Chapter 1 Flashcards
The human brain is a
squishy, wrinkled, walnut-shaped hunk of tissue
weighing about
1.3
kilograms.
Despite its disagreeable external appearance, the human
brain is an amazingly intricate network of neurons (cells that receive
and transmit electrochemical signals). Contemplate for a moment
the complexity of your own brain s
neural circuits. Consider the [how many]
billion neurons in complex array, the estimated [how many] trillion connections among
them, and the almost infinite number of
paths that neural signals can follow
through this morass.
100
billion neurons
estimated 100 trillion connections
neuroscience
(the scientific
study of the nervous system)
Jimmie G. was tested by eminent neurologist Oliver
Sacks, and a few simple questions revealed a curious
fact:
The 49-year-old patient believed that he was 19.
Thinking Creatively about Biopsychology, Clinical Implications
The Evolutionary Perspective, Neuroplasticity
The study of the biology of behavior has a long history, but biopsychology did not develop into a major
neuroscientific discipline until the
20th century.
Although it is not possible to specify the exact date of
biopsychology s birth, the publication of
The Organization of Behavior in 1949 by D. O. Hebb played a key role
in its emergence
Biopsychologists are neuroscientists who bring to their
research a knowledge of
behavior and of the methods of
behavioral research.
Neuroanatomy
The study of the structure of the
nervous system
Neurochemistry
The study of the chemical bases of
neural activity
Neuroendocrinology
The study of interactions between the nervous system and the endocrine system
Neuropathology
The study of nervous system disorders
Neuropharmacology
The study of the effects of drugs
on neural activity
Neurophysiology
The study of the functions and activities of the nervous system
Both human and nonhuman animals are the subject of
biopsychological research. Of the nonhumans, ! are
the most common subjects; however, !, !, !, and
! are also widely studied.
rats, mice, cats, dogs, and
nonhuman primates
Humans have several advantages over other animals as
experimental subjects of biopsychological research: They
can
follow instructions, they can report their subjective
experiences
In other words, the differences
between the brains of humans and those of related
species are more
quantitative than qualitative and thus
many of the principles of human brain function can be
clarified by the study of nonhumans
Conversely, nonhuman animals have three advantages
over humans as subjects in biopsychological research. The
first is that
the brains and behavior of nonhuman subjects
are simpler than those of human subjects. Hence, the
study of nonhuman species is more likely to reveal fundamental brain behavior interactions.
The second advantage is that insights frequently arise from the comparative
approach,
the study of biological processes by comparing
different species. For example, comparing the behavior of
species that do not have a cerebral cortex with the behavior of species that do can provide valuable clues about
cortical function.
The third advantage is that it is possible
to conduct research on laboratory animals that, for ethical reasons, is not possible with human subjects.
This is
not to say that the study of nonhuman animals is not governed by a strict code of ethics
Experiments
The experiment is the method used by
scientists to study causation, that is, to find out what
causes what.
Usually, a different group of subjects is tested under each condition (between-subjects
design),
but sometimes it is possible to test the same
group of subjects under each condition (within-subjects
design).
This difference between the conditions is called the
independent variable. The variable that is measured by
the experimenter to assess the effect of the independent
variable is called the
dependent variable. If the experiment is done correctly, any differences in the dependent
variable between the conditions must have been caused
by the independent variable.
Why is it critical that there be no differences between
conditions other than the independent variable? The reason is that when there is more than one difference that
could affect the dependent variable, it is difficult to determine whether it was the independent variable or the unintended difference called a
confounded variable that
led to the observed effects on the dependent variable. Although the experimental method is conceptually simple,
eliminating all confounded variables can be quite difficult. Readers of research papers must be constantly on the
alert for confounded variables that have gone unnoticed
by the experimenters themselves.
An experiment by Lester and Gorzalka (1988) illustrates the experimental method in action. The experiment
was a demonstration of the Coolidge effect. The Coolidge
effect is
the fact that a copulating male who becomes incapable of continuing to copulate with one sex partner can
often recommence copulating with a new sex partner (see
Figure 1.2). Before your imagination starts running wild, I
should mention that the subjects in Lester and Gorzalka s
experiment were hamsters, not students from the undergraduate subject pool.
Lester and Gorzalka argued that the Coolidge effect
had not been demonstrated in females because it is more
difficult to conduct well-controlled Coolidge-effect experiments with females not because females do not display a Coolidge effect. The confusion, according to Lester
and Gorzalka, stemmed from the fact that the males of
most mammalian species become sexually fatigued more
readily than do the females. As a result, attempts to
demonstrate the Coolidge effect in females are often confounded by the fatigue of the males. When, in the midst
of copulation, a female is provided with a new sex partner, the increase in her sexual receptivity could be either a
legitimate Coolidge effect or a reaction to the greater
vigor of the new male. Because female mammals usually
display little sexual fatigue, this confounded variable is
not a serious problem in demonstrations of the Coolidge
effect in males.
The dependent variable was the amount of
time that the female displayed lordosis (the arched-back,
rump-up, tail-diverted posture of female rodent sexual receptivity) during each sex test.
As Figure 1.3 illustrates, the
females responded more vigorously to the unfamiliar
males than they did to the familiar males during the third
test, despite the fact that both the unfamiliar and familiar
males were equally fatigued and both mounted the females
with equal vigor.