Chapter 17.2 - Appeal to Court of Appeal Flashcards
APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL
Overview
1) Jurisdiction to hear appeal
2) Appealable decisions
3) Stay of execution
4) Procedures for appeal
APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL
Jurisdiction to hear appeal
1) The law:
- Art. 1212 (1B)
- S.50 CJA:
2) Scope:
- Final decision within S.3.
- decision made by HC in the exercise of its original jurisdiction;
- decision of HC in the exercise of its appellate or revisionary jurisdiction in respect of criminal matter decided by Sessions Court.
- decision of HC in the exercise of its appellate or revisionary jurisdiction in respect of criminal matter decided by Magistrate’s court, provided that leave from CA is obtained & appeal shall lie in questions of law only.
APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL
Appealable & non-appealable decisions
1) Decisions - S.50(1)
- HC’s decision in original jurisdiction;
- HC’s decision in revisionary or appellate jurisdiction for matters originated in SC;
- HC’s decision in revisionary or appellate jurisdiction for matters originated in MC, provided LEAVE OF CA is obtained & appeal is only on QUESTIONS OF LAW.
2) Questions - S.50(2) CJA:
- general: question of fact/law/mixed.
- exception: matters from MC - only question of law.
3) Mixture of facts & merits of case law - Tay Swee Teck v PP (CA, 2018):
- mixture of facts or merits of the case and law was obviously not in accordance with s. 50(2) of the CJA & thus not appealable.
4) Application for leave - S.50(2A) CJA:
- within 14 days after the date of HC’s decision.
APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL
Stay of execution
1) Arrest in certain cases - S.56A:
- CA may issue warrant to commit the accused to prison or admit him on bail.
2) Stay of execution - S.57 CJA:
- may be granted in accordance with well-established judicial principles & based on the facts and circumstances of each case.
- The grant of a stay is only an exception to the general rule;
- special or exceptional circumstances must be shown to exist before the discretion can be exercised in favour of a convicted applicant.
PROCEDURES FOR APPEAL
Overview
1) Pre-requisites
2) Procedural requirements
3) Procedures at hearing
4) Possible outcomes of appeal
PRE-REQUISITES FOR APPEAL
Matter originated in Magistrate court
1) The law - S.50(1) CJA:
- HC’s decision in revisionary or appellate jurisdiction for matters originated in MC, provided LEAVE OF CA is obtained & appeal is only on QUESTIONS OF LAW.
- i.e. leave of CA + question of law only.
2) Mixture of facts & merits of case law - Tay Swee Teck v PP (CA, 2018):
- mixture of facts or merits of the case and law was obviously not in accordance with s. 50(2) of the CJA & thus not appealable.
3) Application for leave - S.50(2A) CJA:
- within 14 days after the date of HC’s decision.
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL
Overview
1) Notice of appeal
2) Grounds of decision & record of proceedings
3) Petition of appeal
4) Appeal record
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL
Notice of appeal
1) The law:
- S.51 CJA: must be filed within 14 days after date of decision.
2) Contents of Notice:
- substance of judgment of appeal against;
- address for service of notice;
- signed by appellant & advocate, PP or SG.
3) Sent to Registrar CA - r.58 RCA:
- A copy of the Notice of Appeal shall be sent by the appellant to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal.
4) Fax transmission - PP v Mohd Hussein Mohd Kassim (2018):
- There was no provision nor was there any room for interpretation that a fax transmission could be considered as filing of the notice of appeal.
- therefore, fax transmission to file notice of appeal is not a valid mode of filing.
5) Fax transmission appeal to HC - Jawan Ak Empaling:
- filing of the petition of appeal via facsimile was accepted since it does not provide under the section that only the original copy of the petition of appeal ought to be lodged.
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL
Grounds of decision & record of proceedings
1) The law:
- S.52 CJA: written judgment shall form the record of proceedings.
- Registrar shall cause to be served on the appellant a notice that a copy of the record is available & can be applied to have it on the payment of fee except for PP.
2) Effect of delay - Tan Hun Wah v PP:
- HC judge must do so with reasonable speed.
i. e. delay of 3 years has prejudiced the accused.
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL
Petition of appeal
1) The law - S.53 CJA:
- within 10 days after service of notice of availability of record of proceedings;
- to the Registrar of HC, but see rules below.
2) r.65 RCA:
- petition of appeal is filed with Registrar of CA which then will extend a copy to HC.
3) Extension of time:
- the law: S.56 CJA
- i.e. CA has the discretion to extend time upon application by of the appealing party.
4) Exercise of discretion - Exercise of discretion: PP v Ismail bin Abd Wahab:
- draws a distinction between the treatment for the delay for notice of appeal and the petition of appeal.
- courts are more liberal in condoning (i.e. accepting) application to file out of time the petition of appeal and not notice of appeal.
- the Courts are more stringent in ensuring the adherence to the 14-day rule in relation to notice of appeal in comparison to a petition of appeal.
5) Exercise of discretion - PP v Azman Abdul Ghani:
- Discretion must be exercised on such terms as he may consider desirable in order that substantial justice may be done in the matter;
- The court would not attempt any definition of what is substantial justice, but it is suggested that substantial justice is done when a rightful conviction is upheld and a wrongful one is quashed.
- To exercise his discretion properly, the judge must apply his mind to all the relevant material.
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL
Appeal record
1) Transmission of appeal record - S.55 CJA:
- Registrar of the HC shall transmit 4 copies of record of proceedings, together with notice of appeal & petition of appeal.
PROCEDURES AT HEARING
Overview
1) The law & scope
2) Quorum of judges
3) Adducing fresh evidence
4) Judgment of appeal
PROCEDURES AT HEARING
The law & scope
1) The law:
- S.60(1) CJA
2) Scope:
- hear appellant & respondent;
- hear appellant & respondent in reply.
PROCEDURES AT HEARING
Quorum of judges
1) The law:
- S.38(1) CJA: 3 judges or more, uneven numbers.
2) Effect on authoritative value of the judgment - Dalip Bhalwan Singh v PP:
- whatever the number is, it does not affect the authority of the judgment;
- i.e. it does not mean that a case heard by larger quorum is more authoritative than one heard before three judges.
PROCEDURES AT HEARING
Adducing fresh evidence
1) The law - S.61(1) CJA:
- may admit additional evidence if it thinks necessary;
- either by itself or direct it to be taken by trial court.
- parties shall be present when additional evidence is taken.
2) Conditions - R v Parks:
- not available at trial.
- relevant to the issue;
- credible evidence although need not be inconvertible, i.e. being well capable of belief; and
- the court will after considering that evidence, go on to consider whether there has been a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury of the evidence had been at trial.
Followed in Malaysian cases:
- Che Din bin Ahmad v Public Prosecutor;
- Lau Foo Sun v Government of Malaysia.