Ch 11 - Liability Of Accoutants And Other Professionals Flashcards
Accountant liability for negligence
Fail to exercise care of a competent, reasonable professional
At minimum, follow GAAP and GAAS
Defenses for negligence
Deny failing to meet professional standards
Argue that failure isn’t cause of client’s loss
Contributory/comparative negligence of client
Accountant liability for breach of contract
Engagement letter - explicit promise for contractural tasks, implicit promise for competent and professional work according to relevant standards
Accountant liability for fraud
Accountant misrepresented a material fact
Accountant acted with intent to deceive
Client justifiably relied on misrepresentation
Client suffered an injury by relying on fraudulent information
Meet these 4 criteria = actual fraud
Constructive fraud
Fraud without fraudulent intent (gross negligence)
3 groupings of common law accountant liability to 3rd parties
Privity or near privity (ultrameres)
Foreseen users and classes of users (Restatement rule)
Reasonably foreseeable users
Ultrameres rule
Accountant held liable for negligence only to those whose primary benefit the accounting statements were prepared for
Restatement rule
An accountant is liable to known third party users of the accountant’s work product and those in the limited class whose reliance on the work the accountant specifically foresaw
Reasonably foreseeable users test
Accountant is liable to any 3rd party who was or should have been foreseen as a possible user of the accountant’s work product and who did in fact use and rely on that work product for a proper business purpose
Working papers
Various documents used and developed during an audit (notes, calculations, copies, memos, etc)
After audit acct is legal owner, information within belongs to client
Accountant client privilege
Right of an accountant to refuse to reveal any information given to him during the course of providing accounting services to a client
Not recognized by common/federal law, but some states adopt a form of it (weaker than attorney-client privilege)
Securities act of 1933
Accountants civilly liable for misstatements and omissions of material facts made in registration statements the SEC requires
Plaintiff need not prove reliance on statement to establish privity
Defenses against securities act of 1933
Prove due diligence by showing no fraud or negligence committed (no misstatements, omissions exist)
Contest liability on grounds of materiality
No causal connection to purchaser’s loss
Purchaser knew of misstatements/omissions
Securities exchange act of 1934
Accountants are liable to fraudulent statements made to the SEC in documents filed with it
Requires higher burden of proof: plaintiff must prove the false/misleading statements affected the price of the security, and reliance was placed upon the statement without knowledge of its inaccuracy
Defense against securities exchange act of 1934
Good faith requirement fulfilled
Accountant proves plaintiff knew statements were false