C1 Flashcards
1
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
(1.1) intro:Define ‘target capital required’ (give the statistical defn)
1
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
(1. 1) intro:Define ‘target capital required’ (give the statistical defn)
* Capital level corresponding to CTE(99%) on the loss distribution over 1-yr time horizon (CTE = Conditional Tail Expectation)
2
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
(1.1) intro:Are insurers required to meet capital requirements at all times
2
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
(1. 1) intro:Are insurers required to meet capital requirements at all times
* YES!
3
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
(1.1) intro:Describe scope of consolidation for MCT
3
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
(1.1) intro:Describe scope of consolidation for MCT
- MCT ratio is calculated on consolidated basis
- Includes: any subsidiary parent could operate directly (Ex: other P&C insurer)
- Excludes: life insurers
4
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
(1.1) intro:What is an easy proxy for CapAv (Capital Available) that appears on the B/S (Balance Sheet)
4
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
(1. 1) intro:What is an easy proxy for CapAv (Capital Available) that appears on the B/S (Balance Sheet)
1. B/S equity
5
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
Qz-1 defns:Define insurance risk
risk of loss..clms..
5
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
Qz-1 defns:Define insurance risk
risk of loss..clms..
- Risk of loss FROM the potential for claims (from policyholders & beneficiaries)
6
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
Qz-1 defns:Define market risk
risk of loss..chgs..
6
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
Qz-1 defns:Define market risk
risk of loss..chgs..
- Risk of loss FROM changes in prices in various markets
7
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
Qz-1 defns:Define credit risk
risk of loss..counter-parties..
7
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
Qz-1 defns:Define credit risk
risk of loss..counter-parties..
- Risk of loss FROM counterparty’s potential INABILITY or UNWILLINGNESS to fully meet contractual obligations due to the insurer
8
E (2016.Fall 18a.) 0.500 pts
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
Qz-1 defns:Define operational risk
risk of loss..processes..
8
E (2016.Fall 18a.) 0.500 pts
MCT 1: OVERVIEW & GEN REQ
Qz-1 defns:Define operational risk
risk of loss..processes..
- Risk of loss FROM inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems or from external events
10
E (2015.Fall 19.) 2.000 pts
MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE
Qz-2 (2.1) CapAv:4 considerations in defining MCT CapAv (Capital Available)
MCT-APAS
10
E (2015.Fall 19.) 2.000 pts
MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE
Qz-2 (2.1) CapAv:4 considerations in defining MCT CapAv (Capital Available)
MCT-APAS
- AVAILABILITY: is the capital element (fully paid) and (available to absorb losses)
- PERMANENCE: until when is a capital element available
- ABSENCE: ask whether a capital element has an absence of (encumbrances) & (mandatory servicing costs)
- SUBORDINATION: is the capital element (subordinated to rights of policy holders and creditors) in (an insolvency or winding-up)
11
MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE
(2.1) CapAv:What are the 3 broad components of capital available (3)
11
MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE
(2.1) CapAv:What are the 3 broad components of capital available (3)
- Category A (common equity)
- Category B
- Category C
12
MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE
(2.2) CapCompLims:When is excess category B & C capital included in capital available (2)
12
MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE
(2.2) CapCompLims:When is excess category B & C capital included in capital available (2)
- (w/ OSFI approval) & (plan to return to compliance ASAP)
- Must be due to event(s) beyond insurer’s control
16
E (2017.Spring 24b.i) 0.500 pts
MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE
Qz-2 supp:Describe impact of unregistered reinsurance on MCT capital available
16
E (2017.Spring 24b.i) 0.500 pts
MCT 2: CAPITAL AVAILABLE
Qz-2 supp:Describe impact of unregistered reinsurance on MCT capital available
- If unregistered reinsurance goes UP then CapAv goes DOWN
- Reduction = max(0, D) WHERE D = (UEP + O/S + ReIns Recv) - (ReIns Pay + NOD + LOC) SUMMED over all reinsurers separately
17
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.2) margins:On what basis should claims and premium be put before calculating capital required for insurance risk
17
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.2) margins:On what basis should claims and premium be put before calculating capital required for insurance risk
- The data should be NET of (reinsurance, salv/sub, SIRs) and EXCLUDE (PfADs)
18
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.3) ReIns:What is the $-limit on LOC (Letters of Credit) for obtaining capital credit against unregistered reinsurance
18
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.3) ReIns:What is the $-limit on LOC (Letters of Credit) for obtaining capital credit against unregistered reinsurance
- LOC limit = 30% x (UEP ceded + O/S recoverable)
25
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Define ‘earthquake premium reserve’ (EPR)
25
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Define ‘earthquake premium reserve’ (EPR)
- Voluntary accumulation of earthquake premiums (must not exceed PML500)
26
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:If earthquake premium is implicit in total premium, what must the insurer demonstrate
reasonableness of allocation..
