Chapter 1 - Social Influence Flashcards
Define conformity
Change in behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a group or person
Define internalisation
Taking on the majority view and accepting it as correct. Permanent even when the group is absent.
Identification
Moderate conformity, we act in the same way but don’t necessarily agree with them
Compliance
Temporary superficial conformity where we go along with the majority but privately disagree
Informational social influence
Taking on the majority view because we believe it is correct and accepting it because we want to be correct aswell
Normative social influence
Agreeing with the majority because we want to be accepted and liked, can lead to compliance
Give an example of internalisation
Becoming veggie because your friends are
Give and example of identification
Listening to the same music even if you don’t like it
Example of compliance
Peer pressure
Example of ISI
Agreeing in class with someone else’s answer
Example of NSI
Being Tory
What is the two process theory?
Suggest two main reasons people conform;
ISI
NSI
Who developed the two process theory of conformity?
Deutsch and Gerard (1955)
Research support for ISI
Lucas et al (2006), asked students to give answers to maths questions of various difficulty. Greater conformity on harder questions
What are nAffiliators?
People who have a greater need for affiliation - greater conformity
Research support for individual differences?
McGhee and Teevan (1967) found that students with higher need for affiliation were more likely to conform
Why is it not always possible for the two processes to be distinguished?
Outside labs they can act together and one is simply more dominant - the approach is not either or
Individual differences in ISI research support?
Perrin and Spencer (1980) conducted conformity study w science and engineering students and found very low conformity rates -they are confident in their intelligence
How does Asch’s variations support NSI
Asked p’s to write down answers and conformity dropped to 12.5%
How many participants were in Asch’s original study?
123 male American undergraduates
Asch’s original task?
Assess line length
Asch’s original procedure
Each naive participant tested with 6-8 confederates
All confederates instructed to give same wrong answers after first few trials
18 trails total w 12 answered incorrectly by confederates
Asch’s findings
75% confirmed at least once
P have wrong answer 37% of the time