Ch28: Accepting Risk Flashcards
Risk profile
- Complete set of risk
exposures - Current / emerging
Risk limits
- Defined by company -
set of acceptable risks
to be adhered to - Maximum risk
Risk capacity
- βMaximumβ volume of risk that
an organisation can take - According to some risk
measures, e.g., economic
capital
Risk appetite may be related to:
- Existing exposure to the risk
- Culture of individual / company
- Size
- Period of time for which company has
operated - Level of capital available
- Existence of parent cpy
- Level of regulatory control to which it is
exposed - Institutional structure
- Previous experience of board members
Risk appetite statement:
Set / approved at board level
* Need not be complex
* Short, clear set of statements relating to risk
measures / objectives
- Solvency level
- Credit rating
- Earnings and ability to pay dividends
- Economic value
* Subjective / quantitatively
* Deterministic statement / probabilistic statements
* Could use a combination of metrics
* Different metrics for different stakeholders -
shareholders vs policyholders / regulator
Risk tolerance and risk limits:
Translate the risk appetite statement into more
detailed risk tolerance and limits
* Typically done enterprise-wide
* Holistic approach
- Take advantage of synergies
- Avoid undesired risk concentration
* Similar to risk appetite - risk tolerance statements
can be
- Both quantitative and qualitative / subjective
- Often stated as a set of acceptable limits for
different risk categories, considering links between
categories
* Typically, probabilistic statements - difficult to keep
track of, measure and not always easy to use in
practice
Risk metrics:
Indicator that aims to express the degree
of risk
- % equity in portfolio
- Exposure to a risk
- Level of duration mismatch between
assets and liabilities
* Measure whether company is operating
within its risk tolerance limits
* Used in order to get quick and early
indication of changes in risk profile that
may lead to breach of risk tolerance
* Quantitative / qualitative indicators of level
of risk in a specific part of the organisation
Capital requirements:
Companies need capital buffers to cope with impact of risk events
* Prescribed by regulators - Solvency II / SAM
* Avoid inappropriate risk appetite - minimum levels of solvency capital
Markets for risk:
Exits if price < perceived cost of risk
* Different stakeholders have different appetites
for risk - risk transferred between entities for
monetary payment
* Where there is good market for risk transfer,
system is said to be efficient
Insurance companies / banks:
Larger
* By pooling the risks - stable returns and make
profit from premiums
* Multiple sources of funding
* Volumes of diverse client base in order to
spread out its risks
* Better systems and techniques to measure the
risks
Financial products as risk transfer mechanism
- All risks should be identified during the product
design process - Consider mitigation techniques - possibly hedge
risks across different product types - Components considered in a pricing assessment of
a product: - cost of funding incurred in order to raise the
funds to lend - risk premium for prob of default & loss
- margin for costs & required profitability
- Cost of risk depends on features of financial
product and other business of provider - Appropriate cost - risks should be classified into
subgroups, each of which represents a
homogeneous body of risk with a particular set of
rating factors - Additional options
- May make product more attractive
- May introduce new risks and additional costs
- Risk that product design will not meet
beneficiariesβ needs and desires - Can be mitigated by small scale product trials,
market research and focus groups
Greater risk classification in general insurance: - Highly competitive and largely sold on price
- Protect against adverse selection from
policyholder - Greater volume of data to work with - more
possible and meaningful - Policyholders likely to be more willing to provide
data required
Risk classification
Classify risks into homogeneous and credible
risk sub-groups
* Enables cpy to charge premium rates that
fairly reflect relative risk of each sub-group
* Will reduce likelihood of anti-selection
* Use rating factors to divide risks into
homogenous sub-groups
Rating factors used by general insurer to
classify risk under personal motor insurance
policy
Gender & age of driver
* Occupation of driver
* Postcode of area where vehicle is kept
* Type of vehicle
* Size of engine
* Age of vehicle
* Number & type of previous accidents/ claims
* Use of the vehicle
* Existence of driving conviction
* Anticipated annual mileage
Reasons for typically greater risk classification
in general insurance than life insurance
GI highly competitive and largely sold on
price β market pressures
* GI have greater volume of data to work with
making risk classification more possible and
meaningful
* Policyholders will be more willing to provide
data required by GI than LI
Insurable risks criteria:
- Policyholder must have an interest in the risk being
insured to distinguish between insurance & a wager - Risk is of financial and reasonably quantifiable nature
- Claim amounts payable must bear some relationship to
the financial loss incurred