26
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:If earthquake premium is implicit in total premium, what must the insurer demonstrate
reasonableness of allocation..
- Demonstrate reasonableness of premium allocation to earthquake coverage
27
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:When can EPR be reduced (2)
27
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:When can EPR be reduced (2)
- When there is material decrease in eqk-X
- To establish a (claims, LAE) provision post-event
28
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Is EPR included in reserve amounts on B/S
28
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Is EPR included in reserve amounts on B/S
- Yes
29
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
(4.5) Cats:What is the formula for MCT capital required for nuclear reserves
29
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
(4. 5) Cats:What is the formula for MCT capital required for nuclear reserves
* Nuclear reserve = NWP x 1.25 (may reverse after 20 years UNLESS there is credible data not to do so)
30
E (2019.Spring 18b.) 1.000 pts
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Explain the impact on MCT components of a decrease in ER (Earthquake Reserves)
30
E (2019.Spring 18b.) 1.000 pts
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:Explain the impact on MCT components of a decrease in ER (Earthquake Reserves)
- Need only 4 items for 1.0 pts:
- Capital available doesn’t change
- Capital required for insurance risk decreases
- Capital required for market risk doesn’t change
- Capital required for credit risk depends on use of unregistered reinsurance for earthquakes
- Capital required for operational risk decreases (because insurance risk decreases)
31
E (2018.Fall 26d.) 0.250 pts
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:True or false: MCT takes into account flood risk
31
E (2018.Fall 26d.) 0.250 pts
MCT 4: CAPITAL REQUIRED: INSURANCE RISK
Qz-3 (4.5) Cats:True or false: MCT takes into account flood risk
- It could be both true & false:
- Flood risk would be part of general insurance risk (if it were sold)
- But flood is not currently given special consideration like earthquake
34
MCT 6:CAPITAL REQUIRED: CREDIT RISK
Qz-5 (6.2) Off B/S Items:What are some examples of off-B/S sheet exposures (4)
34
MCT 6:CAPITAL REQUIRED: CREDIT RISK
Qz-5 (6.2) Off B/S Items:What are some examples of off-B/S sheet exposures (4)
- Structured settlements
- NOD (Non-Owned Deposits)
- LOC (Letters of Credit)
- Derivatives
35
MCT 6:CAPITAL REQUIRED: CREDIT RISK
(6.2) Off B/S Items:General method for CapReq(off-B/S): + problem
CRX x RF
35
MCT 6:CAPITAL REQUIRED: CREDIT RISK
(6.2) Off B/S Items:General method for CapReq(off-B/S): + problem
CRX x RF
- CapReq = (CrdRsk exposure x RskFctr) | Problem: face amount of off-B/S exposure (may not reflect) true CrdRsk exposure
36
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 general:Is legal risk included in operationl risk? (yes/no)
36
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 general:Is legal risk included in operationl risk? (yes/no)
- Yes, legal risk is included as part of operational risk
37
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 general:List 2 types of risk that are EXCLUDED from MCT operational risk (2)
37
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 general:List 2 types of risk that are EXCLUDED from MCT operational risk (2)
- Strategic risk
- Reputation risk
38
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 general:What is the purpose of the cap on operational risk of 30% x CR(0), where CR(0) = Sum (ins, mkt, crd) risk
38
