Case Study Flashcards
When was the property extended and did you carry out any checks to establish valid permissions had been granted?
I checked the Edinburgh Council Planning portal and the owner did have PP to build this extension.
Explain why you measured using NIA, why Zone the unit, what do you mean by Zone A and Zone B?
I complied with RICS Code of Measuring Practice 2007 (effective May 2015) Reinstated in 2018.
The rationale behind zoning is associated with the principle that the space closest to the front of the shop (the zone A area) has the highest value because it benefits the most from window display and foot traffic, making it the prime retailing area. Therefore, it attracts the highest rent per square foot. After zone A, the value of retail space typically diminishes the further it is from the shop front
Measure to zones of 9.14 m depth
Market custom prevails
Zone A 100%, Zone B 50%, Zone C 25% etc. ancillary at 10%
Give a floor area In Terms of Zone A ‘ITZA’
Return frontage – market standard 9.14x9.14
For properties with a heavy frontage (small windows, typical old banks etc.) may apply a reduction factor to zone A as it will not benefit from the exposure
Did you not discuss with your client what was likely to happen regarding existing lease – was it going to be extended rather than simply assume it would be vacant in 10 months’ time and factor in void period in your valuation?
I did, while at the time of valuation discussions were in place, nothing had been agreed and as agreed in the TOE with the client I valued this property assuming that the tenant would not renew their lease agreement.
From an inspection perspective, what sort of defects would you be looking out for when surveying a property such as this one?
As the purpose of inspection was for valuation reasons. I was insepocting to understand any factors which could influence the valuation. From a construction strand point this included the current condition and defects such as:
* Movement such as cracking in in the brickwork
* Any evidence of leaking or damp.
* As this was a period building with a modern fit out I was looking for dry rot, wet rot, water ingress around the door and window openings, tile slippage.
Also looked at the surrounding area in terms of vacant borads and footfall
Why adopt £26/sqft to establish market rent? You could be criticised why not opt for a lower figure given that some comps used were much lower in floor area and analysed figure cold include element of inverse quantum. Furthermore, you have referred to new leases in your analysis – was the analysed rate net of any incentives granted? Did you make any other adjustments to reflect rent review pattern, insurance liability etc?
there have been a number of new leases signed in recent times which has established a relatively distinct rental tone which I feel sits comfortably between £20-£30 per sq ft Zone A and therefore I regarded the property as Broadley rack rented.
On this basis, I applied a Zone A rate of £26 per sq ft over our calculated reduced floor area (ITZA)
The comparable evidence shows the headline rate. The new leases were analysed taking into account the rnet free period which each had 3 months and therefore as market practice dictates, this 3 month period was ignored.
Each of the comps were on an FRI bases and therefore did not have to account for this. Regarding rent review patterns, market practice dictates analysing to the nearest lease event such as a rent review or break option.
hierarchy of evidence?
I was aware the heriarchy of evidence as highlighted in RICS professional standards and guidance, global Comparable evidence in real estate valuation 1st edition, October 2019.
- Open market lettings
- Lease renewals
- Rent reviews
- 3rd party determinations
- Sale and Leasebacks
- Intercompany transactions
Explain what you mean by, “rack-rented”?
A property that is rack rented means it’s let out at the full market rental value. Rack rent represents the sum that a tenant will reasonably pay in open market conditions without taking into account any premium or other beneficial lease terms.
Why do you apply different capitalisation rates in a Term & Reversion valuation?
different capitalisation rates are applied for the present term income and the reversionary income to reflect the different risk profiles and timing of the cash flows.
The term income or the current rent is usually regarded as less risky. It’s a contractually agreed upon - ideally with a good covenant tenant - and will typically be received in the near future. Therefore, a lower yield or capitalisation rate is applied to reflect that this income is more secure. 2. The Reversionary Income: The reversionary income on the other hand is the rental income that the property might achieve when it is re-let in the future after the expiry of the current lease. This kind of income is regarded as being more risky because it is not guaranteed and is dependent on future market conditions. Therefore, a higher capitalisation rate is applied to reflect these uncertainties and potential risks.
Would the layer/hardcore method produce the same result?
- Used for over-rented properties
- Bottom slice = market rent – done in to perpetuity at an IY
- Top slice = difference between PR and MR – capitalised at a higher yield up until the next lease event (riskier)
The two methods will produce different results unless the incremental rent in the hardcore method is capitalised at an appropriate marginal rate that reflects its risk. The marginal rate is the rate that equates the value of the incremental rent with the difference between the values of the term and reversion in the term reversion method1. The choice of valuation method may depend on the availability and reliability of comparable evidence, as well as the preferences and expectations of clients and valuers.
It’s critical to note that while all these methods are useful as part of a RICS APC candidate toolkit, none provide a definitive market value without relevant market evidence to back up the yield applied. Therefore, it’s important to highlight that though these methods are fundamentally different in their approaches, they will likely produce similar results for simple income profiles, but for more complex profiles, the results could have variations.
The Term and Reversion method is simpler, dealing with a single lease to expiry or out of the option to break, then placing the reversion to the full rental value. This can be faster but lacks the more precise granularity of the Layer Method.
How did you measure covenant strength to your comparable when calculating MV?
While a number of the comparable were regarded as having local covenants with only one comparable which was occupied by boots a national retailer.
Dunn and Broadstreet reports are used to check covenants.
What are Dun & Bradstreet report ratings?
- Financial Strength (1A-5A, A-H)
- Risk Indicator (1-4)
How would you use accounts for a covenant check?
- Profits text – net profit is 3 times the annual rent payable
- Creditsafe checks
Why might management accounts be of use?
- When undertaking a tenant covenant check, the annual audited accounts may not be prepared for the year at that time and management accounts may be able to give an indication of the tenant’s financial position at the time of the transaction rather than relying on historical account data
Why add 50 points to initial yield – why not 100?
Adjusting the capitalisation rate or initial yield by adding points is a subjective decision that involves careful judgment based on the property, its perceived risk, and market conditions. An adjustment of 50 basis points (0.50%) is typically added to the initial yield to account for inherent risks and uncertainties in the property market. Adding 100 basis points or 1% would imply a significantly higher level of risk associated with the property or investment.
The extent of the yield adjustment is very much down to the valuer’s assessment of the risk profile of the investment based on how I risky I perceived the re-letting of the unit.
You will need to be ready for questions on your justification of 6 months marketing, 3 months RF, and what the actual costs applied were for empty rates, marketing etc.
Local market dynamics and the supply / demand imbalance for retail space in this area suggests a 6-12 month letting void would be appropriate should the Property become vacant and available to lease on the open market. 6 months marketing is based of speaking with agents and 3 months rent free is market norm.
line with market norms we have assumed that the Tenant will vacate in October 2023 and thereafter applied a 9 months’ expiry void. This void is inclusive of a 6 months’ marketing period to secure an alternative occupier, plus short 3 months’ rent free period towards shop fit-out.