Chapter 10: Relationships and Attraction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define communal relationships

A

individuals feel a special responsibility for one another and give and receive according to need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define exchange relationships

A

individuals feel little responsibility toward one another; giving and receiving are governed by concerns about equity and reciprocity. Typically short-term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define social exchange theory

A

people seek out relationships that have more rewards than costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define comparison level

A

people’s expectations about what they deserve/expect from a relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define comparison level for alternatives

A

people’s expectations about what they can get out of available other relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define equity theory

A

people are motivated to pursue fairness/equity in their relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define reward principle

A

we want rewards from our interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define attachment theory

A

our early attachments with parents and caregivers shape relationships for a person’s whole life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is The Strange Situation Study (Ainsworth 1978)?

A

Infants left in room with toys with their caregiver
Stranger enters room and caregiver leaves
Caregiver return after three minutes
Secure infants - comfortable with caregiver
Anxious infants - uncomfortable with both
Caregivers of anxious infants - rejected infant, randomly interrupted them, did not comfort infant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

define Anxiety dimension of attachment

A

amount of fear a person feels about rejection and abandonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define avoidance dimension of attachment

A

amount of discomfort regarding intimacy and dependence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the attachment styles and their definitions?

A

Secure - comfortable with relationships (low on both)
Avoidant - difficulty trusting people in relationships
Anxious-ambivalent - worries about scaring people away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the Longitudinal attachment study (Klohnen and Bera 1998)?

A

Forty-year long study on attachment styles and home-caregiver attitudes and behavior
Attachment styles stayed relatively similar decades later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the Attachment styles and outcomes study?

A

Over a 4-year period, secure participants were less likely to experience breakup (25.6%) than avoidant (52.2%) or anxious (43.6%) participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the Westgate West Study (Festinger et al., 1950)?

A

Researchers asked students who lived in student housing to list their closest friends
Only 5% of students lived in the same building
However, ⅔ of those listed as friends lived in the same building as the participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

define physical proximity

A

being closer (literally) to people leads to becoming closer (figuratively) with people

17
Q

define functional distance

A

how the layout encourages or inhibits contact between people

18
Q

define mere exposure effect

A

repeated exposure to a stimulus leads to a greater liking of a stimulus

19
Q

what is the Turkish Word Experiment (Zajonc 1968) ?

A

Participants shown turkis words kadirga, afworbu, and lokanta 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, or 25 times
Participants then indicated whether they thought the word meant something good or a bad
Words they saw more often were rated as more positive

20
Q

what is the albino rat study?

A

Rats exposed to either Mozart or Schoenberg
Rats placed in cage in which standing on one side turn on new Mozart music, standing on other side would turn on new Schoenberg
Rats who’d been raised Mozart, and the same was true for Schoenberg-raised rats

21
Q

define complementarity

A

the idea that opposites attract

-only true if similarities exist

22
Q

define status exchange hypothesis

A

romantic attraction increases when two individuals complement each other by offering both increased status in different domains

23
Q

define halo effect

A

the belief that attractive people have other positive qualities

24
Q

what is the telephone study?

A

Independent raters rated participants on attractiveness
Participants had 5 minute telephone conversations with other participants of opposite sex
More attractive participants rated as more likeable

25
Q

what is the phone study with photo?

A

Male participants had phone conversations with woman who they believed was attractive or unattractive
Male participants were warmer with attractive woman
Independent raters who only heard the woman’s portion of the conversation rated attractive woman as warmer and more sociable

26
Q

what was the shared self-concept study?

A

Married couple rated 90 trait adjectives on how accurately they described themselves and spouse
Then did a distracting track
Came back, rated on a computer how much they were “like me” or “not like me”
-romantic partners are faster to label traits like me when they are true of their parenter as well

27
Q

define investment model of commitment

A

three determinants make romantic partners more committed - relationship satisfaction, alternative partners, and investments

28
Q

what is the *Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse Study (Gottman & Levenson 1999) study?

A

Followed 79 married couples in longitudinal study

Identified four behaviors that predicted divorce:

29
Q

what four behaviors did the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse Study reveal?

A

Criticism: continuously finding fault with the other
Defensiveness: refusing to consider they’re at fault
Contempt: putting the other down
Stonewalling: disengaging from the interaction