Chapter 17.1 - Appeal & Revision to High Court Flashcards

1
Q

APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Overview

A

1) Creation of right to appeal
2) Jurisdiction to hear appeal
3) Non-appealable decisions
4) Non-appealable decision except with PP sanction
5) Procedures for appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Creation of right to appeal

A

PP v DSAI:

  • No appeal from a court shall lie to any other court;
  • Unless there is a statutory provision which gives a right to appeal.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Jurisdiction to hear appeal

A

S.26 CJA:

  • To hear appeal from sub-courts within the territorial jurisdiction of the HC.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Non-appealable decisions

A

1) S.304:
- No appeal against fine less than RM25.
2) S.305:
- No appeal against conviction if the accused pleads guilty, except as to EXTENT OR LEGALITY of sentence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Non-appealable decision except with PP sanction

A

S.306:

  • Appeal against acquittal by Magistrate can only be lodged with written sanction by PP.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PROCEDURES FOR APPEAL

Overview

A

1) Pre-requisites
2) Procedural requirements
3) Procedures at hearing
4) Possible outcomes of appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

PRE-REQUISITES FOR APPEAL

Overview

A

1) Any person
2) Judgment, sentence or order
3) In a criminal case or matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

PRE-REQUISITES FOR APPEAL

Any person

A

R v WBE Rudguard:

  • ‘any person’ refers to a person who is a party to the criminal proceeding in the trial court, i.e. the accused & PP.
  • PP comes under the description of ‘any person’ in S.307.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

PRE-REQUISITES FOR APPEAL

Judgment, sentence or order

A

1) Must be final - test to determine - Ang Gin Lee v PP:

  • The order must first of all be a final order.
  • The test: whether the judgment or order finally disposes of the rights of the parties.

2) Rulings & interlocutory orders - Maleb bin Su v PP:

  • all procedural rulings made in the course of the trial are not appealable.
  • Ref. PP v DSAI - example:
    • Ruling of trial judge on a particular witness is not appealable;
    • Decision of refusing granting of bail is not appealable.

3) Meaning of order - Sia Kim Yoke v PP:

  • An ‘order’ under S.307 is opposed to judgment;
  • Normally made in summary proceedings on petition or summons;
  • May be enforced in the same manner as a judgment;
  • Affects parties to the proceedings personally or on their property; and
  • It is final in that it finally disposes of the rights of the parties.
  • Example: order or summons to produce under S.51.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PRE-REQUISITES FOR APPEAL

In a criminal case or matter

A

1) Anand v Home Secretary:

  • the cause or matter which if carried to its conclusion might result in conviction of the person charged; and
  • in a sentence of some punishment such as imprisonment or fine.

2) Re Clifford & O’Sullivan:

  • it must involve the consideration of some charge of crime, i.e. an offence against the public law.
  • the charge must be preferred before some court or judicial tribunal having or claiming jurisdiction to impose punishment for the offence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Overview

A

1) Notice of appeal
2) Form of notice of appeal
3) Grounds of decision
4) Petition of appeal
5) Notes of evidence
6) Appeal record

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Notice of appeal

A

THE TIME TO LODGE

1) The law - S.307(1):
- must be lodged within 14 days.
2) Multiple offences - R Vijaya Raj:

  • 14 days will run from the acquittal (or conviction) of that one particular charge;
  • Not the trial of remaining charge.

EXTENSION OF TIME

1) The law:
- S.310
2) Exercise of discretion - PP v Sundravelu:

  • the court has a discretion whether or not to allow the application;
  • emphasis should be given on the phrase ‘in order that substantial justice may be done in the matter’.

3) Exercise of discretion - Sam Yew Choy v PP:

  • courts are reluctant to exercise its power to grant an enlargement of time under S.310;
  • unless there are compelling reasons to do so;
  • and default of counsel can only be excused when it is absolutely certain that the applicant is completely free to blame.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Form of notice of appeal

A

1) The law:

  • S.307(1)
  • S.307(2)

2) Must be signed - Jayansankaran v PP:

  • both notice and petition of appeal may be validly signed by the appellant’s advocate on his behalf;
  • qui facit per alium facit per se;
  • i.e. he who does an act through another in law is deemed to do it himself.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Grounds of decision

A

1) The law:
- S.307(3)
2) Speedy preparation is required - Voon Chin Fatt v PP:

  • Magistrate is expected to prepare the grounds with all convenient speed;
  • Undue delay will cause a failure of justice and prejudiced to the accused, resulting in conviction being quashed.

