Chapter 14 Flashcards
randomized experiment
Assigning a group randomly to the control or experimental group
placebo
Control group receives
Inert or ineffective treatment
experimental subject/unit
Units randomized to control or experimental group
random assignment
Used to provide or withhold an intervention or treatment following a procedure to flipping a coin
Researcher must randomize assignment of the IV
Participants randomly assigned to treatment and control groups
Helps ensure all groups are identical on all z variables
Have random assignment but not random sample
statistical equivalence
Balances the treatment and control groups in terms of both measured and unmeasured variables with bounds of chance as differences
Experiments are the “gold standard” for getting close to causality
Note: we still can’t observe causation here. The book does a bad job of explaining this
But, out of all the research designs we have, it the design that generally gives us the most confidence in arguing for cause and effect
haphazard randomization
Less formal procedure that mimics true random assignment
why random assignment?
Statistical equivalence on all variables
randomized experiment
Seeks to isolate the causal relationship between one explanatory variable, the treatment (x) and one or more response variables or outcomes (y)
Treatment → outcome or x → y
exogenous
X, the treatment is known to independent from and uncorrelated with all the other variables causing y
experiments have what kind of internal and external validity
high internal low external
internal validity
Confidence that the effect of X on Y is real
external validity
Confidence that relationship between X and Y generalized beyond experiment
threats to internal validity
Internal - differences between participants in treatment and control groups (other than X)
selection
Individuals selected into treatment are different from those in control
experiment mortality
Ppl. turning out and not receiving treatment
Only threat if creates difference between treatment and control group so if don’t mess up random assignment should be no threat
threats to external validity
any differences between participants in study v. non participants and setting of lab v. real world
unrepresentative population
doesn’t represent real world
realism
setting we are in for experiment does not look anything like real world where might get this treatment
mundane realism
events look way they do in real world
experimental realism
subjects don’t take the experiment seriously