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 general:What is the purpose of the cap on operational risk of 30% x CR(0), where CR(0) = Sum (ins, mkt, crd) risk
- To dampen operational risk for high-volume, low-complexity businesses that have high levels of reinsurance
39
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 general:What is rapid premium growth linked to (3)
39
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 general:What is rapid premium growth linked to (3)
- Mergers
- New LOBs
- Changes to products or U/W criteria
40
E (2017.Spring 24b.iii) 0.500 pts
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 supp:Impact of unregistered reinsurance on MCT OpnRsk
40
E (2017.Spring 24b.iii) 0.500 pts
MCT 7:CAPITAL REQUIRED: OPERATIONAL RISK
Qz-6 supp:Impact of unregistered reinsurance on MCT OpnRsk
- When unregistered reinsurance goes UP –> CapReq(OpnRsk) goes UP
- OpnRsk DEPENDS on InsRsk & CrdRsk
- InsRsk goes UP because unregistered reinsurance is one of its components
42
E (2016.Fall 18c.) 0.500 pts
MCT 8: DIVERSIFICATION CREDIT
Qz-7 (8.1) DivsCrd:Define ‘diversification credit’
42
E (2016.Fall 18c.) 0.500 pts
MCT 8: DIVERSIFICATION CREDIT
Qz-7 (8.1) DivsCrd:Define ‘diversification credit’
- A reduction to capital required RECOGNIZING that not all risk categories are likely to suffer maximum loss simultaneously
43
E (2018.Fall 26b.) 0.250 pts
MCT 8: DIVERSIFICATION CREDIT
Qz-7 (8.1) DivsCrd:Does the diversification credit consider correlation between & within all risk components
43
E (2018.Fall 26b.) 0.250 pts
MCT 8: DIVERSIFICATION CREDIT
Qz-7 (8.1) DivsCrd:Does the diversification credit consider correlation between & within all risk components
- No:
- Credit & market risk are summed to get asset risk
- Then the diversification credit considers the correlation between asset & insurance risk
55
E (2017.Spring 19b.) 0.500 pts
MCT SUPP: OTHER EXAM PROBLEMS
supp:Describe a non-modeled approach to calculating eqk reserves
55
E (2017.Spring 19b.) 0.500 pts
MCT SUPP: OTHER EXAM PROBLEMS
supp:Describe a non-modeled approach to calculating eqk reserves
- Use the ‘standard’ approach:
- Calc ERX = [max(EastCan.PTIV, WestCan.PTIV) - deduc], where PTIV = Property Total Insured Value
- THEN calc ER (Earthquake Reserve) the same way as in the modeled approach
56
E (2015.Fall 18a.) 0.500 pts
MCT SUPP: OTHER EXAM PROBLEMS
Qz-8 supp:Purpose of establishing a supervisory target MCT (3)
56
E (2015.Fall 18a.) 0.500 pts
MCT SUPP: OTHER EXAM PROBLEMS
Qz-8 supp:Purpose of establishing a supervisory target MCT (3)
- Early warning for management
- Threshold for OSFI intervention
- Accounts for (all risks in MCT ratio) + (non-modeled risks, off-B/S risks) + MARGIN
69
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 intro:What is the purpose of MfADs (Margins for Adverse Deviations)
to reflect..
69
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 intro:What is the purpose of MfADs (Margins for Adverse Deviations)
to reflect..
- To reflect a degree of uncertainty inherent in an actuarial best estimate
70
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 intro:What are some broad methods for calculating MfADs (2)
deterministic, stochastic
70
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 intro:What are some broad methods for calculating MfADs (2)
deterministic, stochastic
- Deterministic: select percentages directly based on knowledge of the situation
- Stochastic: use quantile methods based on a statistical analysis
71
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 defns:What is the technical defn of MfAD (Margin for Adverse Deviation)
difference between.. assumption..
