Chapter 3: Discharge of the contract Flashcards
How can a contract be brought to an end?
By Performance
By Frustration
By Breach of contract
Performance of the contract
A contract is usually discharged by the performance of both parties of their obligations under the contract.
Requirements of performance of the contract
Generally, the rule is that performance must be exact and precise and that a partial performance is no performance.
Cutter v Powell (1975)
Facts of ‘Cutter v Powell (1795)’
C was employed on a ship sailing from Jamaica to the UK.
He died before completing the journey.
His wife tried to sue to recover part of the wages due to her husband.
Held by ‘Cutter v Powell (1795)’
The widow was not entitled to anything because her husband had not completed the journey and there was no complete performance of the contract.
When can partial performance discharge the contract?
If it is freely accepted by the other party.
What level of performance would be a sufficient discharge?
Substantial Performance
If a contractor has substantially performed the contract with only minor defects what are they entitled to?
They are entitled to the contract price less the cost of remedying the defects.
Hoenig v Issacs (1952)
Facts of ‘Hoenig v Issacs (1952)’
H was employed by I to decorate his flat.
The price was £750 to be paid in instalments.
I paid £400 but refused to pay the rest as he was dissatisfied with H’s work.
Held by ‘Hoenig v Issacs (1952)’
I had to pay the outstanding amount less the cost of remedying the minor defects in H’s work.
What is meant by severable contracts?
If the contract is divisible, as in building contracts or employment contracts, the contracts can be discharged by performance of part of the obligations
In what circumstances is the offer or performance sufficient to discharge contractual obligations?
In some cases, one party is prevented from performing his or her duties under a contract due to the actions of the other part (e.g. if one party refuses the other party access to the site of building work).
What is meant by bringing an action for quantum meruit?
This is an order for the defendant to pay damages for the proportion of the contract price that the work is worth at this point.
Planche v Colburn (1831)
Facts of ‘Planche v Colburn (1831)’
C had agreed to write a book as part of a series of titles.
He was to be paid £100 on completion.
He did some research and started the book but the series for which the book was intended was cancelled.
Held by ‘Planche v Colburn (1831)’
C was entitled to payment of half of the agreed price as reasonable play on a quantum meruit basis.
Frustration of the contract
If it is impossible to perform the contract when it is made there is usually no contract at all.
If the contract is made and then the performance becomes impossible due to a matter for which neither party is responsible the contract is said to be discharged by ‘frustration’.
Frustration Case Law
Taylor v Caldwell (1863) - Destruction of Subject Matter
Condor v Barron Knights (1966) - Personal Incapacity
Morgan v Manser (1947) - Government Intervention
Krell v Henry (1903) - Non-occurrence of an event
Taylor v Caldwell (1863)
The hall let to a musician for a series of concerts was destroyed by fire before the first one.
The contract was held to be frustrated.