chapter 14 Flashcards
- A judicial decision that establishes a rule for settling subsequent cases of a similar nature is a
A. writ of certiorari.
B. landmark decision.
C. writ of mandamus.
D. precedent.
E. writ of error.
D. precedent.
- The power of the Supreme Court is most apparent in its ability to
A. issue advisory opinions when Congress is considering a new bill.
B. impeach federal judges who consistently ignore its rulings.
C. declare another institution’s action to be unconstitutional.
D. override any decision of a state court.
E. issue advisory opinions to the president on a regular basis.
C. declare another institution’s action to be unconstitutional.
- A writ of certiorari is
A. a request to a lower court to submit to the Supreme Court a record of the case it has been requested to hear.
B. the statement explaining the reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision.
C. the official transcript of Supreme Court proceedings.
D. a statement from a group not directly involved in a Supreme Court case, indicating the group’s opinion on the legal issue at hand.
E. an application for a waiver of court fees due to indigence.
A. a request to a lower court to submit to the Supreme Court a record of the case it has been requested to hear.
- A concurring opinion
A. explains the chief justice’s position on a case.
B. is a separate view written by a justice who votes with the majority but disagrees with its reasoning.
C. is delivered when the Court interprets a constitutional issue.
D. is delivered when at least two justices, but less than a majority, hold the same opinion in a case.
E. explains why the Court accepted the case in the first place.
B. is a separate view written by a justice who votes with the majority but disagrees with its reasoning.
- Regarding Supreme Court procedures, which one of the following statements is NOT accurate?
A. When part of the majority, the chief justice decides which justice will write the majority opinion.
B. A concurring opinion is a view written by a justice who votes with the majority and agrees with its reasoning.
C. A dissenting opinion is an opinion of a judge who votes against the majority.
D. Attorneys who argue a case before the Supreme Court operate under strict time limits.
E. The Court has broad standards in choosing the cases it will hear.
B. A concurring opinion is a view written by a justice who votes with the majority and agrees with its reasoning.
- Compared with the decision in a Supreme Court case, the opinion is more significant because it
A. determines the losing party in a case and the penalty to be imposed on this party.
B. reveals the conflicts between the justices, which the president and Congress can use in determining their position on judicial appointments and new legislation.
C. informs others of the Court’s interpretation of the laws and thereby guides their decisions.
D. addresses the constitutional aspects of a case, whereas the decision addresses the statutory aspects.
E. None of these answers is correct.
C. informs others of the Court’s interpretation of the laws and thereby guides their decisions.
- A written Supreme Court opinion that, in the absence of a majority opinion, represents the reasoning of most of the justices who side with the winning party is a
A. plurality opinion.
B. concurring opinion.
C. leading opinion.
D. prevailing opinion.
E. per curiam.
A. plurality opinion.
- The federal district courts
A. are the chief trial courts of the federal system.
B. are the only federal courts where the two sides present their case to a jury for a verdict.
C. are the courts that, in practice, make the final decision in most federal cases.
D. exist in each state.
E. All these answers are correct.
E. All these answers are correct.
- With regard to the lower courts, the Supreme Court’s primary responsibility is
A. establishing legal precedents that will guide their decisions.
B. correcting any technical mistakes the lower courts make in the cases they hear.
C. settling jurisdictional disputes among federal judges.
D. settling jurisdictional disputes between state and federal judges.
E. All these answers are correct.
A. establishing legal precedents that will guide their decisions.
- Although federal district courts are theoretically bound by Supreme Court precedents, they sometimes deviate because
A. the facts of a case are seldom precisely the same as those of similar cases decided by the Supreme Court.
B. federal judges may misunderstand the Court’s judicial reasoning or position.
C. ambiguities or unaddressed issues in Supreme Court rulings give lower courts some flexibility in deciding cases.
D. of all these factors: the facts of a case are seldom precisely the same as those of similar cases decided by the Supreme Court; federal judges may misunderstand the Court’s judicial reasoning or position; and ambiguities or unaddressed issues in the Court’s rulings give lower courts some flexibility in deciding cases.
