Chapter 2: Animal Research HL Flashcards
Comparative Psychology
they focus on a particular species or compare this species to humans
Animal models
a concept that refers to using animal research to test a certain cause-effect hypothesis about a certain human behavior.
An example would be stress models (explain depression due to exposure to stressful situations), separation models (separation from others causing depression), medical models (chemical imbalances in the brain), etc.
Premack (2007)
The idea is that the deeper brain structures can be found in animals as well and the further down you go the further down evolution you see (MacLean (1990).
This led some scientists to argue that the comparison of brain differences might not give us a full understanding of how animals are psychologically similar to humans and that we need to compare psychological functions as well.
Premack (2007) carried out such a comparison. He says that whenever we find a similarity, we need to find a dissimilarity.
Principles of animal research
Animal research is to some extent generalizable to humans, as the physiology and genetic set-up of humans and animals are similar
Animal research may inform our understanding of human behavior
Behavior is the product of physiology and behavior can be genetically inherited
Advantages of animal research and ways of keeping it ethically right
Ethical considerations that can be applied:
- Anesthesia and euthanasia for more humane treatment.
- Guidelines and healthy benevolent treatment for nonhuman animals.
- Non-invasive methodologies and experimental techniques. E.g. behavioral observation
Advantages:
- Easy gene modification for research
- Animals are easy to control.
- (Potential) medical discoveries
- Increased understanding and development of treatments for neurological and psychological disorders
- Many similarities between mice and humans
- Animals live shorter lives, which allows for studying the full lifespan.
- Inexpensive
Disadvantages and ethical considerations
- Trivial findings are likely as non-human animals are different than humans in many areas. (E.g. drugs can affect nonhuman animals differently).
- Even if humans and animals are similar in some biological aspects, they can still differ psychologically.
- Animals can’t tell us what they want - they have no saying in their own destiny.
- Environmental (laboratory) and other specific effects will not be taken into consideration when researching phenomena such as depression. - social psychology
- Problems with transferability (to humans).
- An animal model is never going to be 100 percent representative of human anatomy, physiology, cognition or behavior.
Three main groups of research purposes
- Compare species to humans (comparative psychology).
- Use the study of animals as models of human beings hoping that the findings will be universal and generalizable.
- To understand human conditions such as diseases
Main experimental manipulation types used in animal models
- Genetic manipulation (when animals are bred in a certain way)
- Invasive manipulations with the nervous system (brain parts are stimulated with electrodes, lesioned, or removed)
- Invasive manipulations with other body parts (by substances or damage)
- Behavioral and environmental manipulations (e.g. electric shocks for maze training of rats)
MacLean (1990)
The idea that the deeper we go into the brain, the more “primitive” structures we will find, and that this is seen in animals as well as humans. The Triune Brain proposed by MacLean (1990) divides the human brain into three parts:
- reptilian complex
- paleomammalian complex (limbic system)
- neocortex.
However, the evolution of brain structure is more complex than simply it building newer structures upon old structures, which has been discovered by comparative neurobiology that showed that neurons in humans and animals are different.
Ethical guidelines (APA)
Any animal study should be justified with a clear scientific purpose. It should increase scientific knowledge of behavior, our understanding of a particular species, or have beneficial results for humans or animals.
It should be ensured that the chosen species is the best choice, the minimum number of them is used, and what pain is caused.
Study proposals must be sent to the Ethics Committee.
Researchers must know the normal behavior of the species.
Lab animals must be given humane care.
Studies should always try to minimize discomfort for animals.
If in much pain, the animal should be euthanized.
Lab animals must not be released into the wild.
Karl Lashley
Topic:
Brain and behavior (localization).
Study:
Lashley’s experiments with rats: removing varying portions of the cortex to see if the memory of the maze disappears
Findings:
Performance deterioration depends on the percentage of cortex destroyed but not on the location of the destroyed cells. This challenges the idea of localization of function for memory.
Merzenich et al (1984)
Topic:
Brain and behavior (neuroplasticity)
Study:
Merzenich et al (1984): cortical representations of the hand in adult owl monkeys
Findings:
There was re-specialization of brain matter responsible for one digit so that it became responsible for other, adjacent digits.
Romero et al (2014)
Topic:
Hormones and behavior
Study:
The role of oxytocin in promoting social bonds in mammals in non-reproductive contexts
Findings:
Dogs were placed in a room with their owner and another dog. Dogs sprayed with oxytocin showed higher affiliation towards their owner. Similar results were observed for the other dog in the room: affiliation and approach behaviors were more frequent in the oxytocin condition.
Weaver et al (2004)
Topic:
Genetics and behavior (epigenetics)
Study:
Weaver et al (2004): epigenetic research on how the type of nurturing rats receive from their mothers in early life affects the way their brain responds to stress in later life.
Findings:
Less nurturing in early life was linked to the suppression of the glucocorticoid receptor gene. The genetic sequences themselves did not differ. This study demonstrates the effeCts of gene suppression on behavior.
Hetherington and Ranson (1942)
Lesioned the ventromedial hypothalamus in order to see the role of the part of the brain on eating behavior, which found that rats increased their food intake (and often doubled their weight), and as such concluded that the hypothalamus acted as a brake on eating. Later research showed that since lesioning can be imprecise, the actual part of the brain responsible was not the VMH