Chapter 2 Psychological Research Designs Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

First type of non-expiremental design; go into some sort of natural environment and observe; people who use this most are developmental psychologists
Advantage-high external validity (may be applied to general population)
Disadvantage- low internal validity (no cause and effect)

A

Naturalistic Observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

more specific type of naturalistic observation (around 5 to 10); basically long term study of one person or very few people (up to 10) typical length of study ranges from 10 to 20 year. Used for 3 typical things; Severe psychological disorder, twin studies and adoption studies
Allows us to study rare phenomena that are difficult to recreate in a lab. 3 major disadvantages; death, people may pull out at any time, and generalizability

A

Case Study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Researcher is studying the relationship between 2 variables. Relationships between depression and suicide; bipolar and violent crimes; they can be positive negative or zero

A

Correlation Designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are 3 types of correlation designs?

A

Positive, negative and zero

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Correlations range in value from______(___ ___) to _____(___ ___).

A

+1.0 (perfect positive)

-1.0 (perfect negative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Weak and strong values of correlations are

A

strong re greater than.5, weak is less than.5 (pos\neg)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

scatter plot that starts top left and goes down
scatter plot that has no line
scatter plot that starts bottom left and goes up right

A

negative
zero
positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Believing that there is a statistical correlation between 2 variables when there isn’t

A

Illusory Correlation
Ex. Full moon and strange behavior
Ex. Joint pain and weather change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Correlation VS Causation

A

Correlation relationships between 2 variables

Causation is cause and effect; because this happened, this is the result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why can’t we say one thing causes another based on correlational research?

A

Because there could be 3 variables involved, you would have to do an expirement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are some qualities of Expiremental Designs?

A

They do allow us to make cause and effect influences

To qualify as an “expirement” the design must consist of random assignment and manipulation of an independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A way to randomly place the research expirements into groups

A

Random Assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Group that receives independent variable

A

Experimental Group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Group that does not receive the independent variable

A

Control Group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What they are measuring or studying in order to see if the manipulation had an effect

A

Dependent Variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Variable the experimenter manipulates

A

Independent Variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Happens when a symptom improves or when something has an effect on a person because its expected

A

The Placebo Effect

17
Q

Harm that results from the expectation of harm, when in reality nothing painful is going on

A

The Nocebo Effect
Ex. Students who were told an electric current being passed through there heads might result in a headache, deveoped headaches

18
Q

Happens when researcher unintentionally biases the outcome of their experiment to support their hypthesis

A

The Experimenter Expectancy Effect (Rosenthal Effect)
(Can be avoided by doing a double blind experiment. Neither researcher or patients know the control group from the experimental group)

19
Q

Acting different because they are being watched

A

Hawthorne Effect

20
Q

A cue the participant picks up on during the experiment to help them guess what the hypothesis is

A

Influenced by demand characteristics

21
Q

How do you minimize influences by demand characteristics?

A
  1. ) Covert observation where researcher is hiding, you can’t see them
  2. ) Participant observation, where the researcher pretends to be a participant
22
Q

Why is it necessary to ensure that researchers use random selection?

A

To ensure that results are generalizable to the population

23
Q

A way to select your participants so that every single person in the population has the same chance to get picked in the study

A

Random Selection

24
Q

Difference between random selection and random assignment

A

Random Selection - deals with how you choose your participants before anything starts
Random Assignment - happens after the study

25
Q

Concerns whether or not your test actually measures what it is supposed to measure

A

Validity

26
Q

Concerns whether the results are consistent across different times and different measures

A

Reliability

27
Q

How many types of reliability are there, and what are they?

A
  1. Retest- take a test, then take it again but do everything the same, study the same material and spend the same amount of time studying, and you will receive a similar result
28
Q

Multiple people scoring the same test, they all should give the test a similar score

A

Interrator Reliability

29
Q

What are the advantages and disadvantages to a self survey?

A

Advantage-less work, and much easier
Disadvantage-You assume people know enough about themselves to answer questions correctly. (people lie and distort their answers)

30
Q

Making yourself seem better than you actually are

A

Positive Impression Management

31
Q

Trying to make yourself look worse

A

Malingering

32
Q

Someone rates you positive in one area so they continue to rate you positive in all areas

A

Halo Effect

33
Q

Someone rates you bad in one way so they continue to rate you bad in all ways

A

Horns Effect

34
Q

Tendency to give over generous ratings to people we like regardless of their true performance

A

Leniency Effect

35
Q

Studied effects of syphilis on the body if left untreated. Needed a sample of African American men. Long term case study. Men reported to lab 2-3 times a week, but they did not know they had been tested positive for syphilus

A

Tuskegee Study

36
Q

What are some ethical problems with the tuskegee study?

A

They let them die, they did not inform them that they had syphilis, they did not tell them what they were studying, and they allowed them to spread it around

37
Q

What must all studies be presented to involving ethical issues?

A

Institution Review Board

38
Q

What are Institution Review Boards usually made up of?

A

University faculty, members from various departments, as well as a few outside members of the community

39
Q

Goal of Institution review board?

A

To protect people from mental and/or physical harm

40
Q

Have to tell participants every single thing that is going to happen to them in the experiment; Inform them that at times in therapy if they aren’t doing their work they must be confronted; Have to tell them if anything may make them uncomfortable on survey and inform them that they can drop out at anytime; Must answer all questions

A

Informed Consent

41
Q

After the experiment was over with, before they can leave you must explain the purpose of the study, why you did what you did, if you used any deceit (lies) how and why, any questions they have you must answer, and you must make sure they are okay before they leave

A

Debriefing