Ch. 8: deductive arg. Flashcards

1
Q

deductive argument

A

claims that its conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
-presented in the form of syllogisms, with two supporting premises and a conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

form of an argument

A

determined by its layout or pattern of reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

valid

A

-the form of the argument is such that the conclusion must be true if the premises are true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

valid ex:

A

All A are B.
C is A.
C is B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sound

A
  • (1) it is valid, and (2) the premises are true.

- Not all valid arguments for sound. Can still be unsound if one of the premises is false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sound ex:

A

All men are mortal (true)
Socrates is a man (true)
Socrates is mortal (has to be true)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Quantity

A

whether a categorical proposition is universal or particular.

-Particular (qualifiers: “Some”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Quality

A
  • Affirmative (qualifiers: “All,” “Every,” “Some are”)

- Negative (qualifiers: “No,” “None,” “Some are not”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Universal Affirmative

A

All A are B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Universal Negative:

A

No A are B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Particular Affirmative:

A

Some A are B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Particular Negative:

A

Some A are not B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Arguments by Elimination

A

Rule out different possibilities until only one possibility remains.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Arguments by Elimination Ex:

A

It is A, B, or C
It is not A
It is not B
Therefore, it is C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Disjunctive syllogism

A

-argument by elimination

-Either A or B
Not A
Then, B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Arguments Based on Mathematics

A

Depend on mathematical or geometric equations to generate conclusions.

17
Q

Arguments Based on Mathematics Ex:

A

Chris is 6’2”
I am 5’6”
Therefore, Chris is 8” taller than me

18
Q

Arguments of Definition

A

-The conclusion is true because it is based on a key term or essential attribute in a definition.

19
Q

Arguments of Definition Ex:

A

Paulo is a father
All fathers are men
Therefore, Paulo is a man

20
Q

Hypothetical Syllogisms

A
  • A form of deductive argument

- contains two premises, at least one of which is a hypothetical or conditional if…then statement.

21
Q

patterns of hypothetical syllogisms

A
  • Modus ponens (affirming the antecedent)
  • Modus tollens (denying the consequent)
  • Chain arguments
22
Q

Modus Ponens

A

-Affirming the antecedent

If A, then B.
A
Therefore, B

23
Q

Modus Ponens Valid ex:

A

If Barack Obama is president, then he was born in the US.
Barack Obama is president.
Therefore, he was born in the US.

24
Q

Modus Ponens InValid ex:

A

If Oprah Winfrey is president, then she was born in the US.
Oprah Winfrey was born in the US.
Therefore, Oprah Winfrey is president.
Fallacy of affirming the consequent

25
Q

Modus Tollens

A

-(Denies the consequent)

If A, then B
Not B
Therefore, not A.

26
Q

Modus Tollens valid Ex:

A

If Michelle is a physician, then she has graduated from college.
Michelle did not graduate from college.
Therefore, Michelle is not a physician.

27
Q

Modus Tollens invalid Ex:

A

If Michelle is a physician, then she has graduated from college
Michelle is not a physician.
Therefore, she did not graduate from college.
Fallacy of denying the antecedent

28
Q

Chain Arguments

A

Made up of three conditional propositions: (two premises and one conclusion) linked together

If A, then B. (1)
If B, then C. (2)
Therefore, A, then C. (3)

If A, then B. (1)
If B, then C. (2)
If C, then D. (3 )
Therefore, A, then D. (4)

29
Q

standard form:

A

the conditional promise first and the conclusion last.

30
Q

Categorical Syllogisms

A
  • categorizes or sort things into specific classes.
  • conclusion, 2 premises, and 3 terms (each of which occurs exactly twice in 2 of the 3 propositions.)

Example: “All tigers are cats. Some mammals are not cats.
Therefore, some mammals are not tigers.”

31
Q

S term

A

subject

Term that appears first in the conclusion.

32
Q

Minor premise

A

premise in which the S term appears.

33
Q

P term

A

Predicate

Appears second in the conclusion.

34
Q

Major premise:

A

: the premise in which the P term appears

35
Q

M term:

A

middle term, major and minor term.

Occurs only in the two premises

36
Q

Hypothetical Syllogisms validity

A

If the form is valid and the premises are true—> the conclusion is necessarily true.

37
Q

Universal quant.

A
  • “All,” “Every,” “No,” “None”

- All S are P and no S are P —> universal propositions.

38
Q

particular quant.

A
  • refers only to some members of the class

- some S are P and some S are not P