CH 5 legal issues in criminal investigation Flashcards
The _____ states that courts will exclude any evidence that was illegally obtained even though it may be relevant and material
exclusionary rule
This case established that a search made incidental to a lawful arrest must be confined to the area around the suspect’s immediate control.
Chimel v California
In United States vs Leon, it allows the use of evidence obtained by officers acting in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a neutral magistrate but that is ultimately found invalid. This known as ____ exception
Good-faith
Nix v Williams case states that evidence that has been seized illegally or evidence stemming from illegally seized evidence is admissible if the police can prove that ___________
they would have inevitably discovered it anyway by lawful means.
A search warrant benefits the prosecutor by shifting legal burden to the ________
defendant
Florida v Royer held that evidence obtained as a result of a consent search when the detention was made without probable cause is a _______ and will be excluded.
violation of the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights
In order for the officer to stop the citizen from walking away, thus beginning an investigative detention, ______ is required.
reasonable suspicion
in Illinois v Wardlow it was determined that _______ constitutes an additional factor for determining reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigative detention.
fleeing
The Carroll doctrine established that the right to search a vehicle does not depend on the right to arrest the driver but on the premise that the contents of the vehicle
contain evidence of a crime. Because of the mobility of the automobile, the warrantless search under Carroll is justified.
It is the _____ that is one of the most critical aspects of an investigators responsibilities
arrest
the most common type of arrest is that which follows ________
the questioning of a suspect
Investigatory stops are allowed on a lower degree of suspicion than arrests because they are designed to be __________
less intrusive than arrests
What are the 3 key factors based on the totality of the circumstances to use in evaluating the officers use of reasonable force under Graham v Connor
- the severity of the crime committed 2. whether the suspect posed an immediate threat to the safety of officers or others 3. Whether the suspect actively resisted arrest or attempted to evade arrest by flight
Tenessee v Garner (fleeing felon) states reasonable deadly force is authorized under 3 circumstances:
- to prevent an escape when the suspect has threatened an officer with a weapon. 2. when there is a threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others 3. if there is PC to believe that the suspect has committed a crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious physical injury and, when practical, some warning has been given by the officer
Before 1985, police officers were________ by most states to use deadly force in apprehending fleeing felons.
legally authorized