Chapter 4-4.5 Flashcards

1
Q

Categorical proposition

A
  • asserts that either all or part of the class denoted by the subject term is include or excluded from the class denoted by the predicate term
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Standard form categorical proposition

A

1) quantifier -> all, no, some
2) subject term -> “members of the AMA” (before copula)
3) copula -> are and are not
4) predicate term -> “people holding degrees from recognized academic institutions” (after copula)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Propositions

A

Proposition…………….Quantity…………..Quality

1) All S are P (A) ….Universal…..Affirmative
2) No S are P (E)…..Universal….. Negative
3) Some S are P (I)…Particular .. Affirmative
4) Some S are not P (O).. Particular … Negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Existential Fallacy

A
  • invalid merely because the premise does not exist
  • Boolean standpoint (modern square)
  • only used in contrary, subcontrary and subalternation (traditional) -> when universal goes to particular
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Boolean stand point

A
  • recognizes that particular statements make a positive assertion about existence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Venn Diagrams

A

A) shade S side
E) shade middle
I) x in the middle
O) x in S side

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Modern Square of Opposition

A
  • Boolean standpoint

Logically undetermined-> has truth value can’t determine what it is
A———E
I———-O

Contradictory -> opposite truth values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Testing immediate inferences

A
  • one premise and one conclusion
  • plug premise into modern square of opposition
  • if it works then it’s unconditionally valid regardless of existential fallacy
  • illicit contrary, illicit subcontrary, illicit subalternation, illicit contraposition, illicit conversion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

1) Conversion

2) illicit conversion

A

1) switch subject and predicate terms
2) E,I -> same truth value.
A,O -> undetermined truth value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Obversion

A
  • change the quality
  • replace predicate term with compliment (non P)
  • all true
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

1) Contraposition

2) illicit contraposition

A

1) switch subject and predicate terms
- replace subject and predicate term with compliments

2) E,I -> undetermined truth value.
A,O -> determined truth value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Traditional Square of opposition

A
  • contradictory -> opposite truth value
  • contrary -> at least one is false (not both true). … If a is true e is false. But if a is false e is either false or true
  • subcontrary -> at least one is true (not both false)… If I is false O is true but if I is true A could be true or false
  • subalternation -> truth flows downward, falsity flows upward
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly