Chapter 10 - Capital markets and pricing of risk Flashcards

1
Q

Define volatility

A

in finance, volatility is the standard deviation of returns.

Standard deviation, and therefore volatility, is easy to interpret as it is the same unit as the return itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What should we be cautious about volatility (std dev) and variance?

A

They do not make a distinciton between upside and downside. All they care about is changes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Formula for variance

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

if we hold stock beyond the first dividend, we need to…

A

Figure out what to do with the dividend. We can consider investing it all back into shares. This will affect future dividends like this:

Realized returns annual = (1+r_q1)(1+r_q2)(1+r_q3)(1+r_q4) IF DIVIDENDS PAYED QUERTAERYLY.

In general: what we do is compute the return per dividend period, and then compound these periods. If annual dividend payment, we end up with 5 compounding. If first period is 10%, second is 11%, third is 12%,…, we would get total return of 1.101.111.121.131.14 which would give us approx 76% return.

This require the stock price at each time period to be known.

This gives us the annual realized returns of the stock.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In general, how do we calculate realized returns?

A

Like we did earlier with dividend discount model, but we solve with variables as given, not forecasts.

Will include dividends and the capital gain.

So, the realized return = dividend yield + capital gain rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Over any particular period of time, we essentially observe one draw from the probability distribution of the returns. How can we get more data here?

A

if we assume that the distribution remains the same, we can observe multiple draws by observing the returns from multiple periods. We then count the number of times that a return fell within a certain interval, and use this to illustrate the probability distribution.

This is not perfect, but can help understand returns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the average annual return of a security?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Formula for variance based on historical sample?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

if we believe investors are neither too optimistic nor pessimistic, what can we say about their expected returns?

A

Their expected returns should be equal to the average annual return that is recorded on the previous years.

however, there is a difficulty with this assumption: The historical average return is just an estimate of the true expected return, and is therefore subject to estimation error,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

elaborate on estimation error

A

Given volatility of stock returns, which can be quite large, it can be very difficult to accuartely capture anything. As a result, the estimation error can be quite large, even with many years of historical data.

For instance, one stock can produce exact returns equal to the average, while another stock can produce very spread out returns, but with the same average as the other stock. They have the same average, but it is foolish to believe the two estimates are “equal”. The estimation error capture this, by taking a look at how volatile the estimation is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is estimation error computed?

A

we measure the estimation error of a statistical measure by something that we call standard error. The standard error is the standard deviation of the estimated value of the mean of the actual distribution around its true value. That is: the standard deviation of the average return.

Here is the mathematical process:

Suppose we have n independent and identically distributed random variables X_1, X_2, …, X_n that represent stock return for some stock at year “i”.

The random variables are drawn from the same popluaiton (we assume) with the same distributuion. Because of this, eahc of the observations (random variables) has a popluation mean and a popluation variance.

Our goal is to estimate the population mean. We do this by using estimator sample mean.

We have 2 goals. 1) Estimate the true mean/average of the annual stock returns, 2) Quantify the estimation error.
To estimate the populaiton/true mean, we use the estimator called “sample mean”. This estimator is “forventningsrett” (Norwegian), so we know it will tend towards the true mean.
This is fine, but we cannot be sure our estimate is perfect, as it will depend on the samples. Therefore, we quantify the spread of the estimates. Var(estimator sample mean) = (1/n^2)Var(∑Xi) = sigma^2 /n.
We then find standard deviation of this which is sigma/sqrt(n)
The measure in regards to estimating stock returns will measure the spread of our estimate. A low spread indicates that our estimate is likely to be quite accurate, while a larger spread indicates a more error-prone value. Note “estimate” in not plural. We only make one estimate of the mean, and by using math we can find the variance of this estimator, and thereby receiving a value that explain how good the estimate is.

Thus, sigma/sqrt(n) tells us something about the standard error.

REMEMBER: we do not have the sigma value. Therefore, we must use the sample variance, and sqrt it, to get the sample standard deviation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the general conclusion from estimation error part of the chapter?

A

The estimation error is too high to use past results to estimate expected returns. Even in the case of s and p, it was too difficult to do it. Many stocks have only fractions of that lifetime, and are subject to huge estimation errors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Name something useful we can use the standard error for+

A

Establish confidence intervals. The most simple one is the 95% confidence interval. This makes use of the fact that samples will be within 2 standard deviations approximately 95.44% of the time. We can use this to find the interval in which the stock return will be 95.44% of the time:

HistoricalAverageReturn +- 2 x StandardError

HistoricalAverageReturn +- 2 x (std(samples)/sqrt(n))

EX:

12.2% +- 2x(19.7% / sqrt(96)) = 12.2% +- 4%
= [8.2%, 16.2%]

This means: The stock return is inside of this range 95% of the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

This is the 95% confidence interval for S&P returns:

12.2% +- 2x(19.7% / sqrt(96)) = 12.2% +- 4%
= [8.2%, 16.2%]

what can we conclude from it?

