Chapter 1.1 - Conformity Flashcards
What is conformity?
A change in a person’s behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people
Describe Asch’s baseline procedure (1955)
- 123 American men were tested, each one in a group with apparent participants
- Two large white cards were presented
- One had the standard line (X) and the other had three comparison lines (A,B, and C)
- One of the comparison lines was clearly the same length as X and the other two were substantially different
- Participants had to say which of the comparison lines was the same length as the standard line out loud
Describe the physical arrangement of the participants in the baseline study
- Group size of 6 to 8
- Only one genuine participant, seated either last or second to last in the group
- The others were all confederates who gave the same incorrect, scripted answers each time
- The genuine participant did not know the others weren’t genuine participants
Describe the baseline findings
- Participants conformed with the confederates’ incorrect answers 36.8% of the time on average
- There were individual differences, 25% of participants never conformed
How did Asch investigate group size?
- Varied the number of confederates from 1 -15 (group size 2 - 16)
- Curvilinear relationship between group size and conformity rate
- Conformity increased with group size, but up to a certain point
- Three confederates = 31.8% conformity but the presence of more confederates made no difference, levelled off
- Suggests that most people are very sensitive to the views of others because 1-2 confederates was enough to sway an opinion
How did Asch investigate unanimity?
- Introduced a confederate who disagreed with the others
- They would give a correct answer in one variation and a different wrong one in the other
- The genuine participant conformed less often in the presence of a dissenter
- The influence of the majority depends on it being unanimous
How did Asch investigate task difficulty?
- Increased the difficulty of the line-judging task by making the standard line and the comparison lines more similar to each other in length
- It became harder for the genuine participants to see the differences between the lines
- Conformity increased due to the ambiguity of the answers in the harder task compared to the normal difficulty
What is a strength of Asch’s research? (research support)
- Lucas (2006) asked participants to solve easy and hard maths problems
- They were given answers from three other students
- Conformity increased when the problems were harder
- Asch is correct in claiming that task difficulty is one variable that affects conformity
What is a counterpoint to research support? (individual factors)
- Participants with high confidence in their maths abilities conformed less on hard tasks than those with low confidence
- Suggests individual factors can influence conformity by interacting with situational variables
- Asch did not research the roles of individual factors
What is a limitation of Asch’s research? (artificial situation and task)
- Participants knew they were in a research study and could’ve displayed demand characteristics
- Task was trivial
- The groups didn’t resemble groups we experience in everyday life
- Findings aren’t generalisable to real-world situations, especially those where the consequences of conformity might be important
What is a limitation of Asch’s research? (limited application)
- Participants were all American males
- Research suggests that women may be more conformist due to their concern about social relationships and being accepted
- The US is an individualist culture and similar conformity studies in collectivist cultures such as China found higher conformity rates
- Asch’s findings provide little information about conformity in women and people from other cultures
- Failed replications questions how transferable Asch’s findings are across time and cultures
What is another evaluation point? (ethical issues)
- Used deception on his participants
- They weren’t protected from psychological harm as many participants reported feeling stressed when they disagreed with the majority