Chapter 2: The terms of the contract Flashcards
Implied terms of the contract
In addition to those terms expressly included in the contract, terms can be implied by statute, the courts and custom and practice.
Difference between contractual terms and representations
A term is part of the contract.
A representation is something said by the offeror to induce the offeree to enter into the contract. It becomes a term once it is included in the written contract or is an important part of the contract i.e. one on which the other party relies.
Why is it important to know whether a statement in negotiations is a term or a representation?
The remedies available to a wronged party will be different.
Remedies for when representation included in the contract as a term is found to be untrue.
The party misled has a remedy for breach of the terms as well as for the misrepresentation.
Remedies for when representation is not a term of the contract and is found to be untrue.
The party misled can only claim remedies for the misrepresentation.
Express Terms
these terms are the elements of a contract which have been specifically agreed.
They can be written, oral or a combination of the two.
Such terms are specifically inserted into the contract by either or both parties.
They must be clear for them to be enforceable.
Scammell v Ouston (1941)
Facts of ‘Scammell v Ouston (1941)’
An agreement provided for the balance of the price to be paid …‘on hire purchase terms over a period of two years’…
Held by ‘Scammell v Ouston (1941)’
The words ‘hire purchase terms’ were considered too imprecise as the seller had a range of such terms.
Implied terms
These are terms which are not expressly included but are still part of the contract. They can be implied in four different situations.
What are the four situations where terms can be implied?
Terms implied due to the type of contract
Terms implied by the courts in order to give business efficacy
Terms implied to comply with custom and usage
Terms implied by Acts of Parliament
Terms implied due to the type of contract
The courts will imply certain terms to certain types of contract because they are felt to be an implicit requirement of that type of contract.
Terms implied by the courts in order to give business efficacy
If the parties have failed to cover a matter which, when addressed, would make the agreement unworkable, the courts imply a term to carry out the parties’ presumed intentions.
The Moorcock (1889)
Terms to comply with custom and usage
The courts will imply terms into contracts if they are felt to be usual in that type of agreement, but only if it will not create an inconsistency with the express terms.
Terms implied by Acts of Parliament
Legislation can imply terms into particular contracts if Parliament has felt it is important to give statutory protection.
The Consumer Rights Act 2015
The Partnership Act 1980
Illustration of Terms implied by the type of contract
In an employment contract many matters may not be expressly agreed, but the
courts have implied terms described as duties of the employee (such as to give
honest service) or as duties of the employer (such as to use reasonable care in
providing a safe place of work).