Chapter 2: Basics Flashcards
LSAT stimuli fall into 2 categories:
- Argument
- Set of facts
what is primary objective #1
determine if stimulus is argument or facts
what are the premise indicator words
- because
- since
- for, for example
- for the reason that
- in that
- given that
- as indicated by
- due to
- owing to
- this is seen from
- we know this by
what are the conclusion indicator words
- thus
- therefore
- hence
- consequently
- as a result
- so
- accordingly
- clearly
- must be that
- shows that t
- concludes
- follows that
- for this reason
if there is a conclusion stem . . .
identify if before identifying the question stem
primary objective #2
if the stimulus contains an argument, identify the conclusion. if it contains a fact set, examine each fact
what is “conclusion/premise form”
when the premise is held by commas after the conclusion indicator.
Ex: “Therefore, since (premise)
additional premise indicators
- furthermore
- moreover
- besides
- in addition
- what’s more
counter premises
points that can be brought up to compare and contrast or to minimize the damage of a counterpoint
counter premise indicators
- but
- yet
- however
- on the other hand
- admittedly
- although
- in contrast
- even though
- still
- whereas
- after all
- in spite of
- despite
how do you recognize conclusions without indicators #1
you can try to turn an argument into a conversation.
Ex: conclusion. Really? Why? Premise.
how do you recognize conclusions without indicators #2
conclusion identification method.
take the statements and place them in order so one is conclusion. then add indicators. do this until it logically makes sense.
Whats a simple conclusion
premise -> conclusion
whats a complex conclusion
premise -> conclusion/premise->conclusion
primary objective #3
if the stimulus contains an argument, determine if it is strong or weak.
*ask if the premise justifies the conclusion