C7 Flashcards
768
E (2018.Fall 3a.i) 1.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the continuum of rate regulation approaches (2,3,2)
AMC
768
E (2018.Fall 3a.i) 1.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the continuum of rate regulation approaches (2,3,2)
AMC
- ACTIVE regulation (government mandated, prior approval)
- MODERATE rate regulation (file & use, use & file, flex rating)
- COMPETITIVE (file only, open competition)
769
E (2018.Fall 3a.ii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: GOVERNMENT MANDATED
769
E (2018.Fall 3a.ii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: GOVERNMENT MANDATED
- Government sets (Rates, Rate Changes, Risk Classification)
770
E (2018.Fall 3a.iii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: PRIOR APPROVAL
770
E (2018.Fall 3a.iii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: PRIOR APPROVAL
- Government approves (Rates, Rate Changes, Risk Classification) before use
771
E (2018.Fall 3a.iv) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: FILE & USE
771
E (2018.Fall 3a.iv) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: FILE & USE
- Insurer files (Rates, Rate Changes, Risk Classification)
- Regulators have a set period to approve/disapprove otherwise rates can be used (30-90 days)
- Filing docs are simpler than for Prior Approval
772
E (2018.Fall 3a.v) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: USE & FILE
772
E (2018.Fall 3a.v) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: USE & FILE
- Insurer uses (Rates, Rate Changes, Risk Classification) and files with regulators
- Regulators can retroactively change rates within a certain period
773
E (2018.Fall 3a.vi) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: FLEX RATING
773
E (2018.Fall 3a.vi) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: FLEX RATING
- Insurer uses (Rates, Rate Changes, Risk Classification) provided rate changes are WITHIN a certain range
774
E (2018.Fall 3a.vii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: FILE ONLY
774
E (2018.Fall 3a.vii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: FILE ONLY
- Insurer files (Rates, Rate Changes, Risk Classification)
- But NO review or approval is required
775
E (2018.Fall 3a.viii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: OPEN COMPETITION
775
E (2018.Fall 3a.viii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-1 [5] Rate Regulation approaches:Describe the rate regulation approach: OPEN COMPETITION
- No filing required
776
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] intro:Identify the main regulatory concerns for auto insurance (2)
AA
776
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] intro:Identify the main regulatory concerns for auto insurance (2)
AA
- Availability & affordability
777
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] intro:Rate Regulation mechanisms vary by province: (yes/no)
777
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] intro:Rate Regulation mechanisms vary by province: (yes/no)
- Yes
778
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] intro:Which provinces/territories use 1 approach for all required vehicles (5)
778
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] intro:Which provinces/territories use 1 approach for all required vehicles (5)
- NS (prior approval)
- PEI (file & use)
- YK, NV, NWT (open competition)
779
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] intro:Identify external considerations affecting Rate Regulation
reg-MEP
779
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] intro:Identify external considerations affecting Rate Regulation
reg-MEP
- Market cycle, economic conditions, politics
780
E (2018.Fall 3a.ix) 1.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: GOVERNMENT MANDATED
780
E (2018.Fall 3a.ix) 1.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: GOVERNMENT MANDATED
- Alberta GRID, BC
781
E (2018.Fall 3a.x) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: PRIOR APPROVAL
781
E (2018.Fall 3a.x) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: PRIOR APPROVAL
- Ontario major filings
782
E (2018.Fall 3a.xi) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: FILE & USE
782
E (2018.Fall 3a.xi) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: FILE & USE
- PEI
783
E (2018.Fall 3a.xii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: USE & FILE
783
E (2018.Fall 3a.xii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: USE & FILE
- Quebec
784
E (2018.Fall 3a.xiii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: FLEX RATING
784
E (2018.Fall 3a.xiii) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: FLEX RATING
- NOT USED IN CANADA
785
E (2018.Fall 3a.xiv) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: OPEN COMPETITION
785
E (2018.Fall 3a.xiv) 0.000 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 [6] Rate Regulation types:Identify an example of the rate regulation approach: OPEN COMPETITION
- Nunavut, Yukon
786
E (2019.Spring 2a.) 0.250 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 exam:Consistent with provincial regs? BC private insurer files Coll and Comp changes and waits for approval before using rates
786