A

Even with a 96 years of data, we cannot accurately predict the returns. It will vary.

What makes it even more difficult, is that the underlying probability distribution might also change with time, which cause old data to be irrelevant, and only new data to be good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define excess return

A

Excess return is the difference between the average return on an investment, and the average return of the US treasury bills.

excess return measures the average risk premium that investors earned for bearing the risk of the investment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Riskier investments must offer …

A

Riskier investments must offer investors higher average returns to compensate for the additional risk they have.

This is because investors are usually risk averse. The loss of X is greater than the profit of X.

We see a positive relaitonship between higher volatility and higher average returns.

NB: This applies for only large portfolios. It is not the case with individual stocks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Elaborate on the relationship between volatility and average returns for individual stocks

A

One would think that individual stocks with greater volatility would have greater average returns. But this is not the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Elaborate on types of risks

A

Common risk: Risk that is perfectly correlated

Independent risk: Risks that share no correlation.

Earthquakes and homes are common risks.
Theft and homes are independent risks.

In the case of theft, some home owners are unlucky, others are perhaps lucky. However, the overall number of unlucky home owners is quite predictable.

The averaging out of independent risks in a large portfolio is called diversification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what risks are diversified in large portfolios?

A

Independent risks are diversified in large portfolios, common risks are not

20
Q

if we take the standard deviation of the sample mean, what do we get?

A

We get the standard mean, assuming normally distributed variables that are independent and all that.

this has a formula, which we find through math manipulation of std and var and exp rules:

Standard Error = sigma/sqrt(n)

21
Q

what does the standard error actually tell us?

A

The standard error tells us the standard deviation of the estimator sample mean that estimate the true population mean.
Therefore, the standard error tells us that approx 68% of the time, the true population mean will lie inside of the range of mean +- standardError, etc ASSUMING NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED shites

22
Q

What can cause stock prices and dividends to be higher or lower than expected, and thus realized returns be different from what we expect?

A

News is a big one.

There are two types of news:
1) Firm specific
2) Market wide

KEY: The firm specific news are independent risks. The market wide news are common risks.

23
Q

What is systematic risk?

A

Undiversifiable risk

24
Q

What is idiosyncratic risk?

A

Diversifiable risk

25
Q

key point about systematic risk

A

The volatility of the picks does not change with the number of stocks in the portfolio.

This is NOT the case with idiosyncratic risks, which experience a dropoff in volatility as the number of stocks in the portfolio increase.

26
Q

Consider type I firms. Should investors expect to earn a risk premium for holding them?

A

The answer is NO.

Since type I firms only have idiosyncratic risk, we can eliminate it (at least most of it) by holding a large portfolio of them. Then we would on average (with great precision) be able to get a very expectable return with risk that approach zero as the number of stocks in the portfolio grows towards “large”.

Since this return is essentially risk-free, it should be considered an equivalent of risk-free investments, and should therefore be priced similarily. The law of one price makes sure that no arbitrage opportinuty exists, and the result is that there is no risk premium associated with holding large portfolios of type I firms.

NOTE: it is difficult if not impossible to completely remove common risks completely, but this serves as a theoretical perspective primarily.

27
Q

Diversification sounds decent, but what does it not do?

A

Diversificaiton does not avoid systematic risk.

This leads us to a key principle. Because investors are risk-averse, they demand a risk premium to cope with the systematic (market wide) risks. If not, they would invest in risk-free securities. Therefore, the risk premium of a security is determined by its systematic risk, and does not depend on diversifiable risk.

28
Q

The principle of systematic risk “the risk premium of a security is determined by its systematic risk, and does not depend on diversifiable risk” has a very important consequence. Elaborate on it

A

It follows that the volatility of a security is not useful to determine the risk premium that investors will earn. Volatility measure the individual diversifiable risk + systematic risk (total risk) and is therefore not accurate at displaying only the risk premium investors can expect to earn.

29
Q

How can we find the risk premium of type S compared to type I?

A

Say both firms have the same volatility.
The difference in expected average return is the risk premium.

30
Q

How can we measure the systematic risk of a stock?

A

We must somehow determine how much of its variability in its returns that are due to systematic risk vs diversifiable risks.

We need a portfolio that fluctuates ONLY as a result of systematic risk. This would be a perfectly diversified portfolio. Such a portfolio’s volatility represent systematic risks, as a perfectly diversified portfolio has eliminated the firm specific individual risks.

Although such a portfolio does not exist, we can approximate it by using indices like S&P 500, and assume that it is large enough to be quite close to perfectly diversified.