71
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 defns:What is the technical defn of MfAD (Margin for Adverse Deviation)
difference between.. assumption..
- Difference between (ASSUMPTION for actual calculation) and (ASSUMPTION for best estimate calculation)
72
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 defns:What is the technical defn of PfAD (Provision for Adverse Deviation)
difference between.. result..
72
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 defns:What is the technical defn of PfAD (Provision for Adverse Deviation)
difference between.. result..
- Difference between (RESULT of actual calculation) and (RESULT of best estimate calculation)
- The best estimate might be the median of your loss distribution
- The actual calculation would be more conservative, maybe the 90th percentile, the difference being the PfAD amounts
73
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 defns:Categories of MfADs (3)
73
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 defns:Categories of MfADs (3)
- Investment return rates
- Development on claims
- Recovery on losses ceded to reinsurer
74
E (2019.Spring 24b.) 1.000 pts
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 good RskMarg traits:According to IAIS, when should a risk margin generally be HIGHER/lower (4,1)
information, freq/sev, contract term, loss distribution
74
E (2019.Spring 24b.) 1.000 pts
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
Qz-1 good RskMarg traits:According to IAIS, when should a risk margin generally be HIGHER/lower (4,1)
information, freq/sev, contract term, loss distribution
- Risk margin should be HIGHER:
- When less is known about the estimate
- For low frequency / high severity LOBs
- For longer contract terms
- When there is a wide probability distribution for the losses
- Risk margin should be LOWER:
- With emerging experience
76
E (2017.Fall 27error2.) 0.750 pts
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
calc:What is the formula for calculating PfAD for reinsurance ceded
76
E (2017.Fall 27error2.) 0.750 pts
CIA.MfAD 01-04: INTRODUCTION
calc: What is the formula for calculating PfAD for reinsurance ceded
* PfAD(re) = MfAD(re) x PV(ceded unpaid losses)
77
E (2019.Spring 24a.i,ii) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 intro:Deterministic (lower, UPPER) % limits on MfADs (3)
77
E (2019.Spring 24a.i,ii) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 intro:Deterministic (lower, UPPER) % limits on MfADs (3)
- Investment return rate ( 25 bps , 200 bps )
- Claims development ( 2.5% , 20% )
- Reinsurance recovery ( 0% , 15% )
78
E (2016.Spring 29b.i) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Identify CATEGORIES of considerations for selecting MfAD(clms) (3)
ODL
78
E (2016.Spring 29b.i) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Identify CATEGORIES of considerations for selecting MfAD(clms) (3)
ODL
- Operations (U/W, claims management, other)
- Data (on which estimate is based)
- LOB
79
E (2016.Spring 29b.i) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Identify OPERATIONAL considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -> (when to pick HIGH/low)
low(SSC), high(op Changes, Turnover, Lack of Guidelines)
79
E (2016.Spring 29b.i) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Identify OPERATIONAL considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -> (when to pick HIGH/low)
low(SSC), high(op Changes, Turnover, Lack of Guidelines)
- Pick HIGH when there are (operational changes, employee turnover, Lack of Guidelines, inadequate staffing)
- Pick LOW when operations are (Stable, Strong, Consistent)
80
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Identify DATA considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -> (when to pick low)
low(SCH)
80
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Identify DATA considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -> (when to pick low)
low(SCH)
- Pick LOW when data is
- Stable
- Credible
- Homogeneous
81
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Identify LOB considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -> (when to pick low)
S
81
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Identify LOB considerations in selecting MfAD(clms) -> (when to pick low)
S
- Pick LOW when LOBs are “stable”
82
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Reasons to select highest MfAD(clms) margin of 20% (3)
tort.new.(+retention)
82
