Ch 30: Risk Transfer Flashcards

1
Q

When faced with a risk, each stakeholder can decide whether to:

A
  • Avoid the risk altogether
  • Reduce the risk (probability, severity, both)
  • Reject the need for financial coverage - risk trivial / largely
    diversified
  • Retain in full
  • Transfer in full - payment of a premium
  • Partly retain and partly transfer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The extent of risk transfer will
depend on the:

A
  • Probability of the risk occurring
  • Risk appetite
  • Existing resources to finance
    the risk event if it happens
  • Cost of transferring the risk
  • Willingness of a third party to
    accept the risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The choice of mitigation approach will depend on:

A
  • Impact on frequency and severity of the risk
  • Feasibility & cost of implementing the option
  • Cost and impact on profit
  • Secondary risks arising and how they might be dealt with
    Overall impact on distribution of NPVs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The extent of risk transfer will
depend on the:

A
  • Probability of the risk occurring
  • Risk appetite
  • Existing resources to finance
    the risk event if it happens
  • Cost of transferring the risk
  • Willingness of a third party to
    accept the risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cost

A
  • Cost of transferring risk & profit
  • If risks are transferred, the cedant (party
    transferring the risk) removes potential
    downside and upside exposure - If upside
    exposure preserved - increased costs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Counterparty risk

A
  • Investment bank / reinsurer
  • Failure / default returns risk to cedant
  • May be regulatory restrictions that reduce the
    effectiveness of risk transfer
  • Maximum permissible amount that can be
    transferred
  • Capped reduction in regulatory capital reduces
    attractiveness of option
  • Effectiveness constrained by capacity / risk appetite
    of market
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reinsurance - benefits & costs

A
  • Benefits of reinsurance have to be weighed up
    against the cost
  • Reinsurance premium - loadings for expenses,
    contingencies, and profits
  • Reinsurer may be able to offer very
    competitive terms for administration, actuarial
    services, and other insurance advice if
    contract is purchased
  • Technical assistance - reduces business and
    operational risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Areas in which insurance company might
seek assistance from reinsurer:

A
  • Product design
  • Pricing
  • Guidance in setting underwriting
    policies and claims controls
  • Wording of policy documents
  • Establishment of suitable
    administration systems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Benefits of reinsurance:

A
  • Reduction in claims volatility and hence
  • Smoother profits
  • Reduced capital requirements
  • Increased capacity to write more business and achieve diversification
  • Limitation of large losses arising from
  • Single claim on a single risk
  • Single event
  • Cumulative events
  • Geographical and portfolio concentrations of risk and hence
  • Reduced risk of insolvency
  • Increased capacity of writing larger risks
  • Access to expertise and data of the reinsurer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cost of reinsurance:

A
  • Reinsurance premiums
  • Cost in management
  • Providing policy and claims details to
    reinsurer
  • Managing recoveries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cost vs benefit:

A
  • Calculate realistic estimate of net cost of
    reinsurance (premium - expected benefits)
  • Together with a range over which this net
    cost may vary depending on experience
  • Consider liquidity risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Basic product types

A
  • Main types - proportional and non-
    proportional
  • May be arranged on
  • Case-by-case, non-obligatory basis
    (facultative)
  • Obligatory basis using a treaty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Reinsurance terminology

A
  • Cede: β€˜pass on’ or β€˜give away’
  • Treaty: covers a group of policies, reinsurer is
    obliged to accept these risks from insurer, subject
    to conditions
  • Direct writer: insurer with direct contract with
    policyholders – primary insurer /cedant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Proportional reinsurance

A

Reinsurer covers an agreed proportion
of each risk - proportion may
* Be constant for all risks covered -
quota share
* Vary by risk covered - surplus
Have to be administered automatically -
require treaty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Advantages of quota share reinsurance:

A
  • Simple to administer - written by treaty
    and constant proportion
  • Helps diversify risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Quota share reinsurance

A
  • Fixed percentage of each and every risk is
    reinsured
  • Widely used by ceding providers to
  • Spread risk
  • Write larger portfolios of risk
  • Encourage reciprocal business
17
Q

Disadvantages of quota share reinsurance:

A
  • Same proportion ceded for large and small
    risks
  • Same proportion ceded for low and high
    variance risks
  • Does not cap the cost of very large claims
18
Q

Surplus reinsurance

A
  • Treaty specifies retention level and maximum level of cover available from reinsurer
  • Proportion of risk ceded is then used in the same way as quota share
  • Retention level / estimated maximum loss
  • Retention level may be fixed for all risks / variable at the discretion of the cedant
19
Q

Advantages

A
  • Enables ceding provider to write larger risks which
    might otherwise be beyond writing capacity
  • Helps ceding provider spread risk
  • Flexible - can fine-tune experience for class
    concerned
20
Q

Disadvantage

A
  • More complex administration - assess
    and record risks separately
  • Does not cap cost of very large claims
21
Q

