Chapter 10 Flashcards

1
Q

Rationale

A

Reasons for adopting a resolution presented through observations, contentions, or advantages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Plan

A

Affirmative’s proposal for putting the resolution into effect. It should solve needs or gain new advantages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Status quo

A

Present system of laws, programs, policies etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Should

A

Means that the proposed case ought to be adopted, not that it will be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Should would argument

A

When the negative team argues that the affirmative plan won’t be passed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fiat

A

“Let it be done”

Affirmative can argue that whether or not their plan would be passed it should still be accepted in the debate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Burden of proof

A

The affirmative is obligated to show why the status quo is not working. They must use evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Prima Facie case

A

“On the face of things”

Affirmative has to provide evidence and reasons so judges and listeners will accept their position on face value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Issues

A

Important questions and considerations. They’re the basis for structuring affirmative cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stock issues

A

Fundamental requirements for a debate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Topicality

A

Must fall in the scope of the topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Framers intent

A

What did the authors of the resolution expect it to be about?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Extra topicality

A

Providing a solution to the problem that is outside the scope of the problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Plan spikes

A

Additions to the plan that explain things like funding or enforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Effects topicality

A

When the resolution requires substantial change but the plan provides minimal change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Harms

A

Show a problem with the status quo

Can be physical, monetary, or a social discrimination/deprivation of rights

17
Q

How can harms be presented?

A

Quantitative-measurable numeric form
Qualitative-improves quality of system
Future-needs to be solved in the future

18
Q

Inherency

A

Status quo won’t be enough to change the problem, coming from the structure or lack of a program.

19
Q

Attitudinal Inherency

A

Attitudes rather than structures cause problems

20
Q

How does a plan need uniqueness?

A

If the status quo can also gain the advantages of the plan, the case has no Inherency or uniqueness

21
Q

Solvency

A

Plan must be capable of solving the problem. It can’t create workability or practicality problems, including availability of funds

22
Q

What shouldn’t the affirmative plan do?

A

Create new disadvantages or have the advantages outweighed by them

23
Q

Paradigm

A

A model or way of viewing the world

24
Q

What was the original model of debate?

A

The legal model- the status quo was on trial

25
Q

Policy maker model of debate

A

The plan is emphasized

26
Q

Tabula rosa

A

Blank slate- senators argue the merits for their case as well as the paradigm from which their case should be judged

27
Q

Social science model

A

Senators and judges search for truth

28
Q

Educational paradigm

A

Judge evaluates based on argumentation

29
Q

Direct clash

A

The affirmative has the right to define and limit the problem area, while the negative must provide direct clash to the area selected.

30
Q

Negative presumption

A

The negative defends the present system until the status quo is adequately indicted. If negative can show the affirmative case is not prima Facie it makes a good argument

31
Q

Burden of rejoinder

A

The negative must present evidence and documentation to go against the affirmative case

32
Q

Negative bloc

A

Negative constructive and rebuttal are back to back and can be combined into one speech, giving the affirmative one speech to respond to twice the arguments

33
Q

Division of Labor

A

Both members need clearly defined notes for their speeches with evidence

34
Q

What is the affirmative divided into?

A

Rationale and plan