E (2019.Spring 2a.) 0.250 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 exam:Consistent with provincial regs? BC private insurer files Coll and Comp changes and waits for approval before using rates
- No - Coll & Comp are optional coverages and optional coverages are governed by OPEN COMPETITION
787
E (2019.Spring 2b.) 0.250 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 exam:Consistent with provincial regs? NS must file rates with NC Utility & Review Board within specified period after using rates
787
E (2019.Spring 2b.) 0.250 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 exam:Consistent with provincial regs? NS must file rates with NC Utility & Review Board within specified period after using rates
- No - NS uses PRIOR APPROVAL
788
E (2019.Spring 2c.) 0.250 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 exam:Consistent with provincial regs? QC private insurer uses property damage rates before submitting filing
788
E (2019.Spring 2c.) 0.250 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 exam:Consistent with provincial regs? QC private insurer uses property damage rates before submitting filing
- Yes - QC is USE & FILE
789
E (2019.Spring 2d.) 0.250 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 exam:Consistent with provincial regs? AB acts a monopoly in providing insurance for TNCs
789
E (2019.Spring 2d.) 0.250 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-2 exam:Consistent with provincial regs? AB acts a monopoly in providing insurance for TNCs
- No - TNC is provided by private insurers
790
E (2012.Fall 4b.i) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Benefits to policy holders of switching: Prior Approval -> Use & File - i
rate volatility, rates
790
E (2012.Fall 4b.i) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Benefits to policy holders of switching: Prior Approval -> Use & File - i
rate volatility, rates
- Less Rate Volatility (faster rate updates, lower price swings)
- Lower rates (due to lower filing costs)
791
E (2012.Fall 4b.ii) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Benefits to policy holders of switching: Prior Approval -> Use & File - ii
insurers like it..
791
E (2012.Fall 4b.ii) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Benefits to policy holders of switching: Prior Approval -> Use & File - ii
insurers like it..
- Insurers like use & file:
- If more insurers are operating –> more competition & innovation –> good for consumers
- Regulators can then focus on solvency which protects policy holders (versus worrying about rate approval)
792
E (2018.Fall 3b.) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Identify advantages to flex rating
792
E (2018.Fall 3b.) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Identify advantages to flex rating
- Less volatility in rates (rate changes must be within a specified range)
- Lower expenses (versus prior approval)
793
E (2017.Spring 3a.) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Regulatory approval - which is faster (File & Use vs Prior Approval)
793
E (2017.Spring 3a.) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Regulatory approval - which is faster (File & Use vs Prior Approval)
- Defns:
- File & Use: government has set period to approve otherwise rates can be used
- Prior Approval: must approve before use
- ANSWER:
- File & Use probably faster due to set period of approval
- But can’t be used for all lines of business in all provinces
794
E (2017.Spring 3b.) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Regulatory approval - which is faster (Open Competition vs Prior Approval)
794
E (2017.Spring 3b.) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Regulatory approval - which is faster (Open Competition vs Prior Approval)
- Defns:
- Open Competition: no approval required
- Prior Approval: see (2017.Spring #3a)
- ANSWER:
- Open Competition is faster to market
- Valid only in NU, YK
795
E (2017.Spring 3c.) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Regulatory approval - which is faster (Use & File, File & Use)
795
E (2017.Spring 3c.) 0.500 pts
KPMG.RegOv: All
Qz-3 misc:Regulatory approval - which is faster (Use & File, File & Use)
- Defns:
- Use & File: no approval required but regulators can retroactively change rates
- File & Use: see (2017.Spring #3a)
- ANSWER:
- Usage under Use & File faster since there is no waiting period before use
- Valid only in QC
796
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-1 intro:What is the purpose of A.M. Best’s financial strength ratings
796
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-1 intro:What is the purpose of A.M. Best’s financial strength ratings
- To provide an opinion on the financial strength of an insurer
- (and it’s ability to meet ongoing obligations to policyholders)
797
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-1 intro:What is the BCAR formula
797
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-1 intro:What is the BCAR formula
- BCAR = (AC - NRC) / AC x 100
- (calculated at 4 different VaR levels)
798
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-2 available capital:How is AC (Available Capital) calculated in the BCAR formula
798
