Chapter 16 Flashcards
INTRODUCTION
Symptoms of an Out-of-Control Company
- Lax top management - senior managers do not emphasize or value the need for controls, or they set a bad example.
- Absence of policies - the firm’s expectations are not established in writing.
- Lack of agreed upon standards - organization members are unclear about what needs to be achieved.
- “Shoot the messenger” management - employees that feel their careers would be at risk if they reported bad news.
- Lack of periodic reviews - managers do not assess performance on a regular, timely basis.
- Bad information systems - key data are not measured and reported in a timely and easily accessible way.
- Lack of ethics in the culture - organization members have not internalized commitment to integrity.
INTRODUCTION
control
- any process that direct the activities of individuals toward the achievement of organizational goals
INTRODUCTION
market control
- Control based on the use of pricing mechanisms and economic information to regulate activities within the organization
- Business units may be treated as profit centers and trade resources (services or goods) with one another via such mechanisms.
- managers who run these units may be evaluated on the basis of profit and loss
- uses prices, competition, profit centers, and exchange relationships
- works best where tangible output can be identified and a market can be established between parties
INTRODUCTION
bureaucratic control
- The use of rules, regulations, and authority to guide performance
- it includes such items as budgets, statistical reports, and performance appraisals to regulate behavior and results
- works best where tasks are certain and workers are independent
INTRODUCTION
clan control
- Control based on the norms, values, shared goals, and trust among group members
- also known as cultural control
- when members of an organization have common values and goals – and trust one another – formal controls may be less necessary
- works best where there is no one best way to do a job, and employees are empowered to make decisions
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
Four Steps of Control Cycle
- Set performance standards
- Measure performance
- Compare performance with standards
- Reward successes, correct problems
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
1. Setting performance standards
- Performance standards can be set with respect to :
1. Quantity
2. Quality
3. Time used
4. Cost - many important aspects of performance, such as customer service, can be measured by the same standards – adequate supply and availability of products, quality of service, speed of delivery, and so forth
- The downside of establishing performance targets and standards is that they may not be supported by other elements of the control system
- each piece of the system is important and depends on the others
- otherwise the system can get terribly out of balance
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
standard
- expected performance for a given goal: a target that establishes a desired performance level, motivates performance, and serves as a benchmark against which actual performance is assessed
- Standards can be set for any activity – financial activities, operating activities, legal compliance, charitable contributions, and so on
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
2. Measuring Performance
- for example, managers can count units produced, days absent, papers filed, samples distributed, and dollars earned
- performance data commonly are obtained from three sources:
1. Written reports - include computer printouts and on screen reports. Thanks to computers’ data-gathering and analysis capabilities and decreasing costs, both large and small companies can gather huge amounts of performance data.
2. Oral reports - One example of oral reports occurs when a sales person contacts his or her immediate manager at the close of each business day to report the accomplishments, problems, or customers’ reactions during the day. The manager can ask questions to gain additional information or clear up any misunderstandings. When necessary, tentative corrective actions can be worked out during the discussion.
3. Personal observations - involves going to the area where activities take place and watching what is occurring. The manager can directly observe work methods, employees’ nonverbal signals, and the general operation. Personal observation gives a detailed picture of what is going on, but it also has some disadvantages. It does not provide accurate quantitative data; the information usually is general and subjective. Also, employees can misunderstand the purpose of personal observation as mistrust or lack of confidence. Still, many managers believe in the value of first-hand observation.
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
3. Comparing Performance with the Standard
- in this process, the manager evaluates the performance
- for some activities, relatively small deviations from the standard are acceptable, whereas in others a slight deviation may be more serious
- with principle of exception, only exceptional cases require corrective action
- the principle is important in controlling
- The manager is not concerned with performance that equals or closely approximates the expected results.
- managers can save much time and effort if they apply the principle of exception.
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
principle of exception
- A managerial principal stating that control is enhanced by concentrating on the exceptions to or significant deviations from the expected results or standard
- in comparing performance with the standard, managers need to direct their attention to the exception – for example, a handful of defective components produced on an assembly line or the feedback from customers who are upset or delighted with a service.
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
4. Taking Action to Correct Problems and Reinforce Successes
- this step ensures that operations are adjusted to achieve the planned results – or to continue exceeding the plan if the manager determines that is possible
- in cases in which significant variances are discovered, the manager usually takes immediate and vigorous action
- when corrective action is needed to solve a systemic problem, such as major delays in workflow, often a team approach is most effective
- A corrective action is more likely to have greater acceptance in the organization if it is based on a common effort and takes into account multiple points of view
- knowledgeable team members can often prevent managers from implementing simplistic solutions that don’t address the underlying causes of a problem
- they are more likely to take into account the effects of any solution on other parts of the organization, preventing new problems from arising later
- and they may well develop solutions that managers might not have considered on their own
- as a result, any corrective action that is finally adopted will probably be more effective
- an important added benefit of bringing employees together to develop corrective action is that it helps managers build and reinforce an organizationwide culture of high standards
- after trying corrective action, a growing number of organizations conduct an after action review
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
after-action review
- a frank and open-minded discussion of four basic questions aimed at continuous improvement
- questions for an after-action review :
