Chapter 20: Actuarial techniques (2) Flashcards
Liability hedging
Where the assets are chosen in such a way as to perform in the exact same way as the liabilities in all states.
Examples: Immunisation and cashflow matching
Immunisation
An example of liability hedging, where assets are matched to liabilities by term to reduce interest rate sensitivity (to parallel movements in the yield curve)
Cashflow matching using bonds
Investor holds a portfolio of government bonds (in the appropriate currency) until maturity to meet a pre-specified stream of future fixed payments.
Provided future payments do not change in amount and timing, the coupon and principal proceeds from the bond portfolio can be used to meet the obligation to make the payments
Problems encountered when cashflow matching with bonds
- Requires bond assets to be held that is equal in PV to the future payments discounted at bond yields (using the full yield curves). Therefore, only a partial hedge is possible if asset cover is less than 100% (e.g. if fund is unfunded)
- the term of the liabilities may extend longer than the term of available government bonds
- may be gaps between the maturities of available bonds - may need to reinvest/disinvest prior to maturity and hence the hedge may be imperfect
- if the process leads to large investment in government bonds, there is credit risk that may not be reflected in the liabilities
- if tax status of government bonds worsens, this means the assets are likely to be insufficient to meet the liability payments
- when valuing at bond rates, there may be some mark to market risk between the valuation of the assets and the valuation of the liabilities
How can repos be used to construct a liability hedge?
Where there are liquid repo markets on the bonds being used to construct the liability cashflow hedge, repo contracts can be used to release funds. In this way, a leveraged exosure to bonds can be created without investing the full market value.
Cashflow matching using bonds and swaps
In markets where liquid and deep interest rate derivatives markets have developed, additional flexibility in hedging fixed payments is available through the use of interest rate swaps.
Inflation-linked payments can be hedged using inflation swaps in combination with an interest rate swap.
Synthetic portfolio management
Using derivatives as opposed to direct investment
Advantages of using swaps to achieve a liability hedge as opposed to direct investment in bonds
Swaps:
- may have more and longer maturity dates available
- may be more liquid
- may have lower transaction costs
- are geared, which means a full match can be achieved even if funds are limited
- are flexible OTC instruments, which can make it easier to match many liabilities in one swap
Disadvantages of using swaps to achieve a liability hedge as opposed to direct investment in bonds
Swaps:
- can require costly legal documentation to be in place with an investment bank
- may require margin payments or other collateral, which could reduce overall liquidity
- are OTC instuments, which could make it harder to close out
- have more counterparty risk - the investment bank may default on payment
- interest rate curves can move differently to government bond interest rate curves resulting in basis risk
Advantages of synthetic portfolio management
- Using RPI swaps, the approach can be extended to match inflation-linked liabilities
- Swap durations can be longer than the duration of available bonds
- Swaps can be more liquid than bonds
- The cost of a swap portfolio can be less than the cost of a bond portfolio
- Full duration hedging can be achieved even if scheme is underfunded
- Swaps are flexible, particularly with regards to the exact term of the swap
Disadvantages of synthetic portfolio management
- To enter into a swap agreement ISDA documentation needs to be inplace with one of more market counterparties – expensive & time-consuming to set up
- Swaps will require collateralisation to mitigate credit risk and this may require the movement and investment of collateral on a weekly or daily basis
- Closing out a swap is harder and more complex than selling a bond. In a liquid market closing out a swap may have lower transaction costs than selling a government bond
- Counterparty risk exists with banking counterparties. May result in need for a new swap but at a higher cost (replacement risk) or the hedge lost
- Institutions usually require paying floating (& receive fixed) which means the assets will have to earn a reference rate – not always easy
- Basis risk exists between the swap yield curve and the bond yield curve
Other approaches to meeting liability payments
- Holding shorter maturity assets and ‘rolling-over’ contracts.
- May result in higher yield on assets than investing in long-dated assets/entering into long dated swaps
- This higher yield may not lead to a gain as reinvestment terms are uncertain and the ‘roll-over’ process may lead to higher transaction costs in the long run
PV01 and DV01
PV01 is used as a measure of the sensitivity of the liabilities to changes in interest rates. It is the change in the PV of the liabilities due to 1 basis point move in interest rates
DV01 measures the same change. DV01 is used when the liabilities are US dollar based
Liability Driven Investment (LDI)
The terminology used to describe an investment decision where the asset allocation is determined in whole or in part relative to a specific set of liabilities.
LDI is not a strategy or product available in the market but rather an approach to setting an investment strategy.
Under an LDI approach it is possible to closely match:
- the interest rate sensitivity (duration) of the liabilities
- the inflation-linkage of the liabilities
- the shape of the liabilities