Chapter 3: Damages Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the intention of damages as a common law remedy?

A

They are intended to put both parties in the position they would have been in has the contract been performed properly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by ‘remoteness’?

A

It may not be justifiable to blame the party at fault for all the consequences of their actions.
Damages will only be awarded for losses which are not too remote.

Hadley v Baxendale (1854)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Facts of ‘Hadley v Baxendale (1854)’

A

C owned a mill.
One of the mill parts had broken.
C made a contract with D for the transport of the old part to London as a pattern for making a replacement.
D was responsible for a delay in delivering the part.
As a result the mill was closed for a longer duration.
C claimed for loss of profits during the period of delay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Held in ‘Hadley v Baxendale (1854)’

A

D did not know the mill was inoperable without the part.
The stoppage was not a natural consequence of delay in transportation.
C could have had a spare part and did not alert D that the mill would be in inoperable.
Accordingly, D was not liable for the loss of profit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case established that there are two types of loss that can be recovered?

A

Hadley v Baxendale (1854)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the two types of loss that can be recovered?

A

Losses which are a natural consequence of the breach.

Where losses are not reasonably foreseeable, the party in breach of contract will only be liable for them if they knew at the time of the contract that such losses could arise in these particular circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Facts of ‘Victoria Laundries v newman (1949)

A

A delay in the delivery of a boiler caused the loss of the normal trading profit plus an extra-large profit on the loss of a government contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Held in ‘Victoria Laundries v Newman (1949),

A

The loss of the normal profit could be claimed but not for the government contract since this was not made known to the defendant and was therefore too remote.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When are damages not usually recoverable?

A

For loss of enjoyment

Jarvis v Swan Tours (1973)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Facts of ‘Jarvis v Swan Tours (1973)’

A

Jarvis entered into a contract for a holiday at a winter sports’ centre.
What was provided was significantly inferior to the description in the brochure.
A very low award was given for financial loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Held in ‘Jarvis v Swan Tours (1973)’

A

The damages should be increased to compensate for the disappointment and distress because the principal purpose of the holiday was the giving of pleasure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is meant by the measure of damages?

A

The courts will usually value damages as the cost to put the claimant back in the position they would have been if the contract had been properly performed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is meant by damages for loss of bargain?

A

Bought goods for £50.
Seller refused to deliver.
Buyer had to pay £60 for the goods from someone else.
The buyer’s damage would be £10.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When will the claimant be awarded nominal damages?

A

If the claimant has suffered no actual loss, the buyer will be awarded only nominal damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by reliance losses?

A

These enable the claimant to recover compensation for expenses incurred in performing their part of the contract before the breach occurred.

Anglia TV v Reed (1972)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Facts of ‘Anglia TV v Reed (1972)’

A

R was engaged to play a leading role in a TV play.
The claimants incurred expenses in preparing for filming.
R then pulled out at the last moment and the project was abandoned.

17
Q

Held in ‘Anglia TV v Reed (1972)

A

R was liable for the expenses.
He was not liable for any projected profit since it is impossible to tell whether the film would have been a success or a failure.

18
Q

What is meant by mitigation of loss?

A

When calculating the level of damages to be awarded, the court will assume that the claimant has taken all steps that could reasonably be expected to mitigate their loss.

Brace v Calder (1895)

19
Q

Facts of ‘Brace v Calder (1895)’

A

B was employed in a partnership for a fixed period of two years.
After five months the partnership was dissolved.
B was offered identical employment with the new partnership but refused the offer and sued for wages he would have earned had he completed the two-year period.

20
Q

Held in ‘Brace v Calder (1895)’

A

B had no mitigated his loss and could only recover nominal damages.

21
Q

What are liquidated damages?

A

Liquidated damages are a genuine pre-estimate of the expected loss and are enforceable by the court.

22
Q

What is a penalty clause?

A

A penalty clause imposes a sum which is arbitrary or excessive and it will not usually be enforceable.
Instead the courts will act as if there is no provision in the contract and as with unliquidated damages they will value the claimant’s losses.

23
Q

When is a sum presumed to be a penalty clause?

A

The amount is out of proportion to the potential losses.

The same amount is given for a number of potential losses.

Ford Motor Co Ltd v Armstrong (1915)

24
Q

Facts of ‘Ford Motor Co Ltd v Armstrong (1915)’

A

The defendant had entered into a contract with Ford within which they agreed to not sell Ford’s cars at less than the list price.
A £250 penalty was given in the contract for each breach of this provision.

25
Q

Held in ‘Ford Motor Co Ltd v Armstrong (1915)’

A

As the same amount was given for a number of different breaches within the contract this was held to be a penalty clause and as such was not enforceable.

26
Q

Penalty Clauses: Facts of ‘Parkingeye Ltd v Beavis (2015)’

A

P managed a car park.
At the car park signs were displayed stating that customers could have two hours free parking but if they stayed after that an £85 charge would be levied.
Mrs Beavis stayed for almost three hours.

27
Q

Penalty Clauses: Held in ‘Parkingeye Ltd v Beavis (2015)’

A

The charge was given as a deterrent, not a penalty.
The court held the amount was given to allow the claimants to manage the car park in the best interests of all users by preventing visitors from overstaying.
As such Mrs Beavis had to pay.