Ch. 4, 5, 6, & 7 Flashcards

1
Q

Case Development

A

The process of putting together the argumentative package to advocate or oppose a proposition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actual Issues

A

are the questions central to the specific need for knowledge or differences of opinion identified by the wording of the proposition you are preparing to argue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Analysis

A
  1. locating the immediate cause of concern about the topic. 2. investigating the history of the topic. 3. defining key terms and creating the primary interface for the topic. 4. determining the actual issues in the controversy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fact

A

posits whether something is true or untrue, but there must always be the potential for controversy, conflict and conversion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Value

A

also involve“taste”inart, literature, music, film, food etc. When you “fight” with friends and colleagues over intellectual issues, you are usually debating claims of ______. For example, you determined that the Menendez brothers killed their parents with a shotgun in the claim of fact, but the claim of value investigates all the reasons, good and bad, for this act, in order to establish intent and/or mitigating circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Policy

A

typically provide a solution or another series of questions in response to the claims of fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Inference

A

A conclusion you have reached on the basis of information you have examined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Primary inference

A

the conclusion you draw about what you believe the proposition means based on the information contained in your definition of key terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Value object

A

The thing you are evaluating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Value judgment term

A

The source of the criteria to make your judgment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stock issues

A

Field-invariant questions pertaining to propositions of fact, value, or policy that must be answered if belief or behavior is to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Value hierarchy

A

The implied or actual order imposed on a set of competing values in resolving a problem, for example, in order to be safe from criminals we may have to give up a little freedom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Value object

A

The portion of the value proposition that identifies an existing idea, person, action, agency, tradition, practice, or custom to be evaluated, the subject of the sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Claim

A

Is your own opinion, the conclusion you form from information on the topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Factual claims

A

Are you what was, is, or will be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Definitional claims

A

Argue how something is to be defined or categorize

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Value claims

A

Argue evaluation or pass judgment on something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Policy claims

A

Argue that something should be done

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Grounds

A

Information of fact or opinion used to verify the claim, also termed evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Warrant

A

The pattern of reasoning that justifies the internal leap from grounds, which are known to be true or probable, to a claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Backing

A

Information that supports the warrant and helps legitimize the inferential leap from grounds to claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Qualifier

A

A statement that shows the degree of force an arguer believes a claim possesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Rebuttal

A

A statement that limits a claim, showing the circumstances under which it might not be true, or a response to an argument that refutes a claim previously made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Evidence

