Ch 1 Intro To Victimology Flashcards
What is victim precipitation?
Victim Precipitation:
The extent to which a victim is responsible for their own victimization. Example, the victim being drunk and causing a fight.
What is victimology?
Victimology, then, is the study of the etiology (or causes) of victimization, its consequences, how the criminal justice system accommodates and assists victims, and how other elements of society, such as the media, deal with crime victims. Victimology is a science; victimologists use the scientific method to answer questions about victims
What is Lex talions?
The concept of “an eye for an eye”
What is retribution?
Retribution:
A criminal is punished because they deserved it, and the punishment is equal to the harm caused
What is restitution?
Restitution:
Money or services paid to victims of crimes by the offenders
What is the code of Hammurabi?
Code of Hammurabi:
Early Babylonian code that emphasized the restoration of equity between the offender and the victim
What is Victim Facilitation?
Victim facilitation occurs when a victim unintentionally makes it easier for an offender to commit a crime. A victim may, in this way, be a catalyst for victimization. A woman who accidentally left her purse in plain view in her office while she went to the restroom and then had it stolen would be a victim who facilitated her own victimization.
What is Victim Provocation?
Victim provocation occurs when a person does something that incites another person to commit an illegal act. Provocation suggests that without the victim’s behavior, the crime would not have occurred. Provocation, then, most certainly connotes blame. In fact, the offender is not at all responsible.
Who is Hans Von Hentig?
Hans von Hentig:
Developed a victim typology based on characteristics of the victim that increase risk of victimization.
He argued that crime victims could be placed into one of 13 categories based on their propensity for victimization: (1) young, (2) females, (3) old, (4) immigrants, (5) depressed, (6) mentally defective/deranged, (7) the acquisitive, (8) dull normals, (9) minorities, (10) wanton, (11) the lonesome and heartbroken, (12) tormentor, and (13) the blocked, exempted, and fighting. All these victims are targeted and contribute to their own victimization because of their characteristics.
Who is the father of victimology?
Benjamin Mendelsohn:
Father of victimology; coined the term victimology in the mid-1940s.
He then created a classification of victims based on their culpability, or the degree of the victim’s blame. His classification entailed the following:
1. Completely innocent victim: a victim who bears no responsibility at all for victimization; victimized simply because of his or her nature, such as being a child
2. Victim with minor guilt: a victim who is victimized due to ignorance; a victim who inadvertently places themself in harm’s way
3. Victim as guilty as offender/voluntary victim: a victim who bears as much responsibility as the offender; a person who, for example, enters into a suicide pact
4. Victim more guilty than offender: a victim who instigates or provokes their own victimization
5. Most guilty victim: a victim who is victimized during the perpetration of a crime or as a result of crime
6. Simulating or imaginary victim: a victim who is not victimized at all but, instead, fabricates a victimization event
Who is Stephen Schafer?
Schafer also proposed a victim typology. Using both social characteristics and behaviors, his typology places victims in groups based on how responsible they are for their own victimization. In this way, it includes facets of von Hentig’s typology based on personal characteristics and Mendelsohn’s typology rooted in behavior. He argued that people have a functional responsibility not to provoke others into victimizing or harming them and that they also should actively attempt to prevent that from occurring. He identified seven categories and labeled their levels of responsibility as follows:
1. Unrelated victims—no responsibility
2. Provocative victims—share responsibility
3. Precipitative victims—some degree of responsibility
4. Biologically weak victims—no responsibility
5. Socially weak victims—no responsibility
6. Self-victimizing—total responsibility
7. Political victims—no responsibility
Who is Marvin Wolfgang?
Marvin Wolfgang
The first person to empirically investigate victim precipitation was Marvin Wolfgang (1957) in his classic study of homicides occurring in Philadelphia from 1948 to 1952. He examined some 558 homicides to see to what extent victims precipitated their own deaths. In those instances in which the victim was the direct, positive precipitator in the homicide, Wolfgang labeled the incident as victim precipitated. For example, the victim in such an incident would be the first to brandish or use a weapon, the first to strike a blow, and the first to initiate physical violence. He found that 26% of all homicides in Philadelphia during this period were victim precipitated.
What is Subintentional Homicide?
Subintentional Homicide:
The victim facilitates their own death by using poor judgment, placing themself at risk, living a risky lifestyle, or using alcohol or drugs
Who is Menachem Amir?
Menachem Amir:
Studied victim provocation in rapes.
he conducted his study using data from Philadelphia, although he examined rapes that occurred from 1958 to 1960. He examined the extent to which victims precipitated their own rapes and identified common attributes of victim-precipitated rape. Amir labeled almost 1 in 5 rapes as victim precipitated. He found that these rapes were likely to involve alcohol and that the victim was likely to engage in what was then considered seductive behavior, such as wear revealing clothing, use risqué language, and have a bad reputation.
Who made Typologies?
Hans von Hentig, Benjamin Mendelsohn, and Stephen Schafer each proposed victim typologies used to classify victims in terms of their responsibility or role in their own victimization.
Marvin Wolfgang and Menachem Amir conducted the first empirical examinations of victim precipitation. Wolfgang studied homicides in Philadelphia, and Amir focused on forcible rapes. Wolfgang found that 26% of homicides were victim precipitated. Amir concluded that 19% of forcible rapes were precipitated by the victim.