Next, we need a measure of what happens to the “perfectly diversified portfolio” when economy is “good” and when it is “bad”. Then we need to observe what happens to the individual stock as a result of changes in the perfectly diversified portfolio.
In a sense, if the S&P500 move 1% up, and stock “ABCD” changed 0.5% up (with no news of internal matters etc) we can say that the sensitivity of the stock “ABCD” towards systematic risk is 50%, because it moves 50% as much as the perfectly diversified portfolio does in the event of market-wide occurrings. This value is called the “beta” of the stock. Beta is the sensitivity of the individual stock towards the market risk.

So, the Beta tells us the systematic risk of the security.

31
Q

In general, what can we say about betas, in terms of interpreting stock betas?

A

betas tells us a lot about what the firm offer. For instance, cyclical industries (industires that tend to do well when economy is doing well etc) will usually have high betas. Utilities have low betas.

32
Q

Elaborate on estimating the risk premium

A

The goal is to find the risk premium for individual stocks.

we start by figuring out the market risk premium. We do that by using the perfectly diversified portfolio, and looking at the expected return. We take the expected return, and subtract the risk free interest rate.

The result is the risk premium for holding the perfectly diversified portfolio, which represent the risk premium that investors require to offset the systematic risk.

Then we use the beta to adjust for individual stocks. We do this by the formula:

cost of capital = risk free rate + beta x market risk premium

Cost of capital is also known as required return.

This result tells us what returns the investor require for the stock to offset the risk involved.

This is a measure of the systematic risk involved + the risk free rate.

beta x market risk premium gives us the systematic risk of the individual stock.

33
Q

can we have stocks with negative beta?

A

Yes, negative beta indicate that the stock will rise if market drops and vice versa.

risk averse investors may want to hedge with such an option, but would have to accept a cost of capital (required return) of less than the risk free interest rate.

34
Q

What is CAPM

A

Capital Asset Pricing Model.

it is a model for estimating the cost of capital.

35
Q

What is risk?

A

Risk is basically uncertainty. Therefore, risk involves both upside and downside. No risk is the same as knowing exactly how much cash flow some investment will generate, or knowing exactly what stock price returns we will have each year. Risk is greater than 0 in cases where we cannot with absolute certainty say what the returns will look like. Because of this, risk is a common topic in finance. Investors are typically risk-averse, and want some way to quantify the risk of their investments, so that they can know how “secure” their investments are in terms of producing known profits. Therefore, we want to quantify risk. In a way, risk is the possible fluctuations (and their likelihood) of stock prices.

36
Q

What does it mean when we say that an investment is risky

A

It means that there are different returns it may earn

37
Q

What is a theoretically good way to measure risk?

A

If we have access to the probability distribution of the returns, then we have a lot to work with.

We can use the probability distribution to establish the expected returns using the regular formula for expected value.

Note that expected return does not say anything about the risk, but more about what “average” over time.

it is typical to use statistics like standard deviation and variance to elaborate on the spread and variability in returns, which essentially is how “likely” it is that we can expect values/returns close to the mean or far out (in both positive and negative directions).

38
Q

What is the variance of a risk free investment?

A

A risk free investment will never deviate from the mean, and will therefore have a variance of 0.

39
Q

In finance, we refer to standard deviaiton as …

A

volatility

40
Q

in real life, we dont really have the probability distribution. how do we cope with this?

A

We extrapolate from past/historical data. This require the assumption that we have a stable environment where the past results are indicative of the future results

41
Q

If we have a stock that pays dividends multiple times a year, how do we find annual realized returns?

A
42
Q

What is market risk premium?

A

Market risk premium is the risk premium (additional interest) that investors require in order to hold the efficient portfolio, as compared to a risk-free option.

We find this market risk premium by taking the expected return from the market portfolio, and subtracting the risk-free interest rate.

For instance, if expected return is 11%, and risk-free rate is 5%, the risk premium is 6%.

43
Q

Given the beta of a stock, how can find the cost of capital required from holding a risky stock individually?

A

We need the risk free rate and then add the risk premium. Only question is: how do we find the risk premium?

We find the risk premium by considering the beta of the stock. The beta gives a multiplier of how the stock is affected from a percentage change in the systematic risk involved market portfolio. Therefore, the beta represent the systematic risk of the stock.

But, what do we multiply beta with? We must multiply beta by the risk premium investors require in regards to holding the market portfolio. Beta is related to market portfolio changes, so it must be multiplied by soemthing that measure risk premium associated with the market portfolio changes.

The formula then becomes:

CostOfCapital = riskFreeRate + beta(E[Rmkt] - riskFreeRate)

Recall that cost of capital is the same as expected return. Therefore, this is the expected return investors require to invest in a stock.

44
Q

the formula for cost of capital (expected return) of an individual stock does not include any element regarding firm-specific risk. It only includes beta, which is market-specific. why?

A

Any firm-specific risk can be diversified away by having a sufficiently large portfolio. Since one can do this, and receive returns close to zero risk, it basically means that investors will not require a risk premium that involves firm specific shite.

45
Q
A