptance

As the law protects the offeree by avoiding imposition of unwanted contractual obligations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Felthouse v Bindley

A

Facts: Nephew owned a horse that the uncle wanted to buy. Uncle imposed silence as a form of acceptance, nephew didn’t reply and told D to not sell the horse. D sold the horse

Held: Silence did not amount to acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Re Selectmove

A

Facts: S owed Inland Revenue large sums of income tax and national insurance. S payed two payments under alleged agreement. S heard nothing more from the Revenue until october 9th, they demanded arrears of 24,650

Gibson LJ Held: Acceptance cannot be inferred from silence, where an offeror imposed the term as acceptance.

Although if the offeree himself indicates that it is acceptable if not sound by an ascertainable time, then it would amount to agreement

17
Q

What is the exception to the general rule of silence as a form of acceptance

A

The general rule may not apply where the offeree assumes that his silence has been effective to conclude a contract and then acts in reliance upon that belief. Some positive action is required on the part of the offeree as evidence that he has in fact accepted the offer

Where both parties specify that silence amounts to acceptance, which there must be a patent of dealings

Re Selectmove

18
Q

Can there be acceptance in ignoring an offer?

1 case

A

R v Clarke - Reward made public by the Government of Western Australia for information leading to arrest and convicted persons

C gave info that helped them get arrested. But when the accepted the offer, it didn’t cross his mind

Held: Unless the performer conducted the act with the faith or reliance upon the offer, there would be no offer. No contract

Generally rule - said that it is not binding

19
Q

What are the exceptions to the general rule of ingorance of an offer

2 cases

A

Exception, although not knowing they completed the act, and law says why not treat a good samaritan. As the participant still completed all the stipulated acts in the offer

  • Gibbons v Proctor
  • William v Cowardine
20
Q

What are the 2 types of communication

A

Instantaneous

Non-Instantaneous

21
Q

What are the 5 types of instantaneous and 2 non-instantaneous types of communication

A

Instantaneous
* Face to face
* Telephone
* Telex
* Fax
* Email

Non-Instantaneous
* Letters
* telegram

22
Q

What is the general rule for instantaneous communications

A

acceptance must be communicated to the offeror. And the contract is only concluded when the offeror received the acceptance

  • Entores v miles Far East Corp, Lord Denning
23
Q

Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl

A

Lord Wilberforce held although telex is considered instantaneous, it is must be noted that telex machines are merely conduct pipes which infro is channelled

Message may not reach the principle immediately

24
Q

What are the 2 approaches to emails

A

Postal Rule

Receipt Rule

25
Q

What is the discretionary note of communication via email

A

It is considered an “almost instantaneous communications”. Reason being as technology is invovled, there are unavoidable problems that come with it

26
Q

What are exceptions to the rule of communication of acceptance

A
  • Offeror waived the requirement of communication
  • Unilateral offers
  • Postal Rule (non-instantaneous communications)
27
Q

Adam v Lindsell

postal rule

A

Facts: Letter offered to sell B goods if he received an answer by return of post.

The offer notifying the acceptance arrived 2 days late that it was supposed to, offeror already sold goods

Held: binding contract, moment he accepted.

B was entitled to recover against A in action for not completing the agreement

28
Q

When does the postal rule apply

A
  • Use of post was reasonably contemplated by both parties - Household Fire Insurance v Grant
  • Post is the only reasonable form of communication. Must be reasonable for the offeree to use post
29
Q

When does the postal rule not apply

A
  • Not reasonable to post, where the use of post will lead to manifest inconvenience or absurdity
  • Not reasonably contemplated by parties
  • Offeror did not intend for postal rule to apply or the terms of the offer expressly excude the applcation of postal rule
  • incorreclty addressed
30
Q

What happens if acceptance is lost in post, what are the 2 cases that touch on this matter

A

Household fire Insurance v Grant
* acceptance is effective the moment it is posted

Brogden v Metropolitan Railway
* if an offeror sends through postal and says if agreed send back the answer through post, then as soon as they letter is posted (acceptance), the contract is conluded

31
Q

What are the practical difficulties of postal rule

A
  • contract formed without the offeror knowing (the delay in between receiving, the other party does not know the decision yet)
  • letter is lost in post
  • revocation of acceptance/retraction of the acceptance through a quicker or speedier means
32
Q

What are the 5 rules to the postal rule

A
  • Postal rule only applies to acceptance
  • Postal rule only applies to Non-instantaneuos communications
  • Postal Rule can be excluded
  • Postal Rule does not apply to making offers (Bryne v Van Tien Hoven)
  • Postal Rule does not apply to revoking of offers (Bryne v Van Tien Hoven)
33
Q

What is the scenario analysis Lord Denning gave for instantaneous communications: f2f, telephone, and telex

A

Face to face
* If offeror shouts across the road to offeree and doesn’t hear it then there is no contract

telephone
* If during conversation line goes dead, and the offeror didn’t hear the acceptance. No contract
* If can’t hear (indistinct), then need to ask him to repeat, or no contract

Telex
* line goes dead in middle of sentence acceptance. No contract

34
Q

What is the assumption if offeree believes their acceptance went through

A
  • if acceptance occured but the listener did not catch what they said, it is their duty to ask them to repeat. Then it there is a binding contract