A

Information, taken from material of fact or opinion, used to establish the probable truth of a claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Statistics
Numerical information about people or events used to ground claims
26
Source reliability
The first set of statistics is used to identify the source of the information. Certain agencies and institutions are in the business of getting statistics.
27
Artifacts
Actual exhibits of objects, audio tapes or videotapes, or photographs present it for verification by the audience
28
Premise
Factual evidence that is excepted because it reflects human belief or experience
29
Opinion evidence
Consist of the interpretive and evaluate statements made by an expert in a given field in regard to factual material pertinent to that field
30
Examples and illustrations
Describe or report events, phenomena that exist.
31
Scientific evidence
Reports the result of field and laboratory experiments on the effect of one variable or another
32
Statistics numerically
Represents information about people, events, and phenomena. They may be expressed in the raw numbers or summarized in percentages or averages.
33
Cause
The pattern of reasoning that suggests a temporal connection between phenomena in which the first is capable of producing the second
34
Necessary cause
A cause that must be present for an effect to occur but that is not itself sufficient to produce the effect without the presence of other necessary causes
35
Sufficient cause
A cause that must be present for an effect to occur and is itself capable of producing that effect without the presence of any other causal factors
36
Sign
The pattern of reasoning that suggests a temporal connection between phenomena in which the first is a symptom, condition, or mark used to predict the second
37
Generalization
A form of inductive reasoning in which conclusions are drawn about an entire class of events or individuals
38
Parallel case
Arguments using _____________ involves reasoning on the basis of two or more similar events or cases
39
Analogy
Arguments from ______ assume some fundamental sameness exist between the characteristics of dissimilar cases
40
Authority
As a form of reasoning, argument from ________ relies on the credibility and expertise of the source to warrant acceptance of a claim
41
Dilemma
An argument from _______ forces a choice between two unacceptable alternatives
42
Argumentation
Is a form of instrumental communication relying on reasoning and proof to influence belief or behavior through the use of spoken or written messages
43
Audience
Argumentation consist of one or more persons who are capable of being influenced, who may except or reject, the arguers message
44
Ethics
Is the term we use to indicate the moral choices a person makes regarding his or her behavior
45
Field of argument
Contacts = politics, conspiracy theories, religion, academic, class, law, parenting
46
Proposition
Fact = true, value = moral, policy = what to do
47
Prima Facie, presumption
Advocates Opponents
48
Burden of proof
Is the obligation of the advocate to contest the ground by offering arguments that are logically sufficient to challenge presumption
49
Reasoning
Makes the connection between claims and the evidence used to ground them
50
The process of putting together the argumentative package to advocate or oppose a proposition.
Case Development
51
are the questions central to the specific need for knowledge or differences of opinion identified by the wording of the proposition you are preparing to argue.
Actual Issues
52
1. locating the immediate cause of concern about the topic. 2. investigating the history of the topic. 3. defining key terms and creating the primary interface for the topic. 4. determining the actual issues in the controversy.
Analysis
53
posits whether something is true or untrue, but there must always be the potential for controversy, conflict and conversion.
Fact
54
also involve“taste”inart, literature, music, film, food etc. When you “fight” with friends and colleagues over intellectual issues, you are usually debating claims of \_\_\_\_\_\_. For example, you determined that the Menendez brothers killed their parents with a shotgun in the claim of fact, but the claim of value investigates all the reasons, good and bad, for this act, in order to establish intent and/or mitigating circumstances.
Value
55
typically provide a solution or another series of questions in response to the claims of fact.
Policy
56
A conclusion you have reached on the basis of information you have examined
Inference
57
the conclusion you draw about what you believe the proposition means based on the information contained in your definition of key terms
Primary inference
58
The thing you are evaluating
Value object
59
The source of the criteria to make your judgment
Value judgment term
60
Field-invariant questions pertaining to propositions of fact, value, or policy that must be answered if belief or behavior is to change
Stock issues
61
The implied or actual order imposed on a set of competing values in resolving a problem, for example, in order to be safe from criminals we may have to give up a little freedom
Value hierarchy
62
The portion of the value proposition that identifies an existing idea, person, action, agency, tradition, practice, or custom to be evaluated, the subject of the sentence
Value object
63
Is your own opinion, the conclusion you form from information on the topic
Claim
64
Are you what was, is, or will be
Factual claims
65
Argue how something is to be defined or categorize
Definitional claims
66
Argue evaluation or pass judgment on something
Value claims
67
Argue that something should be done
Policy claims
68
Information of fact or opinion used to verify the claim, also termed evidence
Grounds
69
The pattern of reasoning that justifies the internal leap from grounds, which are known to be true or probable, to a claim
Warrant
70
Information that supports the warrant and helps legitimize the inferential leap from grounds to claims
Backing
71
A statement that shows the degree of force an arguer believes a claim possesses
Qualifier
72
A statement that limits a claim, showing the circumstances under which it might not be true, or a response to an argument that refutes a claim previously made
Rebuttal
73
Information, taken from material of fact or opinion, used to establish the probable truth of a claim
Evidence
74
Numerical information about people or events used to ground claims
Statistics
75
The first set of statistics is used to identify the source of the information. Certain agencies and institutions are in the business of getting statistics.
Source reliability
76
Actual exhibits of objects, audio tapes or videotapes, or photographs present it for verification by the audience
Artifacts
77
Factual evidence that is excepted because it reflects human belief or experience
Premise
78
Consist of the interpretive and evaluate statements made by an expert in a given field in regard to factual material pertinent to that field
Opinion evidence
79
Describe or report events, phenomena that exist.
Examples and illustrations
80
Reports the result of field and laboratory experiments on the effect of one variable or another
Scientific evidence
81
Represents information about people, events, and phenomena. They may be expressed in the raw numbers or summarized in percentages or averages.
Statistics numerically
82
The pattern of reasoning that suggests a temporal connection between phenomena in which the first is capable of producing the second
Cause
83
A cause that must be present for an effect to occur but that is not itself sufficient to produce the effect without the presence of other necessary causes
Necessary cause
84
A cause that must be present for an effect to occur and is itself capable of producing that effect without the presence of any other causal factors
Sufficient cause
85
The pattern of reasoning that suggests a temporal connection between phenomena in which the first is a symptom, condition, or mark used to predict the second
Sign
86
A form of inductive reasoning in which conclusions are drawn about an entire class of events or individuals
Generalization
87
Arguments using _____________ involves reasoning on the basis of two or more similar events or cases
Parallel case
88
Arguments from ______ assume some fundamental sameness exist between the characteristics of dissimilar cases
Analogy
89
As a form of reasoning, argument from ________ relies on the credibility and expertise of the source to warrant acceptance of a claim
Authority
90
An argument from _______ forces a choice between two unacceptable alternatives
Dilemma
91
Is a form of instrumental communication relying on reasoning and proof to influence belief or behavior through the use of spoken or written messages
Argumentation
92
Argumentation consist of one or more persons who are capable of being influenced, who may except or reject, the arguers message
Audience
93
Is the term we use to indicate the moral choices a person makes regarding his or her behavior
Ethics
94
Contacts = politics, conspiracy theories, religion, academic, class, law, parenting
Field of argument
95
Fact = true, value = moral, policy = what to do
Proposition
96
Advocates Opponents
Prima Facie, presumption
97
Is the obligation of the advocate to contest the ground by offering arguments that are logically sufficient to challenge presumption
Burden of proof
98
Makes the connection between claims and the evidence used to ground them
Reasoning
99
based on the first impression; accepted as correct until proved otherwise
Prima Facie-
100
Prima Facie
based on the first impression; accepted as correct until proved otherwise​
101
an act or instance of taking something to be true or adopting a particular attitude toward something, especially at the start of a chain of argument or action
presumption-
102
presumption
an act or instance of taking something to be true or adopting a particular attitude toward something, especially at the start of a chain of argument or action