Ch. 11: Managing Conflict Flashcards
conflict (according to William Wilmot & Joyce Hocker) (351)
an expressed struggle b/w at least 2 interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from the other party in achieving their goals
What is conflict? (351)
- expressed struggle (351): both ppl must know it exists
- perceived incompatible goals (351): all conflicts look as if one person’s gain would be another’s loss
- perceived scarce resources (352): when ppl believe there isn’t enough of something to go around
- interdependence (352): must take the “we’re all in this together” attitude to resolve anything
- inevitability (352-353): frequency of college student + family + couple conflicts
Functional & Dysfunctional Conflicts (353)
the difference doesn’t rest on the subject of the conflict… moreso the method of resolution
dysfunctional conflict (353)
the outcomes fall short of what is possible & have a damaging effect on the relationship
functional conflict (353)
participants achieve the best possible outcome, even strengthening the relationship
Integration versus Polarization (354)
-ppl in functional conflict are problem-oriented, focusing on solving the problem in a way that works for everybody
Cooperation versus Opposition (354)
- in dysfunctional conflict, ppl see eachother as opponents
- functional conflict = cooperation may bring an answer that leaves everyone happy
Confirmation versus Disconfirmation (355)
- using supportive behaviors
- remain affectionate
- ppl may disagree but they are not disagreeable
Agreement versus Coercion (355)
- “Do it my way, or else” (Tuval-Mashiach & Shulman, 2006)
- Tools: money, favors, friendliness, sex, physical coercion
ex. authoritarian parents turning children’s requests into “unreasonable demands”
De-escalation versus Escalation (355)
-one clear sign of functional conflict is that in the long run the behaviors of the participants solve more problems than they create
Focusing versus Drifting (355)
-in drifting, the original issue becomes lost as the conflict expands
“Kitchen sink fighers” (356)
dysfunctional battlers; George Bach & Peter Wyden (1983) – not “one problem at a time” solvers
Foresight versus Shortsightedness (356)
- being “right”
- overlooking a possible solution
- jumping into conflict w/o considering more constructive solutions
-foresight helps participants “pick their battles wisely”
Positive versus Negative Results (357)
2 consequences of dysfunctional relationships:
- no one gets what they want
- conflicts can threaten the future of the relationship
benefit of functional relationships:
-reward of successfully facing a challenge; growth
Conflict Styles (357-366)
Avoidance (Lose-Lose) Accommodation (Lose-Win) Competition (Win-Lose) Compromise (Negotiated Lose-Lose) Collaboration (Win-Win)
avoidance (358)
- when ppl nonassertively ignore or stay away from conflict
- low concern for their own needs & interests of other person
- “selectively ignoring” other person’s minor flaws is ok
accommodation (360)
- when we allow others to have their own way rather than asserting our own point of view
- low concern for self & high concern for others
Asian cultures (360)
high-context, collectivistic backgrounds
-regard avoidance & accommodation as face-saving & noble ways to handle conflict
United States culture (360)
low-context, individualistic cultures
-avoidance & accommodation viewed less positively
Competition (361)
- high concern for self & low concern for others
- opposite of accommodation
- “my way”
- Laura Tracy (1991) says we live in a competitive society
- Susan Messman & Rebecca Mikesell (2000): competition as a measure of regard
Passive aggression (361)
occurs when a communicator expresses dissatisfaction in a disguised manner
-can take the form of “crazymaking” (Bach & Wyden, 1983) – tactics designed to punish another person w/o direct confrontation (guilt!)
direct aggression (362)
- lashes out to attack the source of displeasure
- Dominic Infante (1987) identified 9 types:
1. character attacks
2. competence attacks
3. physical appearance attacks
4. maledictions (wishing bad fortune)
5. teasing
6. ridicule
7. threats
8. swearing
9. nonverbal emblems (fist shaking, waving arms..)
compromise (362)
gives both ppl at least some of what they want
- both partially sacrifice
- Albert Filley (1975) and compromising values