1. What were our intended results? (What was planned?)
2. What were our actual results? (What really happened?)
3. What caused our results? (Why did it happen?)
4. What will we sustain? Improve? (What can we do better next time?)
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
feedforward control
- The control process used before operations begin, including policies, procedures, and rules designed to ensure that planned activities are carried out properly
- examples include inspection of raw materials and proper selection and training of employees
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
concurrent control
- The control process used while plans are being carried out, including directing, monitoring, and fine-tuning activities as they are performed
- is in effect when supervisors watch employees to ensure they work efficiently and avoid mistakes
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
feedback control
- Control that focuses on the use of information about previous results to correct deviations from the acceptable standard
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
management audit
- an evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of various systems within an organization
- management audits may be internal or external
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
external audit
- an evaluation conducted by one organization, such as a CPA firm, on another
- any company can conduct external audits of competitors or other companies for it’s own strategic decision making purposes
- this type of analysis :
1. Investigates other organizations for possible merger or acquisition
2. Determines the soundness of a company that will be used as a major supplier
3. Discovers the strengths and weaknesses of a competitor to maintain or better exploit the competitive advantage of the investigating organization - publicly available data usually are used for these evaluations
- Provide an essential feedback control when they identify legal and ethical lapses that could harm the organization and its reputation
- they are also useful for preliminary control because they can prevent problems from occurring
- if a company seeking to acquire other businesses gathers adequate, accurate information about possible candidates, it is more likely to acquire the most appropriate companies and avoid unsound acquisitions
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
internal audit
- A periodic assessment of a company’s own planning, organizing, leading, and controlling processes
- assesses :
1. What company has done for itself
2. What it has done for its customers or other recipients of its goods or services - The company can be evaluated on a number of factors, including financial stability, production efficiency, sales effectiveness, human resources development, earnings growth, energy use, public relations, civic responsibility, and other criteria of organizational effectiveness
- The audit reviews the company’s past, present, and future, including any risks the organization should be prepared to face
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
budgeting
- The process of investigating what is being done and comparing the results with the corresponding budget data to verify accomplishments or remedy differences
- A primary consideration for budgeting is the length of the budget.
- all budgets are prepared for a specific time period; Many budgets cover one, three, or six months or one year
- The budge period Commonly coincides with other control devices such as managerial reports, balance sheets, and statements of profit and loss
- in addition, the extent to which reasonable forecast can be made to be considered in selecting the length of the budgets
- several stages :
- expectancies – starts with a broad plan for the company and the estimate of sales, and it ends with budget approval and publication
- next, the budgetary operations stage deals with finding out what is being accomplished and comparing the results with expectancies
- The last stage, as in any control process, involves responding appropriately with some combination of reinforcing successes and correcting problem
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
Types of Budgets
- Sales budget - usually data for the sales budget include forecasts of the sales by month, sales area, and product.
- Production budget - The production budget commonly is expressed in physical units. Required information for preparing this budget includes types and capacities of machines, economic quantities to produce, and availability of materials.
- Cost budget - The cost budget is used for areas of the organization that incur expenses but no revenue, such as human resources and other support departments. Cost budgets may also be included in the production budget. Costs may be fixed, or independent of the immediate level of activity (such as rent), or variable, rising or falling with the level of activity (such as raw materials).
- Cash budget - the cash budget is essential to every business. It should be prepared after all other budget estimates are completed. The cash budget shows the anticipated receipts and expenditures, the amount of working capital available, the extent to which outside financing may be required, and the periods and amounts of cash available.
- Capital budget - The capital budget is used for the cost of fixed assets such as plants and equipment. Such costs are usually treated not as regular expenses but as investments because of their long-term nature and importance to the organization’s productivity.
- Master budget - The master budget includes all the major activities of the business. It brings together and coordinates all the activities of the other budgets and can be thought of as a budget of budgets.
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
accounting audits
- procedures used to verify accounting reports and statements
- is performed by members of an outside firm of public accountants
- knowing that accounting records are accurate, true, and in keeping with generally accepted accounting processes (GAAP) creates confident that a reliable base exists for sound overall controlling purposes
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
activity-based costing (ABC)
- A method of cost accounting designed to identify streams of activity and then to allocate costs across particular business processes according to the amount of time employees devote to particular activities
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
balance sheet
- A report that shows the financial picture of a company at a given time and itemizes assets, liabilities, and stockholders’ equity
- summarizing balance sheet items over a long period of time uncovers important trends and gives a manager further insight into overall performance and areas in which adjustments need to be made
- Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders’ Equity
BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
assets
- The values of the various items the corporation owns