Chapter 11: Project Analysis and Evaluation Flashcards

1
Q

There are two circumstances under which a discounted cash flow analysis could lead us to conclude that a project has a positive NPV

A

1) The first possibility is that the project really does have a positive NPV
2) The second possibility: a project may appear to have a positive NPV due to inaccuracies in our estimates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What exactly does “the projected cash flow in Year 4 is $700,” mean?

A

Loosely speaking, we really mean that if we took all the possible cash flows that could occur in four years and averaged them, the result would be $700

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

GIGO

A

(garbage in, garbage out)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Forecasting risk aka estimation risk

A

The possibility that errors in projected cash flows lead to incorrect decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

It is a basic principle of economics that positive NPV investments are rare in a _____ competitive environment

A

highly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Base case

A

When investigating a new project. Naturally, we begin by estimating NPV based on our projected cash flows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Scenario Analysis

A

The determination of what happens to NPV estimates when we ask what-if questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Worst-case scenario

A

To calculate, we need to assign the least favourable value to each item

This means low values for items such as units sold and price per unit and high values for costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Similarly, the true worst case would involve some incredibly remote possibility of ___________

A

total disaster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The absolutely best thing that could happen would be something absurdly unlikely, such as launching

A

a new diet soda and subsequently learning that our (patented) formulation also just happens to cure the common cold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sensitivity Analysis

A

Investigation of what happens to NPV when only one variable is changed.

The basic idea with a sensitivity analysis is to freeze all the variables except one and see how sensitive our estimate of NPV is to changes in that one variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If our NPV estimate turns out to be very sensitive to relatively small changes in the projected value of some component of projected cash flow, the forecasting risk associated with that variable is ______

A

high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Graphically looking at sensitivity analysis

A

The steeper the resulting line is, the greater the sensitivity of the estimated NPV to the projected value of the variable being investigated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

For sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis,

A

Management experience and judgment must still come into play.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Simulation Analysis

aka Monte Carlo simulation

A

A combination of scenario and sensitivity analyses.

With scenario analysis, we let all the different variables change, but we let them take on only a small number of values.

With sensitivity analysis, we let only one variable change, but we let it take on a large number of values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Implicitly, we assumed that once a project is launched, its basic features cannot be changed.

A

For this reason, we say that our analysis is static (as opposed to dynamic).

17
Q

Managerial options or real options

A

Opportunities that managers can exploit if certain things happen in the future.

18
Q

Contingency Planning

A

Taking into account the managerial options that are implicit in a project.

There is no limit to the number of possible future scenarios or contingencies that we could investigate

19
Q

THE OPTION TO EXPAND

A

If we truly find a positive NPV project, there is an obvious consideration. Can we expand the project or repeat it to get an even larger NPV? Our static analysis implicitly assumes that the scale of the project is fixed.

20
Q

THE OPTION TO ABANDON

A

At the other extreme, the option to scale back or even abandon a project is also quite valuable

For example, if a project does not break even on a cash flow basis, it can’t even cover its own expenses. We would be better off if we just abandoned it. Our DCF analysis implicitly assumes that we would keep operating even in this case.

21
Q

THE OPTION TO WAIT

A

Implicitly, we have treated proposed investments as if they were go or no-go decisions. In reality, there is a third possibility: the project can be postponed, perhaps in hope of more favourable conditions

22
Q

THE TAX OPTION

A

Investment decisions may trigger favourable or unfavourable tax treatment of existing assets.

This can occur because capital cost allowance calculations are usually based on assets in a pooled class

23
Q

Strategic options

A

Options for future, related business products or strategies.

24
Q

How sensitive is OCF to a change in sales units

equation

A

Change in OCF / Change in quantity

25
Q

How sensitive is PV to a change in sales units

equation

A

Change in NPV / change in quantity