Chapter 15: Portfolio Transfers Flashcards
Companies can use portfolio transfers to seek to exist from either (3)
- single lines of business
- a group of different lines of business
- complete portfolios
5 Possible reasons for companies seeking to exit from business
- the business requires a disproportionate amount of senior management time and/or capital for its size
- the business was purchased as part of a larger acquisition, but was not the reason for undertaking the transaction
- the business has been, or is expected to be, loss making or not sufficiently profitable
- the company may have become insolvent and forced by its regulator to cease writing new business
- a combination of these
Run-off to exhaustion
The company ceases to write any new business or renewals in the lines being exited, but continues to retain responsibility for administering and paying the claims for the historical business.
- business functions (e.g. claims handling) have to be maintained
- as the level of underwritten business decreases over time this strategy becomes expensive to administer
- outsourcing certain administrative functions to specialist run-off providers can reduce these costs
- this exist strategy is often used as an interim solution while alternative exist strategies are considered.
Reinsurance (as an exist strategy_
All future claims that may arise from historical business is reinsured.
- the insurer can allow the reinsurer to administer and settle all future claims, in which case a binder agreement will be required
- level of risk transfer achieved depends on the specific terms of reinsurance (lower limits, caps at upper limits, aggregate constraints, etc.)
- if the reinsurer defaults, the ultimate responsibility of paying claims still lies with the insurer
- the insurer will still need to include the business in its regulatory reporting
If the business is reinsured, the parties will negotiate the reinsurance premium and it is likely to depend on (8)
- the estimated cost of the liabilities, given the precise structure of the reinsurance
- the uncertainty around this estimated cost
- anticipated future investment return
- cost of ongoing administration
- the capital required to support the liabilities
- the financial strength of the reinsurer
- the required return on capital (or profit loading)
- the availability of such reinsurance in the market
Scheme for the transfer of insurance business
Complete transfer.
Part V of Section 36 of the STIA 1998
A successful substitution requires an agreement between 3 parties
- policyholder
- new insurer
- old insurer
4 Steps to initiate a transfer
- Apply for the Registrar’s approval
- The Registrar determines whether information submitted is sufficient
- The Registrar indicates whether he is satisfied
- Within a period of 60 days after the transfer, the public officers fill in Annexure 6 stating that the transfer was done as per the Registrar’s approval.
2 insurers will negotiate the amount payable for the substitutions, considering (5)
- the valuation of the ultimate liabilities
- the uncertainty surrounding the valuation
- capital implications
- reinsurance requirements
- return on equity required
- administering costs or savings for each party
Sale of business:
Selling whole comapnies
- Achieves complete finality for the insurer.
- Not very flexible
- On some occasions the seller will have to retain certain liabilities, such as claims arising from a historical event with great uncertainty.
- Buyers may find this strategy appealing as it affords a quick entry to a market (all FSB requirements, etc. will already be in place).
Sale of business:
Selling other assets
- An example of this would be selling reinsurance assets
- Typically done when reinsurance recoveries are uncertain. As a result, the asset is sold for much less than the expected recovery.
- The short-term insurer will have to seek the Registrar’s approval before it can allow its assets to be held by another person.
Typical considerations when deciding on methods and bases for valuing the liabilities would be (7)
- negotiating strength
- the initiator of the deal
- risk appetite
- the uncertainty, length of tail, etc.
- the views of regulators
- recommendations of oversight persons/bodies e.g. FSB, independent experts, Lloyd’s
- the opinions of reinsurers (possibly)
4 Possible exist strategies
- run-off to exhaustion
- reinsurance
- scheme for the transfer of insurance business (substitution)
- sale of the business
What are the potential downsides to outsourcing functions of the insurer?
QUESTION 1
Why is it important to obtain policyholder consent for a transfer?
QUESTION 2