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Reasons to select highest MfAD(clms) margin of 20% (3)
tort.new.(+retention)
- For significant changes: (tort reform, legal challenges)
- For a new LOB in new province with limited data
- For an increase in retentions with limited data for assessing effect
83
E (2019.Spring 24a.iii) 0.250 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Reasons to select MfAD(clms) higher than 20% (3)
cons3
83
E (2019.Spring 24a.iii) 0.250 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Reasons to select MfAD(clms) higher than 20% (3)
cons3
- If there is unusually high uncertainty
- If PfAD is already very low because best estimate of claims liability is very low
- If a stochastic analysis indicates variability not identified using a deterministic analysis
84
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Reasons to select lowest MfAD(clms) margin of 2.5% (3)
comm.StrucSett.stoploss
84
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(clms):Reasons to select lowest MfAD(clms) margin of 2.5% (3)
comm.StrucSett.stoploss
- LOB commuted to reinsurer and is in runoff
- LOB has pre-set payments (Ex: structured settlement)
- Insurer has stop-loss coverage reserved at stop-loss limit
86
E (2016.Spring 29b.ii) 1.000 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(re):Identify considerations in selecting of MfAD(re) (3)
LR.unreg.FinCond
86
E (2016.Spring 29b.ii) 1.000 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(re):Identify considerations in selecting of MfAD(re) (3)
LR.unreg.FinCond
- Consider ceded Loss Ratio (if high: pick MfAD high)
- Consider proportion of unregistered reinsurance (if high: pick MfAD high)
- Consider financial condition of reinsurer (if poor: pick MfAD high)
89
E (2017.Spring 25c.) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(inv):Identify considerations in selecting MfAD(inv) (3)
CFmch.P-Pat.AssRsk
89
E (2017.Spring 25c.) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(inv):Identify considerations in selecting MfAD(inv) (3)
CFmch.P-Pat.AssRsk
- MATCHING of cash flows from assets & liabilities (if unmatched: pick MfAD high)
- ERROR in estimating payment patterns (if uncertain: pick MfAD high)
- ASSET risk (credit/default & liquidity) (if high risk: pick MfAD high)
90
E (2019.Spring 24a.iv) 0.250 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(inv):When may MfAD(Inv) < 25 bps
90
E (2019.Spring 24a.iv) 0.250 pts
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(inv):When may MfAD(Inv) < 25 bps
- When the best estimate of the discount rate (based on insurer’s assets) is already below 25 bps
92
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(inv):Formula-based deterministic approaches (2)
92
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
Qz-2 MfAD(inv):Formula-based deterministic approaches (2)
- Weighted formula
- Explicit quantification
93
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
MfAD(inv):Weighted formula method
93
CIA.MfAD 05: EXPLICIT ASSMPS - DETERMINISTIC MfADs
MfAD(inv):Weighted formula method
- MfAD(inv) = iPM - iAM
- iAM = min [iPM, iRFM x (1-k)]
97
CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting
Qz-4 docs:What should be disclosed in MfAD docs
97
CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting
Qz-4 docs:What should be disclosed in MfAD docs
- For explicit assumptions: how margins were selected
- For stochastic analysis: describe components modeled as random variables, with their distributions & parameters
98
CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting
Qz-4 docs:Rule of thumb for level of detail to include in MfAD docs (i)
98
CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting
Qz-4 docs:Rule of thumb for level of detail to include in MfAD docs (i)
- Strike balance between (too little, too much)
- Considering what (qualitative, quantitative) info best serves user’s (understanding, decision-making)
99
CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting
Qz-4 docs:Rule of thumb for level of detail to include in MfAD docs (ii)
SIC
99
CIA.MfAD 11: Documentation & Reporting
Qz-4 docs:Rule of thumb for level of detail to include in MfAD docs (ii)
SIC
- Sophistication of user
- Importance of concept to user
- Complexity of concept
- NOTE: cross-reference with materiality paper
100
E (2018.Fall 26a.) 0.250 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
Qz-5 supp:In general, would MfADs be the same for claim & premium liabilities
100
E (2018.Fall 26a.) 0.250 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