Non-Proportional reinsurance

A
  • Reinsurer agrees to indemnify ceding company
    for the amount of any loss above a stated
    excess point
  • Cover is up to a stated upper limit
  • Insurer purchases further layers of XL
    cover, which stack on top of the primary layer,
    from different reinsurers
22
Q

Uses of non-proportional reinsurance:

A
  • To permit a ceding provider to accept risks
    that could lead to large claims - caps losses
  • To stabilise the results of the ceding
    provider by reducing claims fluctuations
  • Profits and dividends less volatile
  • More efficient use of capital, since lower
    free assets required
  • To reduce the risk of insolvency from large
    losses
23
Q

Different forms:reinsurance

A
  • Risk XL
  • Relates to individual losses
  • Affects only one insured risk at any time
  • Aggregate XL
  • Covers the aggregate of losses, above an excess
    point and subject to an upper limit, sustained from a
    defined peril(s) over a defined period - usually 1 year
  • By event, peril / class of business
  • Stop loss
  • Form of aggregate XL
  • Provides cover based on total claims, from all
    perils on a ceding company’s whole account / major
    class of business
  • Catastrophe XL
  • Pays out if a catastrophe, as defined in the
    reinsurance contract, occurs
  • Providing coverage for very high aggregate losses
    arising from a single event
  • Aim is to reduce potential loss due to non-
    independence of risks insured
  • Usually only available on a yearly basis and has to
    be renegotiated each year
24
Q

Advantages of XL reinsurance

A
  • Caps losses – allows cedant to take on
    risks that could produce very large claims
  • Protects cedant against individual
    aggregate large claims
  • Helps stabilize profits from year to year
  • Help make more efficient use of capital by
    reducing variance of claim payments
25
Q

Disadvantages:XL reinsurance

A
  • Premium payable - can be greater than
    expected recoveries
  • Premiums may be greater than pure risk
    premium for the cover
26
Q

Alternative risk transfer

A
  • Non-traditional methods by which organisations can
    transfer risks to third parties
  • Involves tailor-made solutions for risks that the
    conventional reinsurance market would regard as
    uninsurable / does not have the capacity to absorb
  • Uses both banking and insurance techniques
27
Q

ART contracts:

A
  • Integrated risk covers
  • Securitisation (e.g., catastrophe bonds)
  • Post loss funding
  • Insurance derivatives
  • Swaps
28
Q

Integrated risk covers:

A
  • Typically arranged between insurers and
    reinsurers
  • Covers several lines / classes of general insurance
    business over several years
  • Commonly include cover of financial risks - market
    and credit
  • Excess point and upper limit in relation to
    aggregated risks
  • Multi-year, multi-line covers – will give premium
    savings due to cost savings
  • Substitute for debt and equity
    Uses of integrated risk covers:
  • Avoid buying excessive cover
  • Smooth results
  • Lock into attractive terms
    Premium savings due to:
  • Cost savings - not several arrangements and not
    renegotiated each year
  • Greater stability of results due to diversification by
  • Type of risk insured
  • Time
29
Q

Disadvantages:Integrated risk covers:

A
  • Credit risk in relation to the cover provider
  • Lack of availability
  • Expenses arising from tailor-made aspect - need full
    insight into dealings
  • Difficulty in structuring the provider’s risk
    management programme in a holistic, multi-line way
  • separate risk managers for separate risk types
30
Q

Securitisation:

A
  • Transfer of insurance risk to banking and
    capital markets - risk β†’ financial security
  • Used for managing catastrophe risks
  • Special purpose vehicle (SPV) is separate
    legal entity between investor and insurer
  • High-risk investment - probability that
    return will be 0
  • Insurance catastrophe risk is
    uncorrelated with market risk - benefit to
    investors
31
Q

Post loss funding:

A
  • Guarantees that, in exchange for a
    commitment fee, funding will be provided
    on the occurrence of a specific loss
  • Funding often loan on pre-arranged terms
    or equity
  • Way of raising capital to cover losses from
    a risk after the risk event has happened
  • Securing terms in advance under which
    capital can be raised following
    catastrophe
  • Lower commitment fee β†’ cheaper
32
Q

Insurance derivatives:

A
  • Catastrophe / weather options
  • Majority of market is OTC although
    exchange-traded contracts exist
33
Q

Swaps:

A
  • Organisations with matching, but negatively correlated / uncorrelated risks can swap packages of risk
    so that each organisation has a greater risk diversification
  • Reinsurance swap, longevity swap, weather swap
  • Unit of trading required - sum assured / amount of revenue or profits
34
Q

Reasons why providers take out ART contracts:

A
  • Provision of cover that might otherwise be unavailable
  • Stabilisation of results
  • Cheaper cover
  • Tax advantages
  • Greater security of payment
  • Management of solvency margins
  • More effective provision of risk management
  • As a source of capital