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-2 available capital:How is AC (Available Capital) calculated in the BCAR formula
- Start with balance sheet reported capital (surplus)
- Make appropriate adjustments
799
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-2 available capital:Identify adjustments to balance sheet capital to obtain BCAR Available Capital
EDO
799
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-2 available capital:Identify adjustments to balance sheet capital to obtain BCAR Available Capital
EDO
- EDO: lura-sd-fig
- Equity adjustments:
- loss reserves
- unearned premiums
- reinsurance
- assets
- Debt adjustments:
- surplus notes
- debt service requirements
- Other adjustments:
- future operating costs
- intangibles
- goodwill
- Equity adjustments:
800
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-2 available capital:Why don’t we use unadjusted reported capital as the value for AC (Available Capital)
800
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-2 available capital:Why don’t we use unadjusted reported capital as the value for AC (Available Capital)
- Incorporating these adjustments provides for a more economic and consistent view of capital available
801
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:Identify the risk categories in the BCAR model
BICEP-FCR
801
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:Identify the risk categories in the BCAR model
BICEP-FCR
- asset risk:
- (B1) Fixed income securities
- (B2) Equity securities
- (B3) Interest rate risk
- (B4) Credit risk
- U/W/ risk:
- (B5) reserve risk
- (B6) premium risk
- (B8) Catastrophe risk
. other risks:. (B7) Business risk
802
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:What is the purpose of the covariance adjustment in the NRC formula
802
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:What is the purpose of the covariance adjustment in the NRC formula
- Reflects the assumed statistical independence of 7 of the 8 risk components: (B1)-(B6) and (B8)
- (reduces NRC because it’s unlikely that these 7 components will be near their maximum levels simultaneously)
803
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:Why is (B7), Business risk, excluded from the covariance adjustment
803
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:Why is (B7), Business risk, excluded from the covariance adjustment
- A.M. Best expects an insurer to maintain capital for business risks without the benefit of diversification
804
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:In the BCAR model, what is ‘gross required captial’
804
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:In the BCAR model, what is ‘gross required captial’
- Gross required capital = direct SUM of required capital for (B1) through (B8)
- (represents total required capital if all risks developed simultaneously)
805
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:Determine the A.M. Best rating based on the strength assessment table
805
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-3 net required capital:Determine the A.M. Best rating based on the strength assessment table
- Click button with pencil
806
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-4 calculate (B5):What is the key idea in calculating the required capital for each risk category
806
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-4 calculate (B5):What is the key idea in calculating the required capital for each risk category
- Multiply the liability from each risk category by a specific capital factor (similar to MCT)
807
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-4 calculate (B5):Briefly describe how BCAR ‘capital factors’ are derived
807
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-4 calculate (B5):Briefly describe how BCAR ‘capital factors’ are derived
- Derivation of capital factors is:
- Based on industry risk factors
- Then adjusted for company’s volatility in case loss development
808
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-4 calculate (B5):Calculate B5 for BCAR for each VaR level
808
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-4 calculate (B5):Calculate B5 for BCAR for each VaR level
- Click button with pencil
809
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Identify considerations other than BCAR score that impact Best’s balance sheet strength assessment
Cured SALAMI
809
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Identify considerations other than BCAR score that impact Best’s balance sheet strength assessment
Cured SALAMI
- Q2 - SALAMI
- Q2 → Quality of capital, Quality of reinsurance
- –
- Stress testing (how well does the company perform under stress)
- Adequacy of reserves
- Liquidity of capital
- Actions of affiliates (affiliates could drag you down or pull you up)
- Matching of assets & liabilities (this is desirable for paying your bills on time)
- Internal capital models (does the company have a good procedure for assessing its own capital needs)
- Q2 → Quality of capital, Quality of reinsurance
810
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Identify the 6 steps in A.M. Best’s rating process (leading to the final issuer credit rating)
BOB-ECL (analyst for A.M. Best!)
