Ch 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Crime

A

Prohibition against certain conduct + penalty for violating prohibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Criminal law

A

Definitions of crimes; specifications of penalties; general principles concerning criminal responsibility, major defences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2 Sources of Criminal law

A

1) Legislation 2) Judicial decisions (incl. common law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Federal Parliament enacts what? According to what?

A

1) Criminal law & procedures relating to criminal matters 2) Constitution Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Third element to definition of crime

A

Prohibition/penalty must be enacted against “public evil” / injurious behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Indictable offenses carry more or less serious penalties than summary convictions?

A

More

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Provinces and territories enact legislation about what?

A

Health, education, highways, liquor control, hunting and fishing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common law

A

Body of judge-made law that has evolved in areas not covered by legislation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

One existing common law offense in Canada

A

Contempt of court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Two cases where Charter was used to override criminal law?

A

1) Regulation of prostitution 2) Medical assistance in dying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Exception to Charter rights?

A

Reasonable limits on Charter rights as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society -> child pornography laws don’t infringe on freedom of thought, belief, expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Actus reus

A

Particular event or state of affairs was “caused” by the accused person’s conduct (mental element: act must be voluntary)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mens rea

A

Harmful conduct was accompanied by a certain state of mind. Guilty mind, wrongful intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Three components of Actus reus

A

1) Conduct 2) Surrounding “material” circumstances 3) Consequences of voluntary conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Offense that doesn’t require proof of consequences for actus reus

A

Perjury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is failure to act part of the conduct in actus reus?

A

Only if accused was in legal obligation to act (eg. a parent, a prison guard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Automatism defense

A

Accused persons plunged into state of impaired consciousness and are not aware of what’s happening around them

18
Q

Subjective mens rea

A

Determination of what actually went on in the accused person’s mind

19
Q

3 forms of subjective mens rea

A

1) Intention and knowledge 2) Recklessness 3) Willful blindness

20
Q

Objective mens rea

A

Whether a reasonable person, in the same circumstances and with the same knowledge as the accused, would have appreciated the risk involved in the accused’s conduct and would have taken steps to avoid the commission of the actus reus

21
Q

Example of intention and knowledge

A

Knowingly committing incest; planned and deliberate murder, not impulsively

22
Q

Example of recklessness

A

Smoking near a flammable haystack, throwing cigarette onto haystack and causing it to light on fire

23
Q

Minimum standard for objective liability

A

Marked departure from standard of care expected of the reasonable person acting prudently

24
Q

Crown vs defendant has to prove what in regulatory offenses?

A

Crown proves actus reus; Defendant proves that they were not negligent

25
Q

3 cases to be party to criminal offense

A

1) Commits offense 2) Aids another person committing it 3) Encourages person to commit it

26
Q

Is it still party to a crime if the offense was committed differently than was incited?

A

Yes

27
Q

2 requirements to be party to offense having formed common intention even without being there

A

1) offense was committed to carry out “common purpose” 2) all members knew that commission of offense would be probably consequence of carrying out common purpose

28
Q

Inchoate crime

A

When someone tries to commit a crime but isn’t successful

29
Q

3 types of inchoate crimes

A

Attempt, conspiracy, counselling

30
Q

Counselling

A

Inticing another person to commit crime

31
Q

Is it possible to convict of criminal attempt even if the actual crime would’ve been impossible?

A

Y

32
Q

Conspiracy

A

Agreement by two or more people to commit

33
Q

Can convict of conspiracy if it’s one person plus an undercover cop planning to murder?

A

No – need two people with mens rea

34
Q

NCRMD

A

Not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder

35
Q

Is NCRMD if OCD impulse to commit crime?

A

No

36
Q

Mistake of fact

A

Not knowing the truth, eg. getting a second marriage believing your first husband is dead. Does not apply to ignorance of law

37
Q

Necessity

A

Committing lesser evil crime in order to avoid committing greater evil (eg. Alpinist breaking into cabin to avoid death)

38
Q

Duress

A

when defendant is forced to commit crime as a consequence of threats of death

39
Q

Provocation

A

Partial defense to murder (reduces to manslaughter).

40
Q

Two requirements of provocation

A

1) Accused responded to commission of serious crime by victim 2) Accused acted suddenly, before there was time for passion to cool

41
Q

Self defense

A

May use reasonable amount of force if resonably believe that they (or someone) is target of actual force or threatened