ch 9 Flashcards
The Manufacture of Memory
Refers to the capacity to retain and retrieve
information, and to the changes in the
structures that account for this capacity.
Reconstructive Process
Reconstructive Process
Memory is an active process.
Remember simple information by rote.
Complex information is often altered to make
sense of the material, based on what we already
know.
Source amnesia
The inability to distinguish what you originally
experienced from what you heard or were told about
an event.
H.M. & Reconstructing Memories
Initial Event:
H.M. ate a chocolate Valentine’s Day heart
Stuck the shiny, red wrapper in his pocket
Reconstruction #1:
“Well, it could have been wrapped around a big chocolate heart. It must be
Valentine’s Day”.
Reconstruction #2:
“Well, it could have been wrapped around a big chocolate rabbit. It must be
Easter.”
The Fading Flashbulb
Flashbulb Memories
Vivid recollections of shocking or emotional
events.
Example: tsunamis, explosions, or a violent
shootout.
Reconstructive Process
Remember the central aspects of flashbulb
memories.
Errors affect the details of these memories.
Talarico & Rubin (2003)
Compared ordinary memories with flashbulb
memories.
Initial Questioning:
54 students asked to report the details they
remember about 9/11 and a mundane event
that occurred prior to 9/11.
1, 6, or 32 weeks later:
Questioned about the details.
Completed a questionnaire that measured the
vividness of their memories, and their.
Confidence in the accuracy of these memories.
Talarico & Rubin (2003)
The students reported that flashbulb memories
were more vivid than mundane memories.
They also felt more confident in the accuracy of
flashbulb memories compared to mundane
memories.
Students confidence in flashbulb memories was
misplaced.
Details reported by students became less and
less consistent for both types of memories.
Confabulation
Confusion of an event that happened to someone
else with one that happened to you or
remembering an event when it never actually
happened.
The Conditions of Confabulation
1. Imagination Inflation The more you imagine an event, the more likely you are to believe that you were actually there. 2. Numerous Details Real events tend to produce more details than imagined events. However, the longer you imagine an event, the more details you are likely to add. 3. Easy to imagine If forming an image of an event takes little effort, we tend to think the memory is real. 4. Focus on Emotional Reactions Strong emotional reactions to an imagined event, often convince us that the events really happened.
Eyewitness Testimony
Eyewitness testimony is not always reliable, even when
the witness is confident about the accuracy of their
report.
Mistaken identification increases when:
Suspect and witness differ in ethnicity.
Interviewer employs leading questions, suggestive
comments, and misleading information.
Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Showed participants short films depicting car collisions.
Afterward, researchers asked some participants: “About
how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?”
Other participants were asked the same question, but
with the verb changed to: smashed, collided, bumped,
or contacted
Smashed= 657.7 km/h
Collided= 63.3 km/h
Bumped= 61.3 km/h
Hit= 54.7 km/h
Contacted= 51.2 km/h
Loftus and Zanni (1975)
Showed participants short films depicting car collisions.
Afterward, participants were asked questions about
events that had occurred on film.
Questions contained either:
1. An indefinite article. For example: Did you see a broken
headlight?
2. A definite article: Did you see the broken headlight?
Leading questions influenced participant recall.
Participants who were asked leading questions:
Produced fewer uncertain responses: For Example
“I don’t know”.
More “recognition” of events that never occurred.
For Example: “Yes, I saw the broken headlight.”
Children’s Testimony
Should children’s testimony of traumatic experiences
(e.g., sexual abuse) be trusted?
Children do recollect most events accurately.
Children’s recollections are influenced by
leading questions, suggestive comments, and
misleading information.
Probability of false memories increases when the interviewer:
Seeks confirming evidence and ignores other explanations.
Uses techniques that encourage imagination inflation.
Pressures or encourages the child to agree with them.
Uses bribes or threats to encourage the child to agree with them.
Garven (1998)
Initial Event
Young man visits children at their preschool, reads a story,
and hands out treats.
No inappropriate or aggressive actions occurred.
Interview Period
Experimenter questions the children about the man’s visit.
Group 1= leading questions
Group 2= leading questions influence techniques
Implicit Memory
Unconscious retention in memory, that affects our
current thoughts and actions.
Priming
Read or listen to information.
Later tested to see whether the previously learned
information affects performance on the same or another
type of task.
Implicit Memory
Relearning method
First Exposure: Presented with new information.
Second Exposure: Relearn information.
Master the information more quickly during second exposure.
Models of Memory
Wax Tablet
Memory traces left my experiences.
Library
Storing specific events and facts in an organized fashion
for later retrieval.
Video Camera
Every moment in our lives automatically recorded.
Models of Memory
Memory traces left my experiences.
Library
Storing specific events and facts in an organized fashion
for later retrieval.
Video Camera
Every moment in our lives automatically recorded.
Information Processing Model
Encode
Acquiring information and converting it to a memory record.
Store
Maintaining the record over time.
Represented as concepts, images, or cognitive schemas.
Retrieve
Recovering the information for use.