Chapter 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Epiricism

A
  • knowledge that comes from (is observed through) the 5 senses making it verifiable by other people
  • clear evidence, not subjective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Theories

A
  • set of statements that describes general principles about how variables relate to one another
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

5 things that make a good theory

Good theories are tentative

A
  • willing to modify or adapt a theory when it is challenged (instead of dismissing the contrary data/findings)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

5 things that make a good theory

Good theories are falsifiable

A
  • can at least be proven wrong
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

5 things that make a good theory

Good theories are rigorosly evaluated

A
  • tested over and over again
  • repeated evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

5 things that make a good theory

Good theories are parsimonious

A
  • explain evidence w/the fewest possible assumptions
  • based on logic + evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Do studies prove theories?

A
  • no
  • cannot confirm 100% fact, can only find evidence that supports it
  • can’t test everyone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Data

A
  • a set of observations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hypothesis

A
  • statement that clearly + specifically indicates the nature of the expected relationship between variables under study
  • is consistent w/but goes beyond previous research
  • offers a prediction about what will happen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ideally, hypotheses are preregistered. What does that mean?

A
  • designed before collecting data
  • researcher states publicly what the study’s outcome is expected to be
  • not convincing if data is collected first (sketchy)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Replication

A
  • the study is conducted again to test whether the result is consistent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Applied research

A
  • conduct their research in a local, real-world context
  • done with a practical problem (ex. is this setup working in a classroom)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Basic research

A
  • goal is to enhance a general body of knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Translational research

A
  • use of lessons from basic research to develop and test applications to health care, psychotherapy, or other forms of treatment and intervention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 5 steps of the theory cycle?

A

1) theory
2) research question
3) research design (hypothesis)
5) preregistration
6) data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Merton’s scientific norms

Universalism

A
  • scientific claims are evaluated according to their merit, independent of the researcher’s creds or reputation
16
Q

Merton’s scientific norms

Communality

A
  • scientific knowledge is created by a community, and it’s findings belong to the community
17
Q

Merton’s scientific norms

Disinterestedness

A
  • scientists strive to discover the truth, whatever it is
  • not swayed by antything
18
Q

Merton’s scientific norms

Organized skepticism

A
  • scientists question everything, including their own theories
19
Q

Comparison Groups

A
  • helps us compare what would happen both with and without the thing we’re interested in
20
Q

Why is experience not a reliable source of information?

A
  • we tend to jump to causal conclusions
21
Q

What are 3 issues with using experience as a source of information?

A

1) experience has no comparison groups
2) experience is confounded - it is something that confuses us and makes it difficult for us to explain what we see because there can be more 1 way to interpret it
3) experience is probabilistic - no comparison groups, may misunderstand things, isn’t based on probabilities like research is

22
Q

Confounds

A
  • alternative explanations for an outcome
  • found data “confuses” us
  • think one thing caused another but it wasn’t the only cause
23
Q

What does: research results are probabilistic: mean?

A
  • findings do not explain all cases of the time (not 100% correct)
  • research conclusions are based on observed patterns that can’t be seen without comparison groups