E. None of these answers is correct.
D. of all these factors: the facts of a case are seldom precisely the same as those of similar cases decided by the Supreme Court; federal judges may misunderstand the Court’s judicial reasoning or position; and ambiguities or unaddressed issues in the Court’s rulings give lower courts some flexibility in deciding cases.
- The U.S. courts of appeals
A. hear new evidence in appealed cases.
B. review trial court decisions.
C. are the highest courts to use juries.
D. decide for the Supreme Court the cases it will review.
E. None of these answers is correct.
B. review trial court decisions.
- The appointment of federal judges is influenced most substantially by
A. partisanship.
B. logrolling.
C. pork barreling.
D. affirmative action.
E. personal friendships.
A. partisanship.
- The “federal court myth” overlooks the fact that
A. most cases arise under state law, not federal law.
B. nearly all cases that originate in state courts are never reviewed by federal courts.
C. federal courts must normally accept the facts of a case as determined by a state court when reviewing its decision.
D. most cases arise under state law, not federal law; nearly all cases that originate in state courts are never reviewed by federal courts; and federal courts must normally accept the facts of a case as determined by a state court when reviewing its decision.
E. None of these answers is correct.
D. most cases arise under state law, not federal law; nearly all cases that originate in state courts are never reviewed by federal courts; and federal courts must normally
- Senatorial courtesy refers to the tradition whereby
A. nominees for federal judgeships are treated with respect during Senate confirmation hearings, even by senators who plan to vote against the nominee.
B. senators usually defer to the president’s choice of Supreme Court nominees.
C. senators are consulted on the nomination of lower-court federal judgeships in their state.
D. nominations for the federal courts, once committee hearings are concluded, are scheduled for a vote ahead of other Senate business.
E. House members always defer to the Senate on matters dealing with the judiciary.
C. senators are consulted on the nomination of lower-court federal judgeships in their state.
- When asked if he had made any mistakes as president, ________ replied, “Yes, two, and they are both sitting on the Supreme Court”.
A. Ronald Reagan
B. Jimmy Carter
C. Richard Nixon
D. Lyndon Johnson
E. Dwight Eisenhower
E. Dwight Eisenhower
- According to the Constitution, the federal courts can issue a decision only
A. in response to actual legal cases.
B. in cases where the U.S. government is one of the parties involved in the dispute.
C. on cases heard previously by a state court and appealed by the losing party.
D. in cases where the U.S. government is one of the parties involved in the dispute, and where the cases were heard previously by a state court and appealed by the losing party.
E. None of these answers is correct.
- The long-serving chief justice that established the principle of judicial review was
A. Charles Evans Hughes.
B. Hugo Black.
C. Clarence Thomas.
D. John Marshall.
E. Benjamin Cardozo.
D. John Marshall.
- The facts of a case
A. are largely irrelevant, in that the judiciary has wide freedom with decisions.
B. affect which law or laws will apply to the case.
C. are important only if the case involves a statutory dispute.
D. are important only if the case involves a constitutional dispute.
E. are important about 50 percent of the time.
B. affect which law or laws will apply to the case.
- The judiciary’s status as an independent branch of national government depends on judicial review, which grants the judiciary the authority to
A. make political decisions; judges can overturn any congressional or presidential decision they personally dislike.
B. decide which laws apply to a particular case.
C. ignore public opinion when making decisions.
D. invalidate the actions of other institutions when judges believe they have acted unconstitutionally.
E. strike down certain sections of the Constitution.
D. invalidate the actions of other institutions when judges believe they have acted unconstitutionally.
- The term stare decisis refers to
A. adherence to precedent.
B. judicial activism.
C. judicial restraint.
D. judicial review.
E. excessive partisanship.
A. adherence to precedent.
- An amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief provides a court with the view held by
A. an interest that is not a direct party to the case.
B. the Justice Department.
C. the House and Senate judiciary committees.
D. the American Bar Association.
E. the solicitor general.
A. an interest that is not a direct party to the case.