Carnivora Flashcards
***still have to add pictures from lab
Order Carnivora
IC Eutheria
Suborders: Caniformia, Feliformia
- Carnassial complex P4/m1 for shearing
- Fronto-parietal suture is posterior relative to the post orbital constricture.
- Fused scaphoid, lunate, and centrale bones in the wrist
- Loss of the third trochanter on the femur
Suborder Feliformia
Infraclass Eutheria
Order Carnivora
- Loss or reduction of P1 and M3.
- Double-chambered auditory bullae
Family Felidae
Local spp: Puma concolor, Lynx rufus
IC Eutheria
O Carnivora
sO Feliformia
- Short rostrum
- Dental reduction, particularly molars
- Well-developed carnassial complex
- Postorbital process present
[-Paroccipital process flattened against bullae]
- Retractile claws (except in cheetahs)
- Strong forelimbs that can be rotated palm up
Why is cheetah skull so much lighter than puma skull?
They have different prey: cheetah needs to be able to run very fast to catch savanna ungulates, can’t be weighed down by a large skull (open environment)
How do stripes, spots and other patterns conceal felid predators from their prey?
Break up the outline of the animal
-Felids are stalking predators: must get very close to prey before they deliver a killing bite
Puma concolor
puma, mountain lion, cougar
IC Eutheria
O Carnivora
sO Feliformia
Family Felidae
-light in color
Lynx rufus
bobcat Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder feliformia Family Felidae
Family Hyaenidae
hyaena, aardwolf Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Feliformia -family of extremes -teeth adapted for bone crushing (hyaena = true carnivore) or reduced (aardwolf = myrmecophagous) -large canines
Family Herpestidae
mongoose Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Feliformia -Septum on the auditory bulla is horizontal forming an H shape (see picture) -Nonretractable claws -4-5 digits
How is diet of Herpestids different from that of Felids, and how is that reflected in shape/structure of their teeth?
Herpestids are not as carnivorous as felids –flatter/more bunodont molars –not as much room for temporalis muscle attachment
Family Viverridae
genet, civet Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Feliformia -Septum on the auditory bulla is diagonal forming a V shape (see picture) -Retractable claws -5 digits
How is diet of Viverrids reflected by their tooth structure, as compared to Herpestids and Felids?
Viverrids are not as carnivorous as Felids; more similar to Herpestids -not as much room for temporalis muscle attachment -more bunodont molars
Suborder Caniformia
Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora -Molars and premolars not reduced in number -Large, elaborate baculum
Family Canidae
dogs, foxes, wolves, coyotes Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Caniformia -omnivorous -worldwide distribution -Shearing carnassials -Crushing post-carnassial teeth -Elongate rostrum -Paroccipital processes present -Last upper molar relatively large and transversely elongate
What are the main ways to distinguish skulls of canids and felids?
-shape of skull (canids tend to have longer rostrum) -flatter cheekteeth -last upper molar not as reduced in canids
Canis latrans
coyote Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Caniformia Family Canidae -gray or reddish-gray fur
Vulpes macrotis
kit fox Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Caniformia Family Canidae -temporal ridge forms a V -seasonally carnivorous/omnivorous
Vulpes vulpes
red fox Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Caniformia Family Canidae -temporal ridge forms a V -seasonally carnivorous/omnivorous
Urocyon cinereoargenteus
gray fox Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Caniformia Family Canidae -temporal ridge forms a U -distinct step at posterior end of dentary bone -molars have more surface area = probably related to more omnivorous diet
Urocyon littoralis
island fox Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Caniformia Family Canidae -temporal ridge forms a U -distinct step at posterior end of dentary bone -molars have more surface area = probably related to more omnivorous diet
How can you tell the difference between a dog and coyote skull?
-coyote’s profile should be a flat slope while dog’s profile has inflated frontals (and a more defined forehead) -cranial portion of the skull being more sharply demarcated from the rostral portion
Family Mustelidae
weasel, marten, badger, otter Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Caniformia -Mandibular fossa strongly C-shaped restricting lateral movement -Dorso-ventrally flattened skull -Relatively large, squarish or hourglass-shaped M1 -Short rostrum, long braincase
Mustela erminea
short-tailed weasel or ermine Infraclass Eutheria Order Carnivora Suborder Caniformia Family Mustelidae -Mustela dental formula 3/3, 1/1, 3/3, 1/2
Mustela frenata
long-tailed weasel InfC Eutheria O Carnivora sO Caniformia F Mustelidae -Mustela dental formula 3/3, 1/1, 3/3, 1/2