Qz-5 supp:In general, would MfADs be the same for claim & premium liabilities
- No, claim & premium liabilities have different risk profiles
104
E (2015.Fall 26b.) 0.250 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
Qz-5 supp:What is the difference between PV & APV (Present Value & Actuarial Present Value)
104
E (2015.Fall 26b.) 0.250 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
Qz-5 supp:What is the difference between PV & APV (Present Value & Actuarial Present Value)
- PV: accounts only for the time value of money
- APV: accounts for the time value of money AND includes a risk margin for (investment return, claims development, reinsurance recovery)
105
E (2016.Fall 24a.) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
Qz-5 supp:Is APV always smaller than the undiscounted liabilities
105
E (2016.Fall 24a.) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
Qz-5 supp:Is APV always smaller than the undiscounted liabilities
- NO: it depends on the balance between the discount factor (which decreases APV) & the MfADs (which increase APV)
109
E (2015.Spring 19c.) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
supp:In general, what are possible choices for selection of ceded discount rate
109
E (2015.Spring 19c.) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
supp:In general, what are possible choices for selection of ceded discount rate
- Risk-free rate
- Rate used by reinsurer to discount the same liabilities
113
E (2014.Fall 21a.) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
supp:Identify some risks not explicit in calculation of policy liabilities or MCT capital required (5)
SRFI.ID
113
E (2014.Fall 21a.) 0.500 pts
CIA.MfAD SUPP:
supp:Identify some risks not explicit in calculation of policy liabilities or MCT capital required (5)
SRFI.ID
- Strategic
- Reputational
- Fraud
- Innovation
- International development
- NOTE: CAS answer seemed to include several ‘normal’ risks
129
E (2016.Spring 18b.) 0.500 pts
CCIR.ARINSTR: All
Qz-1 general:Define ‘non-deferrable commission’
commissions..relating/varying..hence
129
E (2016.Spring 18b.) 0.500 pts
CCIR.ARINSTR: All
Qz-1 general:Define ‘non-deferrable commission’
commissions. .relating/varying..hence
* Commissions not exclusively RELATING TO and VARYING with the acquisition of premium HENCE not recoverable over the term of the unexpired policy
130
E (2013.Fall 21b.) 0.250 pts
CCIR.ARINSTR: All
Qz-1 general:Ways of accounting for time value of money in calculating excess (deficiency) ratio
130
E (2013.Fall 21b.) 0.250 pts
CCIR.ARINSTR: All
Qz-1 general:Ways of accounting for time value of money in calculating excess (deficiency) ratio
- Explicitly calculate investment income and add to excess amount
- Discount the undiscounted amounts (back to the SAME POINT IN TIME) to reverse effects of discounting
131
E (2013.Fall 23a.) 0.750 pts
MSA.RATIOS: All
Qz-3 intro:Give examples of company characteristics not captured in MSA ratios (4)
131
E (2013.Fall 23a.) 0.750 pts
MSA.RATIOS: All
Qz-3 intro:Give examples of company characteristics not captured in MSA ratios (4)
- Subjective analysis of market position
- Quality of management
- Quality of reinsurance
- Prospects for growth & innovation
132
E (2013.Fall 23c.) 0.500 pts
MSA.RATIOS: All
Qz-3 intuition:What does diversification score measure
132
E (2013.Fall 23c.) 0.500 pts
MSA.RATIOS: All
Qz-3 intuition:What does diversification score measure
- Measures how closely the insurer tracks the overall Canadian market (in terms of geographic & LOB spread)
- If diversification score > 65 –> company is highly diversified
133
MSA.RATIOS: All
Qz-3 intuition:Give examples of an insurer with a low/high diversification score
133
MSA.RATIOS: All
Qz-3 intuition:Give examples of an insurer with a low/high diversification score
- Low: niche insurers
- High: national, multi-line writers
156
E (2015.Spring 26c.) 0.500 pts
MSA.RATIOS: All
Qz-3 calc:Compare the MSA ratios: ROE ROR
156
E (2015.Spring 26c.) 0.500 pts
MSA.RATIOS: All
Qz-3 calc:Compare the MSA ratios: ROE ROR
- Just give formulas & intuition:
- ROE: return to SHs per unit of capital
- ROR: income relative to revenue-generating capacity
162
E (2018.Spring 12a.iii) 0.250 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 intro:Objective of FA (Facility Association)
ensure..for..unable
162
E (2018.Spring 12a.iii) 0.250 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 intro:Objective of FA (Facility Association)
ensure..for..unable
- ensure auto insurance availability
- For..
