Case Study Flashcards
How did you complete the conflicts of interest check?
I completed the conflicts of interest check in line with my companies policy. This is to send a company wide email detailing the details of the property, the client and the borrower. Each person at the company has to fill in a microsoft teams form to confirm if there is a conflict or not.
Talk me through your clients service agreement
My clients service agreement sets out the guidance for a secured lending valuation for this bank. It details what must be included in the report and the investigations that are required. I covers all the required points of a red book terms of engagement. It includes the basis of value, structure of the report, PII cover depending on valuation figure, conformation the valuer is competent and the firms complaints handling procedure
Why did this mean that you do not use a terms of engagement?
The service agreement is common for large commercial banks as this covers all the basis of the terms of engagement and due to the size of the bank and level of instructions each firm they work with will sign their service agreement.
How did you confirm competence?
I worked under the supervision of my supervisor who is an RICS registered valuer
What was the EPC rating?
C
Was there any planning issues?
I did not identify any planning issues that would impact the value.
The property was under an article 4 direction, this was not a concern as there was no intention to look at a residential conversion.
What due diligence did you undertake?
EPC rating
Rateable value
Flood risk
Title plan
Contamination
Planning
Why did you complete a groundsure report?
It is a requirement under the service agreement
Talk to me about the location of the property
The property was located to the north of Watford’s town centre near the watford north railway station. The property was located in close proximity to junction 5 of the M1 motorway providing good access to London and the North
How did you age the property?
Information from the client
Talk me through the construction of the property?
The property comprises a single bay industrial warehouse of steel truss frame construction with brick and blockwork walls as well as metal profile cladding on the east side. There was a metal insulated rood with plastic corrugated sky lights.
Was there anything to look out for on your inspection (defects)?
Evidence of leaks around the roof lights
Damage to cladding panels
Evidence of blocked gutters or damage from poor guttering
Did you find any defects?
There was no defects that would adversely affect the property.
There was signs of aging
Why did you measure the eaves height?
Eaves height are important in an industrial property as it provides the occupier greater flexibility to store upwards. A requirement for occupiers to have good eaves height so it is important when analysing comparables.
What is eaves height?
The height between the floor surface and the underside of the roof covering or supporting purlins. Whichever is lower.
Is it common to have no office content? What is standard office contetnt?
No
5-10%
What is standard site coverage?
40%
Why did you measure to GIA?
This is the appropriate measurement standards according the RICS code of measuring practice, 2015
Why did Odhams trading estate achieve a higher rental value?
Odhams trading estate is comparable to the property in relation to its location and size. However, Odhams has a superior eaves height of 8m which would appeal to a bigger range of occupiers, it also benefits good parking provisions and internal office accomodation.
Why did you analyse net effective rents?
I analysed the net effective rent to devalue the headline rent to calculate the actual rent
How did you calculate the net effective rent?
I used the straight line method and deducted 3 months from the rent free period to allow for a fitting out period
Unit 10 shakespeare - why did you select a comparable much smaller than the Property?
Because there was a lack of directly comparable properties, this property was a recent letting in the locality so determined that this was appropriate to gauge the local market
Why did unit 10 Shakespeare achieve a lower rental level?
Because of its low eaves height and weak specification
How did you compare 2a Greycaine road to your property?
I considered this to be a good comparable as its located in the same area as the property and has similar specification. However, 2a was small and let for a short term of 3 years so I determined that 1a 6 would achieve a lower rental level
How did the hierarchy of evidence held to analyse comparables?
This guidance note outline three categories of comparables to determine which comparables are the most appropriate.
Category A - Direct comparables
Category B - Market trends / indicies
Category C - Evidence from other asset classes
What trends did you identify?
I identified that properties with good eaves heights would achieve strong rents and that properties transacting in this market where agreeing terms of 10 years with minimal incentives
Why did you anticipate strong demand?
Because there was minimal vacancies in the locality.
This property presented relatively cheap secure warehouse in close proximity to London
Why did you choose the middle of this range?
With reference to the selected comparables, I felt that Shakespeare estate represented the bottom end of the market as it was not appealing to the same tenant profiles, it has particularly low eaves heights and small space. In comparison, Odhams benefited an eaves height stronger than Shakespeare and Greycaine road. It also had good yard provisions.
K I 2
Why did you select the comparable method?
Becaus the property was owner occupied and did not have income stream to analyse.
Talk me through your internal database?
The internal database is used to input all comparable evidence that is identified by the team. It has a form to input all relevant information about the comp and links to the brochure. Each valuer must confirm the source of the information and make detailed notes of any discussions with the agent.
Unit 13 Shakespeare is a weaker specification - why does it achieve a similar capital value rate?
The unit is of a weaker specification, but it is in the same locality as the property and is of a smaller size. I applied a quantum discount as in the industrial market purchasers will pay more pre sq ft on a smaller property.
Why did 11 Wharf road achieve a better CV than the property?
Because it has a better eaves height, it is a detached warehouse on a self contained site and benefits office accommodation.