Changing patterns of marriage- paper 2 Flashcards
Life course
Allan and crow
The pattern of family changes that someone goes through during there life time.
Up to the 1960’s (marriage, living together, having sex, having children- institution of marriage and the family bond things together.)
Children would be born to 2 natural parents, finish education, leave home, get married, start own family.
parents would be left to enjoy more leisure time, work, become grandparents.
Levis said life course was compulsory socially determinant norms.
Reasons for changes in families
-people are having fewer children
-More people living as singletons or couples with out children
-Divorce rates are higher
-More people go to uni
-People are living longer
Reasons are families are the same as our parents
-ethnicity/ culture values change slowly
-Social class- people change class values very slowly
-Gender norms- some greater gender norms may remain the same for your generation as for your parents.
marriage-
first marriage-
remarriage-
Traditionally the formal union of a man and woman recognised by the law by witch they have become husband and wife.
A marriage in witch neither partner has been married before
One or both individuals have been married before
Marriage is declining in uk
from 2020 marries have decreased by 16% lowest recorded number in 2019 since 1838
-Avarge age from opposite sex marriages men- 35 women- 33
-same sex men-38 women-34 increase same sex marriages from 1970
-Decrease of religious ceromans in 2019-18.7% 2020-15%
Reason for change in marriage patterns
-changing attitudes towards marriage
-secularisation
-declined stigma attached to alternative marriage
-change position on women
-fear of divorce
cohabitation
involves an unmarried couple in a sexual relationship that live together. Number of marriage decrease cohabitation increases. (2.9 million opposite sex 69000 same sex). A firth of those who are cohabiting have done previously before. More younger couple cohabitation
Way cohabitation are seen
-a temporary informal arrangement. Spend a lot of time together and accommodation. Fairly temporary and casual.
-As an alternative or substitute. long term stable committed partners. without legal commitments or patriarchal dimensions or feminist identities associated with marriage.
-as a preparation or trial for marriage. 80% of first time marriages have been predetermined by a period of cohabitation.
reasons for increase in cohabitation
-The cahnge roll in women. women are ore inderpndant. can finantally support themselfes. Spen more tim egetting a career often do betteer in education than men. Less likely to accept moth/ house wife role. Spend more time cohabiting with a partner to avoid disagreement with marriage breakdown then result in legal costodies.
-reduced function of the family the family and social institution share these functions. Couples are a less practical necessity
-Change in attitudes and a reduced social stigma. Younger couple do not see the important of tradition due to secularisation.
-There is a rising number of couples getting divorce
-Beck said there is more freedom to chock that also leads to ricks marriage is not a risk worth taking
New right views on cohabitation
C-habitation is less stable than marriage. Couple are less happy, more unfaithful, more abusive, stresses, depressed.
-David Cameron a Conservative said by supporting marriage the government puts family at the heart of there policies.
-Marriage is important only by having strong families can the big society flourish with individuals individual helping society.
-Family is immensely important as children brought up in strong families learn hot to behave and hive and take. They learn responsibilities how how to live humorously with others. Strong families after at the foundation of a strong society
-bad relationships lead to children growing up in poverty, fail in school, unemployed
Opposed view labour, personal life perspective
-ED Millibars say marriage inst for everyone
-stable familes are more important than the institution of marriage
-Government has let down families and young people that make polices that betray the next generation. Who marry later or are less likely to make this legal commitment.
-Pro-commitment married families are more stables than other types. stable families come in different forms
-Marriage should be a choice not a political pressure
Rising divorce rates
Increased number of marriages ending in divorce. The number of divorces has doubled from 1960s to 1970s. Britain has the highest divorce rates. 40% of marriages end in divorce. With the present rates 1 in 4 children will have divorced parents by 16
What are the reasons for rising numbers of divorce
- more access due to the divorce reform act
-securalisation
-getting married younger - high expectations for marriage when not met people are unhappy and unwilling to stay
-If one of both partners have been married before
3 types of divorce statistics
- total number of divorce petitions per year- people applying fir divorce not nesserally getting divorced.
-total number of decrees absolute granted per year- the number of divorces actually garnered
-divorce rates- the number of divorces each year per thousand married people in the population
What don’t divorce statistics show
Who would / wouldn’t use divorce statistics
- the number of people who are separated by not divorced
- the number of people who live in ‘empty shell’ marriages couples who want to divorce but can’t because of parental roles
- how many unhappy unstable marriages there were before divorce was made more accessible
+ conservative- new rights- functionalists
X interactionism