Ch. 9: Beliefs and Values Flashcards
Why study cognition in relationships
study of cognition started after people started studying behavior
behavioral research assumes that behaviors have inherent meanings (saying “shut up” has 1 meaning only - it is an aggressive behavior)
but…
in fact behaviors are ambiguous : the annie hall example
meaning in relationships comes partly from the behaviors, and partly from how we interpret it (oh you bought me flowers - you love me OR what did you do - same behavior, lots of ambiguity)
relationship therapists/scientists care about the fact that couples say “i LOVE this relationship” and then somewhere down the road they hate the relationship
it’s not all in our heads but there is a lot of room for interpretation, flexibility, and ambiguity
Revisiting the Intimacy Process Model
-feeling understood validated and cared for is not only a response to not only what I do or you do, but to the dance of our behaviors
the intimacy process model EXPLICITLY says that there’s a process in which each partner is interpreting behavior and there is ambiguity in how you interpret these behaviors
- the nature of your response is dependent on the nature of your interpretation
- your interpretation is determined by motives, needs goals, fear, beliefs and values
- my response to your behavior depends on what your behavior MEANS to me (how does that strike you)
- if your dependency is threatening to me then I might say “clingy, needy, demanding! what about my life? you didn’t ask me what I was doing tonight” (that was really insensitive to you) but I could also look at your dependency as an opening for closeness
A’s reaction to B’s rejection could also go 2 ways - B’s response could be validated by A “you’re right, I wasn’t thinking about your needs/day. Go to the gym and relax, I’m sorry” OR A could feel rejected and say “I asked you for something and you said no, I feel extremely unloved and cared for because of your behavior”
what’s going on in this behavior is partly a function of what is being said and partly a function of all sorts of stuff that is only going on in your head
In studies, the couples have different interpretations (interpretive filters) about what’s going on than the objective observers (big differences)
what’s going on in their heads and how is it affecting their experience and what’s going on in their relationship? A LOT
What do we know about our intimate relationships?
Three levels of relationship knowledge (for lay people) - Fletcher, 2002:
- General beliefs and values re: social behavior
- General beliefs and values re: relationships
- Specific beliefs and values re: one particular intimate relationship
in our heads we are bouncing info off of these beliefs and values
- if your specific beliefs about YOUR relationship don’t match you general beliefs about relationships, that’s going to be a problem
General beliefs and values re: social behavior
most general abstract belief and/or value about social behavior
belief about the world and how to behave in it
-people are inherently good
-men are fundamentally different from women
-“Look out for #1” - the world is dangerous so you should look out for yourself
General beliefs and values re: relationships
you don’t have to be a relationship scientist to have a belief about intimate relationships
general beliefs about intimate relationships as a whole
“love conquers all”
“relationships fade”
“to be in a good relationship, you have to work hard at it”
“men didn’t evolve to have a monogamous relationship”
Specific beliefs and values re: one particular intimate relationship
What do you believe about the person you are with right now - YOUR RELATIONSHIP
“she is my soulmate” - we are 2 halves of a whole and we are meant to be together
“this is not mr right but this is mr right now” - in this current relationship my heart isn’t safe - this would have a different reaction to behavior than if you thought he was mr right
What functions does this knowledge (beliefs and values) serve?
theories help us to navigate our complex social worlds in three ways:
-understand and explain the world around us
-anticipate and predict what will happen
-control and regulate our behavior
The connection btwn these last two levels proves to be particularly important - how do people’s reactions depend on the body of knowledge that they carry around about relationships
how does my reaction depend on what I anticipate and predict will happen? - it depends a lot
understand and explain the world around us
especially in relationships - forming a relationship
- you’re on a date and there’s no mystery about what’s going on
- because we have a theory about what a date is like we don’t have to say “I wonder if this person really just wants to see this movie or if they want to get close to me”
anticipate and predict what will happen
dropping off at the end of the date “would you like to come upstairs”
- if I say yes we could make out or more and if I say no it might send a message that may make it more difficult for them to invite me out again
control and regulate our behavior
if, at the door the person leans in and kisses me
- what’s going to happen?
- how I react depends on my beliefs and values
The Ideal Standards Model
How do we know if we are in a good or bad relationship? - draws on our cognitions (beliefs and values) to answer this question
We compare what we perceive we have in the relationship with pre-existing beliefs and values
According to this theory, the amount of discrepancy between values for relationships in general and perceptions of the current relationship in particular determines whether an individual will be satisfied
-The greater the discrepancy between partners’ ideals and their perceptions, the lower their overall rating of the relationship and the more distressed and anxious they feel
We compare what we perceive we have in the relationship with pre-existing beliefs and values
comparison levels return! - I have some level to compare things to - update of standard social exchange theory - have an ideal standard, you have an ideal standard
If I get more than I expect, I will be happy
If I get less than I expect, I will be less happy
we have an experience, we compare it to the standards and we determine our happiness on the basis of those standards
Ideal Standards Model: Fletcher and Kininmonth (1992)
everyone has their own standard of what is important or unimportant in their relationship and how satisfying those things are
ask what is your satisfaction of your relationship overall? - the feeling of my relationship as a whole depends on my standards for sex in the relationship
-when sex is important, correlates with satisfaction at .48 (affects the relationship)
-when sex is NOT important, correlates with satisfaction at .04 (it is trivial - doesn’t matter)
-I’m evaluating the relationship on a different basis
common ‘dysfunctional’ beliefs
(eidelson & epstein, 1982)
is it possible to have bad standard?
there are people who are unhappy because they expect too much
there are people who have dysfunctional beliefs and the nature of their dysfunctional beliefs is their standards are too high
- the job of therapists is to identify these unrealistic beliefs and teach them to “chill out” because their relationship doesn’t suck just because it’s not meeting their standards
these unrealistic beliefs are: Disagreement is destructive mindreading is expected sex must be perfect men and women are basically different
Disagreement is destructive
If we fight we much be in a bad relationship
“in a good relationship, people agree all the time”
“in a good relationship, people never fight”
if you hold these beliefs then any disagreement is going to feel like “OMG this is IT, we’re disagreeing!”
but disagreements are INEVITABLE - if you believe this then you are more likely to see a disagreement as a sign of closeness (it’s because I love you that we are disagreeing)
-and disagreements won’t be as destructive