Chapter 2 - Studying Groups Flashcards
How to get people to change their behaviour?
Deal with existing web of relationships, rather than isolate them as individuals
Collective Representations
Ideas, beliefs that don’t belong to the individual but instead are a product of social collectivity
Opposite of group fallacy
Group Fallacy + What is it the opposite of?
Groups are not real entitites
Individuals can think or feel but not groups
Opposite of collective representatitive
Fallacy that group is a whole rather than individual parts
Group Mind
Collective conciousness
People act diff in groups
Memebers act as if they are one mind but they truly dont sharea single mental state
When asked if group have minds, general people are thought not to have group minds (facebook users), but smaller, cohesive groups (ie. boston red sox) thoight to have group mine
Distance that a dot of light had moved experiment
People in the experiment accepted a standard estimate rather than their own judgement
When later given opportunity to make judgement alone, men still did not change their answer from the groups norm
New members who entered also changed his behaviour until it matched the groups norm - therefore the norm exists at the group level rather than individual level
Lewin and interactionism
Lewin is father of group dynamics
Behaviour is determined by the person and the environment that they are in. Ie. P could be extroversion but depending on the E the person may be quiet or loud
Field Theory Formula: b=f(P,E)
B: behaviour
F: function
P: personal characteristics
E: environment (include features of the group, group members, situation)
Individuals merge, something new is created
Group is more than the sum of individual members (gestalt)
Multilevel Perspective
Examining group behaviour from different levels:
Micro: research, actions of individual members
Meso: group level factors. Looking at cohesiveness, norms, roles, etc.
Macro: large group qualities such as observing communities and societies
Interdisciplinary perspective: bringing these perspectives together
What are the different types of observation?
Overt: no attempt to hide that you are observing
Covert: record group activity without them knowing
Partcipant observation: watching and recording group as a membership
Reactivity and Hawthorne Effect
People act differently when they know they are being observed
Western electric company
ALL Changes led to improved worker output
Figured that bright and dim lights cant both create a positive change thus
Worked harder because being observed
That’s why many use covert observation
How to structure Observations?
Qualitative study
Quantitive study:
Classify behaviour into a definable category
Code the categories
Specify what each behaviour will look like
Track the frequency of the occursncrs
Coding systems for studying groups:
IPA: interaction process analysis, classifies observed behav into 1 of 12 categories ie. shows solidarity
SYMLOG
IPA: interaction process analysis for observation
Robert Bales - interaction process analysis
Coding system for qualitative research
Emotional areas positive and negetive
task areas attempt to answer and asking questions to others
idea is that observer should know these types of actions and be aware when they occur
New model is for groups: SYMLOG - systematic multiplelevel observation of group
Realiability and validity of observations
Reliability: a measures consistancy
Interrater reliability: consistancy across raters
Validity: technique measures what it is suppose to measure
Reliability
Consistancy with results/test scores
Inter-rater reliability
Consistant no matter who the rater is
Validity
Technique measures what it is suppose to measure
Sociometry
Moreno
Measuring the relations between group members and summarizing the relationships geographically
Ie. women in cottage dispute. Change location of individuals with those they get a long with
Then placed into sociogram
Self-report measure