- all owners & licensed drivers
- Who are..
- unable to obtain coverage through the voluntary market
163
E (2018.Spring 12a.i) 0.000 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 intro:Description of FA (who created FA, etc..)
created by..non-profit..
163
E (2018.Spring 12a.i) 0.000 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 intro:Description of FA (who created FA, etc..)
created by..non-profit..
- Created by insurance industry
- (unincorporated, non-profit) of (ALL auto insurers)
164
E (2018.Spring 12a.ii) 0.000 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 intro:Mission of FA
administer, enhance stability, minimize market share
164
E (2018.Spring 12a.ii) 0.000 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 intro:Mission of FA
administer, enhance stability, minimize market share
- Administer residual market mechanisms
- Enhance MS (market stability) through RSPs
- Minimize MS (market share), so consumers benefit from private mkt
165
E (2019.Spring 8a.) 0.750 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Types of risk-sharing mechanisms administered by FA (3)
165
E (2019.Spring 8a.) 0.750 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Types of risk-sharing mechanisms administered by FA (3)
- FARM (Facility Association Residual Market)
- RSPs (Risk-Sharing Pools)
- UAF (Uninsured Automobile Fund)
166
E (2017.Spring 7a.ii) 0.250 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Key purpose of FARM
..minimize market share
166
E (2017.Spring 7a.ii) 0.250 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Key purpose of FARM
..minimize market share
- Provide coverage for risks that cannot be placed privately (also, FARM seeks to minimize market share)
167
E (2017.Spring 7a.i) 0.250 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Key purpose of RSP
market stability
167
E (2017.Spring 7a.i) 0.250 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Key purpose of RSP
market stability
- Enhance market stability by allowing insurers to pool bad risks that have passed their own U/W criteria
- (premiums & losses are shared)
168
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Key purpose of UAF
..(no,inadeq)..
168
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Key purpose of UAF
..(no,inadeq)..
- Provide compensation in cases of (no, inadequate) insurance
169
E (2019.Spring 8b.) 0.750 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Where does FA operate its various mechanisms
169
E (2019.Spring 8b.) 0.750 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:Where does FA operate its various mechanisms
- FARM: everywhere except provinces with public auto (BC,MB,SK,QC)
- RSP: (ON, AB, NS, NB), note that Quebec operates its own RSP, called PRR
- UAF: Atlantic Provs
170
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:FARM - what are servicing carriers
170
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-1 org:FARM - what are servicing carriers
- Member companies contracted by FA to issue/administer policies and adjust claims
171
E (2017.Fall 13a.) 1.500 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-2 org:(FARM, RSP) areas of operational differences (6)
RA(CC)(P.claims)
171
E (2017.Fall 13a.) 1.500 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-2 org:(FARM, RSP) areas of operational differences (6)
RA(CC)(P.claims)
- RA(CC)(P.claims): memory trick - read it as ‘RACK-P dot Claims’
- R: rates
- A: admission
- C: customer knowledge
- C: # customers placed
- P: participation ratio
- Claims: U/W & claims admin
172
E (2018.Spring 12b.i) 0.500 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-2 org:(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - rates
172
E (2018.Spring 12b.i) 0.500 pts
FA.DUTIL: ALL
Qz-2 org:(FARM, RSP) operational differences regarding - rates
- FARM: rates set by FA
- RSP: uses rates of ceding company