Chapter 2 (Criminal Law) Test Revision Flashcards
List the crimes against the person (know at least 5).
- Homicide (Murder, manslaughter, defensive homicide, infanticide and child homicide)
- Driving offences (culpable driving causing death, dangerous driving causing death, dangerous driving causing serious injury)
- Rape
- Assault
- Kidnapping and blackmail
List the defences to homicide (know all).
- Self-defence
- Duress
- Sudden or extraordinary emergency
- Mental impairment
- Automatism
- Intoxication
- Accident
List the defences to assault (know all).
- Self-defence
- Duress
- Necessity
- Intoxication
- Lawful use of force
List the elements of murder.
- The killing was unlawful
- The accused was over the age of discretion (10)
- The victim was human
- The accused was of sound mind
- The accused caused the victim’s death
- Malice aforethought existed
Max 20-25 years.
Explain the two categories of manslaughter.
Criminal negligence - The accused owed the victim a duty of care (any reasonable person would complete the action or inaction that the accused did not)
Unlawful and dangerous acts - must be proven that:
> The physical act was intentional
> The act was unlawful
> The act was dangerous
> The accused did not act in self-defence
Max 20 years.
Explain defensive homicide.
A person is charged with defensive homicide if the jury/judge finds that they are not guilty of murder, but that the accused’s actions were unreasonable when acting in self-defence.
Max 20 years.
Explain infanticide.
Where a mother kills a child (under two years of age) in circumstances that would ordinarily be murder but for the fact that she has a mental condition caused by the effects of that child’s birth.
Max 5 years.
Explain child homicide.
When a person kills a child who is under 6 years of age, in circumstances that would normally be called manslaughter, would be found guilty of child homicide.
Max 20 years.
What must the accused prove if he or she is to use self-defence?
Must prove that he or she:
- Had a belief that it was necessary to act to defend themselves or another person from serious harm or injury
- Acted reasonably
What must be proven for duress?
A person acts under duress when they reasonably believe that:
- A threat of harm would be carried out if they didn’t commit a crime
- Committing a crime was the only reasonable way of avoiding threatened harm
- Their conduct is a reasonable response to the threat made
What must be proven for the defence of sudden or extraordinary emergency?
If the person reasonably believes that:
- There is a sudden emergency or situation
- Their actions are the only reasonable way of dealing with the emergency situation
- Their conduct is a reasonable response to the emergency situation
What must be proven for mental impairment?
A person must have been suffering from a mental illness at the time the crime was committed, and as a result the person:
- Did not know what he or she was doing
- Could not reason, or think about, their conduct like an ordinary person (did not know that it was wrong)
What must be proven for automatism?
It must be shown that the act was:
- Involuntary
- Done by a person who was not conscious of what they were doing (Eg. Sleepwalking)
What must the prosecution prove for culpable driving causing death?
The prosecution must prove that the driver was doing ONE of the following:
- Driving recklessly
- Driving negligently
- Driving under the influence of alcohol or a drug to the extent of being incapable of properly controlling the vehicle
Distinguish between Culpable driving causing death, Dangerous driving causing death and Dangerous driving causing serious injury.
Most serious - Culpable driving causing death (Max 20 years)
Lesser offence - Dangerous driving causing death (Max 10 years)
Least serious - Dangerous driving causing serious injury (Max 5 years)