3) Preparation of grounds of decision - Sia Kim Yoke v PP:

  • Magistrate could not be excused from preparing the grounds of decision;
  • OTF, it is held that the issue of plea of autrefois convict is substantive in nature and appealable, therefore grounds of decision must be prepared.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Petition of appeal

A

1) The law:
- S.307(4)
2) PP v Jawan Ak Empaling:
- time to file a petition of appeal under S.307(4) starts to run from the receipt of the grounds of the decision by the appellant.
3) Via facsimile - Jawan Ak Empaling:
- filing of the petition of appeal via facsimile was accepted since it does not provide under the section that only the original copy of the petition of appeal ought to be lodged.
4) Contents of petition - PP v Jitweer Singh Ojagar Singh (FC, 2014):

  • must particularise the points of law or of fact which the court appealed from is alleged to have erred.
  • However, that is not to say that the court is therefore powerless to permit a point of law or of fact, which is not in the petition of appeal, to be raised.
  • FC this overruled Yan Wing Lee v. PP and the cases that followed it, which purported to lay down an inflexible rule that it is mandatory that grounds not itemised in the petition of appeal must be disregarded without any discretion to admit it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Notes of evidence

A

1) The law:
- S.307(5)
2) Entitlement of notes of evidence - PP v Tan Tho Kim:
- appellant was entitled to request for and to be supplied with notes of evidence upon filing the notice of appeal although it has been supplied during the course of the trial.

17
Q

PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO APPEAL TO HIGH COURT

Appeal record

A

1) The law:
- S.308
2) Scope:

  • upon compliance with all requirements under S.307, the court appeal from shall transmit the appeal record signed by PP & appellant to High Court;
  • together with grounds of decision + notice + petition of appeal.
18
Q

PROCEDURES AT HEARING

All parties present

A

S.313(1)

19
Q

PROCEDURES AT HEARING

Absence of appellant

A

1) The law:
- S.313(2)
2) Scope of discretionary power - Hayati bte Aizan v PP:
- the court may consider the appeal as provided by the proviso only if it fixes any terms, for example, by requiring an attendance of the appellant at an adjourned date.
3) Power to strike-out appeal - Rahim bin Usoff v PP:

  • the court is empowered to strike out an appeal where the appellant fails to appear on the date fixed for hearing;
  • this drastic step will not ordinarily be taken without giving an opportunity for the appellant to prosecute the appeal.
  • i.e. only when the appellant fails to appear for three times, court will exercise the power to strike-out the appeal.

4) Re-instatement of appeal - Hardial Singh v Faridah bte Haron & Ors:

  • there is no express provision to allow reinstatement of appeal upon being struck-out;
  • court may invoke its inherent jurisdiction to allow such reinstatement.
  • i.e. when the appellant is absent because he is not given notice on the date of hearing, the appeal should be restored in the interests of justice.
20
Q

PROCEDURES AT HEARING

Absence of respondent

A

1) The law:
- S.314
2) Proceed to hear - PP v Goh Thor Kiah:

  • ‘shall’ is mandatory only if the respondent is the prosecutor.
  • where the absent respondent is an accused person who is acquitted;
    and the service of notice of appeal could not be effected after various efforts;
  • Court may dismiss the appeal.
  • i.e. hearing the appeal in the absence of acquitted person will be equal to punishing a person without giving him the opportunity to be heard.
21
Q

PROCEDURES AT HEARING

Arrest of respondent in certain cases

A

1) The law:

- S.315

22
Q

PROCEDURES AT HEARING

Arrest of respondent in certain cases

A

1) The law:
- S.315
2) Scope:

  • GR: grant bail to secure attendance;
  • Exception: commit him to prison.
23
Q

POSSIBLE OUTCOMES OF APPEAL

The law & scope

A

1) The law:
- S.316
2) Scope:

