Chapter 2 Ethical Decision-Making Models Flashcards
what are the 4 values of the Kitchener’s Ethical Justification Model
autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice
define the BETAN hermeneutic model
how we interpret our values in the context of the ethical situation. model asks us to acknowledge our personal reactions to professional issues as we make these ethical decisions.
define the virtue ethics model of JORDAN AND MEARA
virtue ethics model focuses on who the counselor should be. We have to do our own work to do this work well
define the Sileo and Kopala (1993) A-B-C-D-E Worksheet
a- assessment (look into antecedent events of the dilemma and assess personal biases/values, and strengths/barriers of the client)
b- benefit (what helps the client without doing harm and/or benefits the most parties possible)
c- consequences and consultation (
d - duty (whom is serviced owed to besides the client?)
e- education (be educated on code of ethics and laws/policies in play)
what are the 8 steps for the Corey, Corey, Corey, and Callahan (2015) model
identify the problem
identify potential issues involved
review code of ethics
review laws/regulations/policies
seek consultation/supervision
consider possible courses of action
determine consequences of each action
decide on what appears to be the best course of action
what are the 7 steps to the Forester-Miller and Davis (1996)
identify the issue
apply ACA code of ethics
determine nature of the dilemma (research the matter and seek consultation)
determine possible courses of action
consider consequences of each course of action
evaluate selected action point
implement action point
what are the 4 stages of the Tarvydas (2012) Integrative Decision-Making Model of Ethical Behavior
Stage I. Interpreting the Situation Through Awareness and Fact-Finding
Stage II. Formulating an Ethical Decision (consult/supervise, research, attend to the code, determine positive and negative consequences)
Stage III. Selecting an Action By Weighing Competing Nonmoral Values, Personal Blind Spots, or Prejudices (self-reflective processing)
Stage IV. Planning and Executing the Selected Course of Action
what are the 12 steps for the Kocet, McCauley, and Thompson (2009) Ethical Decision Making for Student Affairs
Develop an ethical worldview.
Identify the ethical dilemma or problem.
Weigh competing ethical principles.
Select relevant ethical guidelines and professional standards.
Examine potential cultural and contextual issues impacting the ethical dilemma.
Investigate applicable laws, campus regulations, policies, procedures, handbooks, Web sites, and so on.
Search for ethical, legal, and professional precedence.
Engage in collaborative consultation and brainstorming.
Evaluate possible consequences and options of action or inaction.
Choose a course of action.
Implement the selected course of action.
Reflect on the experience as it relates to future ethical decisions.
what are the 5 steps of the Cottone’s (2004) Social Constructivism Mode
Obtain information from all involved.
Assess the nature of the relationships among all involved. Are they harmonious? Conflictual? Adversarial?
Consult colleagues, experts, ethical codes, laws, and other regulations.
Negotiate among these first three concepts to arrive at a consensual decision.
Engage in interactive reflection throughout the process.
what makes the social constructivism model unique
it pulls in the client’s cultural background because it includes their family/friends/social supports in the picture
what are the 4 steps of the Garcia, Cartwright, Winston, and Borzuchowska (2003) Transcultural Integrative Model
Interpret the situation through awareness and fact-finding (maintain cultural sensitivity in this process)
Formulate an ethical decision
Weigh competing, nonmoral values, and affirm the course of action.
Plan and execute the selected course of action
what 2 models does the Garcia, Cartwright, Winston, and Borzuchowska (2003) Transcultural Integrative Model borrow from ?
Social Constructivism Model and also adds elements of the Tarvydas model
what kind of perspective should crisis counseling ethical decision making models follow according to JORDAN
an eco systemic perspective
define an eco systemic perspective
consider the full ecological context/holistic experience of the person
what are the 10 steps for the ethical decision making model of JORDAN for crisis counseling that uses an eco systemic perspective
Identify the ethical concern within the context of the crisis.
Consider personal (the crisis counselor’s) self, beliefs and values, skills, and knowledge.
Identify the code(s) of ethics involved.
Determine possible ethical traps.
Frame a preliminary response.
Consider the consequences.
Prepare an ethical resolution.
Get feedback and consultation from other crisis counselor(s).
Take action.
Review the outcome.