810
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Identify the 6 steps in A.M. Best’s rating process (leading to the final issuer credit rating)
BOB-ECL (analyst for A.M. Best!)
- BOB-ECL
- Balance sheet strength (based mainly on the BCAR scores, but subject also subject to Cured Salami.)
- Operating performance
- Business profile
- –
- Enterprise risk management
- Comprehensive adjustment
- Lift and/or drag
811
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Identify company characteristics that may tend to lower a company’s BCAR score
811
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Identify company characteristics that may tend to lower a company’s BCAR score
- Aggressive investment portfolio (increases NRC for investment risk categories B1, B2, B3)
- Loans to poor creditors or reinsurance with low-rated reinsurers (increases NRC for credit risk category B4)
- Reserve deficiency (increases NRC for reserve risk category B5)
- Excessive growth or high U/W leverage (increases NRC for premium risk category B6)
- Concentration of property risks in Florida (increases NRC for catastrophe risk category B8)
812
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Why does A.M. Best calculate NRC and BCAR at more than 1 level of VaR
insight, tail events
812
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Why does A.M. Best calculate NRC and BCAR at more than 1 level of VaR
insight, tail events
- To gain more insight into the company’s balance sheet strength
- To assess its ability to withstand tail events
813
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Why does A.M. Best use a sensitivity analysis to supplement its BCAR calculation
813
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Why does A.M. Best use a sensitivity analysis to supplement its BCAR calculation
- Assess capital required to support future business
- Assess impact of a pro-forma transaction (acquisition of a subsidiary)
- Assess projected year-end capital position
814
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Identify an aspect of the BCAR model that may make it more robust than MCT
814
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-5 concepts:Identify an aspect of the BCAR model that may make it more robust than MCT
- BCAR model permits qualitative adjustments to final assessment for economic conditions:
- Interest rate changes
- Stage of U/W cycle
- Changes in reinsurance arrangements
815
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-6 BCAR vs MCT:Describe 3 similarities between the BCAR model and MCT
815
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-6 BCAR vs MCT:Describe 3 similarities between the BCAR model and MCT
- Purpose (assess financial strength and ability to meet policyholder obligations)
- Key idea (apply capital factors to liabilities in various risk categories)
- Covariance adjustment (to account for the statistical independence between risk categories)
816
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-6 BCAR vs MCT:Describe 3 differences between BCAR model and MCT
816
BCAR.CDN2018: All
Qz-6 BCAR vs MCT:Describe 3 differences between BCAR model and MCT
- formula is different and:
- †’ BCARmax = 100%, no minimum
- †’ MCTmin = 0%, no maximum
- robustness is different:
- †’ A.M. Best more robust because final assessment includes qualitative economic conditions
- (like stage of U/W cycle)
- time horizon is different:
- †’ BCAR capital must support current & future premium risk
- †’ MCT focuses more on current year’s risk
- formula is different and:
817
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 A (market overview):Why is cat loss a big threat to financial health
cats: SUR
817
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 A (market overview):Why is cat loss a big threat to financial health
cats: SUR
1. Cats are (Significant, Unexpected, Rapid)
818
E (2015.Spring 17a.) 0.500 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 A (market overview):Identify drivers for recent increase in frequency/severity of cats
818
E (2015.Spring 17a.) 0.500 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 A (market overview):Identify drivers for recent increase in frequency/severity of cats
- FREQUENCY: climate change
- SEVERITY: increase in population density & complexity of supply chains
819
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 A (market overview):Identify Best’s expectations for insurers accepting cat risks (2)
manage, absorb
819
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 A (market overview):Identify Best’s expectations for insurers accepting cat risks (2)
manage, absorb
