Chapter 16 - Law, Society, and the Mental Health Profession Flashcards
does psychological dysfunction occur in isolation?
no, psychological dysfunction affects more than just the individual
what system defines and often regulates the professional responsibilities of clinicians?
a complex social system of societal institutions
3 major forces in society
the legislation/judicial system, the business/economic arena, and technology
collective term for the legislative and judicial systems
the “legal field”
what is the legal field responsible for
protecting both the public good and the rights of individuals
two distinct aspects of the relationship between mental health field and legal field
mental health professionals play a role in the criminal justice system (“psychology in law”) and legal systems act upon the clinical field (“law in psychology”)
forensic psychology
the collective term for the intersections between the mental health field and the legal and judicial systems
the varied activities of forensic psychologists
testifying in trials, researching the reliability of eyewitness testimony, or helping police profile the personality of a serial killer on the loose
what do courts need to know before they can arrive at just and appropriate punishments?
they need to know if the defendant is responsible for the crimes they commit and capable of defending themselves in court
criminal commitment
the process where someone accused of crimes is sent to a mental institution for treatment because they are judged to be mentally unstable
two forms of criminal commitment
person was mentally unstable at time of the crime and person is mentally unstable at time of the trial
plea for people who were mentally unstable at the time of the crime(s) and are innocent of wrongdoing
not guilty by reason of insanity
someone who was mentally unstable at the time of the crime are released from treatment when
they improve enough to be mentally stable
someone who is mentally unstable at the time of the trial is released from treatment when
they are competent enough to understand the trial procedures and to defend themselves in court
criticism of judgments of mental instability
judgments are loopholes that allow criminals to escape punishment
what kind of term is the term “insanity”
a legal term
who can the M’Naghten test be traced back to?
to the murder case of Daniel M’Naghten in England in 1843
the M’Naghten test
the defendant had to be unable to know right from wrong at the time of the crime
when was the irresistible impulse test first used?
in Ohio in 1834
the irresistible impulse test
a person who committed a crime during an uncontrollable “fit of passion” was considered insane and not guilty
when was the Durham test made?
in 1954 as a result of the case of Durham v. United States
the Durham test
people are not criminally responsible if their “unlawful acts was the product of mental disease or mental defect”
issue with the Durham test
anyone who fits the criteria of any disorder in the DSM-I would be considered “insane”
when was the American Law Institute test made?
in 1955
the American Law Institute test (in class called the American Legal Institute Rule)
people are not criminally responsible if, at the time of a crime, they had a mental disorder or defect that prevented them from knowing right from wrong or from being able to control themselves and to follow the law
American Psychiatric Association’s 1983 statement on legal insanity
people should be found not guilty by reason of insanity only if they did not know right from wrong at the time of the crime
states that got rid of the insanity plea altogther
Idaho, Kansas, Montana, and Utah
percent of people who are found not guilty by reason of insanity who have schizophrenia or another form of psychosis
80%
percent of people who successfully plead insanity that are white
50%
percent of people who successfully plead insanity that are male
86%
mean age of people who successfully plead insanity
32 years old
fraction of crimes for which defendants are found not guilty by reason of insanity that are violent crimes
2/3
percent of those found not guilty by reason of insanity that are accused of murder
15-30%
concerns raised by the insanity defense
the fundamental difference between the law and the science of human behavior; the uncertainty of scientific knowledge about abnormal behavior
problem which clinicians face when evaluating state of mind of defendant during the crime
the event took place weeks, months, or years earlier
percent of defendants who plead insanity
less than 1%
percent of defendants who plead insanity and are actually found not guilty for reason of insanity
25%
amount of people who are found not guilty by reason of insanity of every 400 defendants
1 of every 400 defendants
percentage of insanity pleas that are agreed to by the prosecution
75%
causes behind the trend of defendants being released earlier and earlier from mental institutions
increasing effectiveness of therapy in institutions, the growing reaction against extended institutionalization, and more emphasis on patients’ rights
Foucha v. Louisiana 1992, what did the supreme court clarify?
that the only acceptable basis for determining the release of hospitalized offenders is whether or not they are still “insane”
outpatient commitment
the states may insist on community treatment, monitor the patients closely, and rehospitalize them if neccessary
what other verdicts besides not guilty by reason of insanity are available?
guilty but mentally ill, guilty with diminished capacity
guilty but mentally ill
defendants who receive this verdict are found to have had a mental illness at the time of their crime, but the illness was not fully related to or responsible for the crime
guilty with diminished capacity
a defendant’s mental dysfunction is viewed as an extenuating circumstance that the court should take into consideration in determining the precise crime of which the person is guilty
why do many legal experts have argued against the diminished capacity defense
because of possible miscarriages of justice
when did Michigan passed the first sexual psychopath law
1937
purpose of sexual psychopath laws
some of those who are repeatedly found guilty of sex crimes have a mental disorder, so the state categorizes them as “mentally disordered sex offenders”
where are mentally disordered sex offenders sent to?
a mental health facility
“sexually violent predator” or “sexually dangerous person” laws
sex offenders removed from prison before their release and committed involuntarily to a mental hospital for treatment if a court judges them likely to engage in further “predatory acts of sexual violence” as a result of “mental abnormality” or “personality disorder”
supreme court case that upheld the constitutionality of the sexually violent predator laws
1997 case of Kansas v. Hendricks
why can a person be judged mentally incompetent to stand trial?
to ensure that the defendant understands the charges they are facing and can work with their lawyers to prepare and conduct an adequate defense
Supreme Court upholds the minimum of the defendant being competent in this case
Dusky v. United States in 1960
number of competency evaluations conducted in the United States every year
50,000-60,000
percent of defendants who are evaluated for competency that are found incompetent to stand trial
20-25%
supreme court ruling that addressed indefinite commitment
Johnson v. Indiana in 1972
until the early 1970s, most states required that mentally incompetent defendants be committed to what kind of place
maximum security institution for the “criminally insane”
jail diversion
the disturbed person is “diverted” from jail to the community for mental health care
civil commitment
certain people are forced into mental health treatment
people who are subjected to civil commitment
people who are unaware of their psychological problems or those who are not interested in going through therapy
where are people who are committed involuntarily sent to?
mental facilities
in what circumstance would the US legal system permit involuntary (civil) commitment?
when the individual being committed is in need of treatment and dangerous to themselves or others
in what ways might someone be dangerous to themselves?
if they are suicidal or if they act recklessly
in what ways might someone be dangerous to others?
if the individual seeks to harm others or if they unintentionally place others at risk
is a hearing necessary when committing a minor?
no, a hearing is not necessary as long as a qualified mental health professional considers commitment necessary
process of being involuntarily committed as an adult
the court orders a mental examination and allow the person to contest the commitment in court, often represented by a lawyer