Ch 3. Social Perception Flashcards
Nonverbal Communication:
Define it - what does it rely on?
Communication between individuals that doesn't involve the spoken language - it's relatively irrepressible. it relies on: - facial expressions - eye movements - body language (movements and posture) - touch
Paralanguage:
Define it - what does it include?
Vocal effects that communicate emotion independent from the words being expressed.
Such effects include:
- tone (attitude conveyed through sounds)
- pitch (highness to lowness of sound)
- volume
- rhythm (speed and fluency)
The Facial-Feedback Hypothesis:
How does it perceive the relationship between our body and our emotions - What does it suggest?
It’s the view that facial expressions can trigger emotions
> that our actions and nonverbal behaviors influence our feelings.
it suggests that:
we only show what we feel in our expressions and that those expressions, in turn, influence how we feel.
When are we best at detecting deception - Why?
Why are we not better at identifying deception?
When we’re in a negative affective state rather than a positive affective state.
A: When in a positive state we typically think heuristically and pay more attention to irrelevant cues within the environment.
B: When in a negative affect we tend to pay closer attention to the words and meaning of the message, thus using more controlled processing.
> our tendency to perceive others as truthful and our desires to be polite result in us not looking for or being reluctant to discover and report deception.
Few nonverbal cues moderately reveal deception, what are they?
- Microexpressions:
> fleeting facial expressions lasting only a few tenths of a second. - Interchangeable discrepancies:
> i.e. between facial expressions and body language. - Linguistic styles:
> i.e. change in rhythm.
List two tactics we use to increase our interpersonal attractiveness.
- Self-enhancement:
> efforts to increase our appeal to others. - Other-enhancement:
> efforts to make a targeted person feel good.
Attribution:
What is attribution and Why do we engage in it?
attribution is the process through which we:
- Seek to Identify the Causes of others Behaviors, and
- Gain Insight into their stable Traits and Intentions.
we engage in attributions to:
- obtain information about others traits, motives, and intentions; in efforts to understand their behavior.
Theory of Correspondent Inferences (Joan’s and Davis; 1965):
What does it suggest?
Why can it be misleading?
Under what conditions are we most likely to infer that overt behaviors reflect stable traits?
it suggests that we attempt to infer whether others possess specific and stable dispositions based on their overt behavior.
> it focuses on internal factors over external causes of one’s behavior.
- when the behavior appears to be Freely Chosen,
- when the behavior yields noncommon effects, and
- when the behavior is low in social desirability or violates social norms.
Kelley’s Covariation Theory:
What does it suggest?
it suggests we attempt to Answer Why people Engage in a Behavior by Attributing it to Internal, External, or Mixed factors, as a result of considering:
- consensus,
- consistency, and
- distinctiveness
According to Kelley’s Covariation Theory, when are we most likely to attribute another’s behavior to:
a) Internal Factors
b) External Factors
c) Mixed factors
- when Consensus + Distinctiveness are Low and Consistency is High = attribute behavior to Internal factors.
- when Consensus + Consistency + Distinctiveness are all High = attribute behavior to External factors.
- when consensus is Low and Consistency + Distinctiveness are High = attribute behavior to both internal and external causes.
Consensus
the extent to which others react to a given stimulus or event in the same manner as the person we are evaluating.
Consistency
the extent to which the person we’re evaluating reacts to the stimulus or event in the same way over time.
Distinctiveness
the extent to which the person we’re evaluating reacts to different stimulus or events in the same manner.
Action Identification
the levels of interpretation we place on an action.
- low levels focus on the action itself (concrete).
- high levels focus on the actions ultimate goal (abstract).
Depending on whether we view others actions as concrete or abstract, how does this affect our attributions?
When we view others actions concretely:
- we view their actions as having little or no meaning beyond the action itself;
- therefore, tend to make few attributions about the persons intentions or higher-order cognition.
When we view others actions abstractly:
- we view their actions as having higher meaning;
- therefore, we attribute much greater mental activity to them as a reflection of their goals, characteristics, intentions, and mind.