changing family patterns Flashcards
reason for the decline in marriage: secularisation
-decline in religious influence has reduced the pressure to marry
reason for the decline in marriage: individualism
people increasingly prioritise personal fulfilment and autonomy
reason for the decline in marriage: economic changes
- marriages is often delayed due to financial pressures or career ambitions
reason for the decline in marriage: rise in cohabitation
-cohabitation has become socially acceptable with many couples viewing it as a trial.
-cohabiting couples live together for longer periods before marrying
reason for the increase in divorce:
- risen significantly since the divorce reform act- made divorce easier to obtain
reason for the increase in divorce:
-legal changes made divorce easier
-increased expectations of marriage based on emotional satisfaction rather than social obligation
-feminism- greater financial independence for women made it easier to leave unsatisfactory marriages
consequences on increase in divorce
-contributed to an increase in lone parent families, blended families and a trend towards serial monogamy
childbearing: decline in child birth rates reasons:
-changing attitudes of women: women now focus on their education/ career and so have children later in life
-contraception
-financial consideration: high cost of raising children leads to delay in children
evaluation of decline in child birth rates
-reflects shifts in gender roles and economic pressure
-but also raise concerns about an ageing population and few people available to support future generations
Chester(1985)
-proposed the concept of Neo -conventional -suggesting that while families became more diverse, nuclear family still remain dominant
-Neo-conventional family : dual earner families in which both parents go to work
evaluation of Chester
-acknowledges changes in family forms
-but maintains the traditional family structures as important for social stability- ignores the significance of family diversity
Stacey( 1998)
Postmodernists Stacey: argues that family now forms based on personal choice rather than societal expectations
evaluation of Stacey
-challenges the dominance of nuclear family highlighting the significance of personal choice and gender equality
-however critcs argue that she overlooks the persistence of trad family norms in many parts of society
Weeks (2000)
focuses on the growing significance of individualism and personal choice in the family lie particularly in the context of same-sex relationships
-chosen families: weeks argues that LGBTQ+ individuals often create “families of choice “ where emotional and supportive relationship, rather than blood ties, form the foundation of family life
-reflects broader societal acceptance of diverse family forms
evaluation of weeks
-highlights the move away from traditional heterosexual family structrue
critiqued for overlooking challenged LGBTQ+ individuals still face e.g legal or social discrimination