Chapter 14- Habitat selection, Territoriality, and Migration Flashcards
Domestication of steelhead trout study
Researchers wanted to determine how quickly natural selection can act after a habitat changes. They bred pairs of wild caught trout and pairs of first generation hatchery raised trout. Offspring from all pairs were raised in the hatchery environment, and an mRNA molecular genetic analysis examined differences in the offspring of the WW and HH matings. They found heritable differences in gene expression in a large number of genes. Most differences in gene expression were associated with wound healing, immunity, and metabolism. HH offspring showed generally higher levels of gene expression. This makes sense because crowded environments like a hatchery can facilitate aggression and the spread of disease. The results suggest that evolution can act over only 2 generations
Relationship between habitat and behavior
An animal’s habitat affects its behavior, but its behavior also affects its habitat
Home range
Areas an animal passes through but does not spend much time in any specific one
Territory
An area occupied and defended by an animal
Abiotic factors
Factors like heat, availability of water, wind, refuge from danger, and availability of specific nutrients. Can impact habitat choice in combination with biotic factors
Biotic factors
Factors like location of mates, food, predators, and parasites. Can impact habitat choice along with abiotic factors
Migration
When animals make a shift in habitats, where they move over long distances. Some animals, like birds, migrate for a period of time and then return to their territory. Typically involves moving between a region where young are reared (breeding range) and nonbreeding region
Habitat choice
How animals distribute themselves in space and time with respect to resources in their environment
Ideal free distribution model
Addresses what behavioral rules animals use to distribute themselves between habitats. The model is used to predict the equilibrium frequency of individuals in different patches. Considers how many units of food each habitat provides per minute, along with the number of individuals in the population to determine how many individuals in the population should end up in each habitat
What does the IFD model predict for the equilibrium distribution?
It predicts that the equilibrium distribution of individuals into patches should be the distribution at which, if any individual moved from the patch it was in, it would suffer a cost. At IFD equilibrium, and individual that moved from one habitat to the other would obtain fewer resources as a result of the move. This translates to individuals settling in habitats in proportion to the resources available in that patch.
Mathematically, when is equilibrium reached in the IFD model?
Equilibrium is reached when R1N1=R2N2. R is the amount of resources and N is the number of individuals in the habitat
IFD model of foraging in sticklebacks
The foraging behavior of fish was observed in two treatments. In one treatment, 5 times as much food was released at one feeder than the other. In the other treatment, the ratio was 2:1. The fish in both treatments distributed themselves under feeders in a ratio similar to the resource matching rule of the IFD model. This study did not examine foraging success, however.
IFD model of foraging in mallards
The ducks were given food in patches of varying profitability. Profitability was manipulated by varying the number of pieces of food or the weight of each piece. When equal amounts of food were thrown into patches, ducks quickly distributed themselves in a 1:1 ratio. As predicted by the IFD model, when one patch had twice as much food as the other, the ducks distributed themselves in a 2:1 ratio
Ideal despotic distribution model
In the IFD model in mallard ducks, some ducks were more aggressive, and therefore all individuals did not receive the same amount of food across patches. This model takes aggression into account
2 ways evolution can act on behavioral traits to minimize exposure to disease
- Avoidance of habitats that contain pathogens
- Avoidance of individuals that are already ill
How can individuals reduce the risk of infection from parasitic disease in their offspring?
They can produce offspring in habitats that have low parasite levels. Amphibians carry many parasitic pathogens and are able to distinguish between oviposition sites based on a wide variety of characteristics.
Oviposition in treefrogs
Treefrogs base their decision on where to lay eggs based on the presence of a specific snail in their habitat. The snail is an intermediate host for a harmful parasite. Researchers wanted to determine whether treefrogs can distinguish between sites with the snails and whether they take into account the density of snails present. It was found that gray treefrogs favored ponds with no snails. They also were less likely to lay eggs in areas with a higher snail density.
Which hormones impact spatial memory?
High levels of glucocorticoid hormones (stress hormones) interfere with spatial memory skills. Corticosterone is an example.
Impact of corticosterone on spatial memory and habitat choice in rats
Rats were placed in a dark water tank with a platform that could serve as a resting place. When placed in the tank, rats swam around randomly and then discovered the platform- they got better at finding the platform with additional trials. Researchers hypothesized that a stress induced increase in corticosterone would impact the rats’ ability to find the platform. Rats were split into groups and received shocks at varying time intervals before water maze trials. The performance of the rats who received shocks a few minutes and a few hours before the trial was not impacted. The rats who received a shock 30 minutes before the trial did show impaired memory for the location of the platform, and they also had increased levels of corticosterone, suggesting the hormone has a memory inhibiting role
In additional water trial experiments with rats, what happened when corticosterone production was inhibited?
Rats were injected with a drug called metyrapone, which blocks chemical signals in the adrenal glands and inhibits corticosterone production. With the drug, rats that were shocked before their trial did not show impaired memory and retained the ability to find the platform. In addition, rats who were injected with corticosterone but not shocked before the trial showed impaired memory
Territoriality
The occupation and defense of a particular area. Territories provide their owners with access to food, mates, and shelter from predators. However, defending a territory can be costly in time and energy
Group territoriality
Territories are sometimes defended by groups of individuals instead of a single individual or a family. This can result in dramatic between group interactions as one group tries to enlarge their territory by taking another group’s territory, similar to tribal raiding behavior in humans. This occurs in chimps as well
Raiding behavior in chimpanzees
All male chimpanzee patrol groups travel into areas that border their territorial boundaries. These chimps do not emit the vocalizations that are typical of foraging behavior- they move cautiously and silently. Raids can result in killing a small number of the other group and capturing females. If two raiding groups encounter each other, they engage in hostile vocalizations and withdraw
The role of learning in territory formation in anolis aeneus lizards
These lizards form territories early in life, and researchers examined how juveniles decided to stake out a territory. In this case, there was no effect of food availability in territoriality. However, safety from predators and appropriate temperatures were important in selecting a territory. Researchers hypothesized that lizards learned how to determine territory quality by watching other members of their species. If one individual is already using a territory, it must be suitable. This is called conspecific cuing
Conspecific cuing model of territoriality
The idea that animals learn which territories are suitable by watching which territories are selected by other members of the species
Conspecific cueing model of territoriality in lizards
Researchers examined whether a territory that had been occupied in the past but was now vacant would be attractive to lizards. When given a choice between a vacant territory and an occupied territory, the juvenile lizards chose the occupied territory once the territory owner was removed. This trend only occurred when the lizards were able to observe the territory being occupied
Optimal skew theory
Studies the distribution of breeding within a group and whether there will be cooperation or conflict over reproductive activities. Sometimes it’s in the best interests of the family for an individual to stay at home and not breed in order to help out with siblings
Parent-offspring conflict over breeding opportunities in white fronted bee eaters
Young male white-fronted bee eaters often remain on their natal territory and help their parents with raising their siblings. There is no conflict between the young male and their parents if breeding opportunities are rare. However, there may be conflict if the male has the opportunity to mate and leave home. Parents receive a greater benefit in fitness if their son stays than if the son leaves because parents are more related to their offspring than their grand offspring. A male is equally related to his siblings and offspring, so there is no incentive for a male to resist his parents’ attempt to suppress his breeding. There is more resistance if an individual attempts to stop other kin or non kin from breeding