-

24
Q

POSSIBLE OUTCOMES OF APPEAL

Appeal by PP against an order of acquittal

A

1) The law:
- S.316(a)
2) Reverse the order of acquittal - Paramasivam & Ors v PP:
- if the facts so warrant & the acquittal was based on wrong grounds.
2) Consequential order after reversing an order of acquittal:

  • Direct that further inquiry be made; or
  • Direct that accused be retried; or
  • Direct that the accused be committed for trial; or
  • Find the accused guilty & pass sentence on him according to law.
  • Find the accused guilty for different charge & pass sentence according to law.
25
Q

POSSIBLE OUTCOMES OF APPEAL

Appeal by accused against an order of conviction

A

1) The law:
- S.316(b)
2) Consequential order for allowing appeal - Ariffin bin Cassim v PP:
- Where an appellate court allow the appeal & reverse a conviction, it should either acquit the accused or order a retrial by a competent court.

26
Q

APPLICATION FOR REVISION TO HIGH COURT

Overview

A

1) Powers to revise
2) Object of revisionary power
3) Appeal or revision
4) Invoking revisionary powers
5) Procedures during revision
6) Powers on revision & possible outcomes of revision

27
Q

APPLICATION FOR REVISION TO HIGH COURT

Overview

A

1) Jurisdiction & powers to revise
2) Object of revisionary power
3) Appeal or revision
4) Invoking revisionary powers
5) Procedures during revision
6) Powers on revision & possible outcomes of revision

28
Q

APPLICATION FOR REVISION TO HIGH COURT

Jurisdiction & powers to revise

A

In CJA:

  • S.31: revision of criminal proceedings of sub-courts
  • S.35: general supervisory & revisionary jurisdiction of HC.

2) In CPC:

  • S.323:
  • S.324:
  • S.325:
  • S.326:
  • S.327:
29
Q

APPLICATION FOR REVISION TO HIGH COURT

Object of revisionary power

A

Hari Ram Seghal v PP:

  • to correct any miscarriage of justice;
  • not only from error of judgment & procedure but from neglect or indolence part of those in authority.
30
Q

APPLICATION FOR REVISION TO HIGH COURT

Appeal or revision

A

1) PP v Rozita Mohamad Ali:
- the prosecution must choose to proceed with the appeal or revision if both matters are before the HC.

Whether can be used to replace appeal when time for appeal has expired:

1) Nuzul Ikhram v PP:
- revision cannot be used to circumvent the process of appeal when time limited for appeal has expired & no application for extension has been made.
2) Dorai Manickam v P:

  • procedure of revision should not be resorted to where the decision complained of is appealable and no appeal has been lodged.
  • this may amount to abuse of process.
31
Q

APPLICATION FOR REVISION TO HIGH COURT

Invoking revisionary powers

A

1) When - PP v Muhari bin Mohd Jani:

  • On HC’s own motion upon becoming aware of the irregularities or illegalities in the proceedings in the subordinate courts;
  • On a formal application filed by parties, i.e. PP or Accused;
  • on formal or informal application by non-party, i.e. letter from the victim.

2) Test to invoke revisionary powers - Knight Glenn Jayasingam v PP:
- Be satisfied that the irregularity or otherwise noted in the notes of proceedings resulted in a grave or serious injustice;
3) Exercise of revisionary powers - PP v Roslan Imun:
- to be exercised sparingly and only when there appears to have been miscarriage of justice or a perverse or unreasonable decision.
4) Absence of record of proceedings - Hari Ram Seghal v PP:
- court cannot exercise its revisionary powers to correct any miscarriage of justice where the record of proceedings is unavailable.
5) Confined to record of proceedings - PP v Audrey Keong Mei Cheng:
- HC in exercising its revisionary power must confine itself to the record of the proceedings.

32
Q

APPLICATION FOR REVISION TO HIGH COURT

Procedures during revision

A

1) General rule:
- S.326 CPC + S.36: Parties has no right to be heard.
2) Exception:
- S.325(2) CPC + proviso to S.36: No order against accused unless he is heard.
3) Right of prosecution - PP v Mohamed Tarmizi:
- prosecution also afford a right to be heard before HC make any order in invoking its revisionary powers.

33
Q

APPLICATION FOR REVISION TO HIGH COURT

Powers on revision & possible outcomes of revision

A

1) The law:
- S.325
2) Scope:
- Acquittal cannot be converted to conviction.