- Insurers must demonstrate ability to:
- MANAGE cat risk
- ABSORB potential losses
820
E (2018.Spring 22a.) 1.000 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 B (ERM):Describe the elements of strong cat risk management (4)
820
E (2018.Spring 22a.) 1.000 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 B (ERM):Describe the elements of strong cat risk management (4)
- Catastrophe modeling:
- Parameter selection is critical
- Use more than 1 model
- Data quality:
- Accurate property location & coding
- Property value & insurance-to-value
- Conduct site reviews (so that information is up-to-date)
- Safeguards to prevent manipulation by customers
- Aggregate loss exposure:
- Use aggregate losses as a secondary test of model
- Monitoring: (MML)
- Measure, Monitor, Limit exposure on a continuous basis
821
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 C (B/S strength):What is a standard BCAR score
821
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 C (B/S strength):What is a standard BCAR score
- A measure of an insurer’s financial strength (includes a component for catastrophes)
822
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 C (B/S strength):What is a stressed BCAR score
822
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 C (B/S strength):What is a stressed BCAR score
- A score that reflects the ability of an insurer to continue operating even after a castastrophe
- Based on natural catastrophe stress test
823
E (2018.Spring 22c.) 1.000 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 C (B/S strength):Identify considerations in adjusting an insurer’s rating based on it’s stressed BCAR score
flexibility, volatility, multiple exposures, risk management
823
E (2018.Spring 22c.) 1.000 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-1 C (B/S strength):Identify considerations in adjusting an insurer’s rating based on it’s stressed BCAR score
flexibility, volatility, multiple exposures, risk management
- Financial flexibility:
- Tolerance is HIGHER if the company is willing & able to replace capital after an event
- Historical volatility
- Tolerance is LOWER if the company has as history of volatile operating performance
- Frequency of severe exposures
- Tolerance is LOWER if the company has multiple exposures to severe events in a single season
- Risk management
- Tolerance is HIGHER if the company has good/experienced risk management
824
E (2017.Spring 23d.) 0.250 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength): what is the purpose of the A.M. Best natural catastrophe stress test
824
E (2017.Spring 23d.) 0.250 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength): what is the purpose of the A.M. Best natural catastrophe stress test
- Test financial condition of insurer after 2 major catastrophe events
825
E (2016.Fall 21b.) 1.250 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength):Describe the steps in the natural catastrophe stress test
surplus, reinsurance, reserves, optional (adjust PMLs)
825
E (2016.Fall 21b.) 1.250 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength):Describe the steps in the natural catastrophe stress test
surplus, reinsurance, reserves, optional (adjust PMLs)
- [1] surplus
- Reduce reported surplus by PML (net post-tax 1-in-100 year event)
- [2] reinsurance
- Increase reinsurance recoverables by at least 40% of ceded PML
- [3] reserves
- Increase reserves by 40% of net PML
- [4] optional
- Adjust PMLs used in cat risk portion of standard BCAR score due to changes in reinsurance structure after 1st cat event
826
E (2019.Spring 18c.) 0.500 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength):How do earthquakes impact BCAR surplus
826
E (2019.Spring 18c.) 0.500 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength):How do earthquakes impact BCAR surplus
- Reduce reported surplus by PML (net post-tax 1-in-100 year event)
827
E (2018.Spring 22b.) 0.500 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength):Reason for testing a 2nd catastrophe event
827
E (2018.Spring 22b.) 0.500 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength):Reason for testing a 2nd catastrophe event
- Insurer still has exposure aft after the first cat
- Including a 2nd cat provides a better assessment of the insurer’s financial condition
828
E (2015.Spring 17c.) 0.500 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength):Compare & contrast testing of cat risk: BCAR v DCAT
828
E (2015.Spring 17c.) 0.500 pts
BCAR.Cat: NEW
Qz-2 C (B/S strength):Compare & contrast testing of cat risk: BCAR v DCAT
- SIMILARITY: both test multiple events
- DIFFERENCE: BCAR tests 2nd non-concurrent event