C3: Third party rights in Land Law Flashcards
In registered land, when does a person become the legal owner?
Registered: Estates and interests do not become legal estates or legal interests until registration takes place. Until registration at HMLR these remain equitable interests.
In unregistered land, when does a person become the legal owner?
Unregistered: With unregistered land, the buyer becomes the legal owner immediately upon completion.
What are the three main third party rights others can have over your land?
- Easements (e.g. right to drive over land)
- Covenants (e.g. limit on business purposes)
- Mortgages (legal charge over land)
What is an easement?
An easement is a property right which one person has over another person’s land, e.g. rights of way, rights to run cables.
What are the following parties known as?
Party who benefits from easement.
Party whose land suffers the detriment/burden.
- The dominant owner
- The servient owner
Are easements public or private rights?
Easements are private rights.
Which case sets out the characteristics for easements?
Re Ellenborough Park [1956]
What are the four characteristics that must be satisfied for easements?, established by Re Ellenborough Park (1956)?
- Must be a dominant and servient tenement.
- Right claimed must benefit the dominant tenement. (i.e. would it make the land more valuable?)
- Must be diversity of ownership and/or occupation. (different people must own/occupy the tenements, landlord/tenant is ok as occupation is sufficient)
- Right claimed must be capable of forming the subject matter of a grant. These must be written and meet the following requirements:
a) must be similar to existing easements
b) no positive requirement for the servient owner to expend money (except maintaining fences)
c) must be sufficiently definite
d) no exclusive possession
What is the difference between a licence, a grant and a reservation of easements?
Licence: A mere licence is not an easement. In order to create an easement, there must be a grant or reservation.
E.g. If Barry allowed a neighbour access across the garden of Sunnybank for the delivery of building materials, he will not have created an easement. Even though this permission has all the hallmarks of an easement, it cannot be an easement as it is merely verbal and amounts to mere permission to enter. It would be viewed as a licence to cross the land.
Grant: A grant occurs where one person agrees that another should have rights over land which they retain
Reservation: A reservation occurs where a person reserves rights over land which they sell.
What is the difference between an “express”, “implied” and “presumed” grant?
There are three ways of granting or creating a legal easement:
- Express Grant
Agreed via deed and equivalent to legal estate (for by law) or via writing (for equitable easement)
- Implied Grant
Claimant has the burden of proving the existence of the easement.
If implied by court or conveyance, the court will declare that the easement exists and it’ll be deemed to be a legal easement even if not in deed or written down. (Necessity, Common intention, rule in Wheeldon v Burrows, S62 LPA 1925)
- Presumed grant or prescription
Prescription is when someone can prove that they have exercised a right that has the characteristics of an easement for a long time (usually 20 years).
What are the 4 methods of implied grant?
There are various methods of implied grant, based on what the parties to the agreement are presumed to have intended:
a) Necessity (if absolutely necessary, e.g. landlocked)
b) Common intention (if both parties clearly intended this)
c) The rule in Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] (when land is divided and a part is sold on, any rights the seller still needs must be expressly reserved for the seller. Otherwise all easements that are ‘continuous and apparent’ will pass to the buyer of the land by implication.
d) S62 LPA 1925 (rights are transferred from seller to new owner on a sale of part. The right must have been in actual use at the time of the sale.’
For easements to be implied by prescription, what are the four conditions?
(a) There must have been continuous user (the legal term for usage): the purported easement must have been used regularly.
(b) User must have continued for the prescriptive period – generally 20 or more years.
(c) User must be by, or on behalf of, and against, the fee simple (i.e. freehold). In other words, one freehold owner must be claiming against another. A tenant cannot acquire an easement by prescription over land adjoining their leasehold land if that neighbouring land is owned by their landlord.
(d) There must be user as of right. This means that it must have been exercised without force, secrecy or permission. Where a person forcibly removes a fence to create a shortcut, or where the servient owner does not appreciate that their land is being used (e.g. where drains are buried under the land), no right of prescription can arise. Also, if permission has been given to use the particular right, then there can be no prescriptive right.
What are the three different methods of prescription?
(i) At common law, for an easement to arise by prescription, it had to have been enjoyed since time immemorial (1189). The courts have adopted the rule that, if user as of right for 20 years or more is shown, it will be presumed that user has continued since 1189. If it can be shown that at any time since 1189 the easement could not have existed, for example, the land was owned by one person, an easement cannot be acquired by prescription at common law.
(ii) Under the doctrine of lost modern grant, where the easement must have been used for 20 years. In such cases, the courts may make a (fictional) presumption that the easement was granted, but that the deeds were lost.
(iii) Under the Prescription Act 1832, where the easement must have been used for at least 20 years. If 40 years’ user can be shown, however, the right is deemed to be absolute and indefeasible (cannot be made void).
To claim an easement under the doctrine of lost modern grant, the 20-year period can be any period, whereas to claim an easement under the Prescription Act 1832, the 20-year period must be “next before action”, that is, run for the 20 years immediately preceding the action.
How is a “reserved” easement different to a “grant” of one?
A reserved easement is when a seller reserves rights on part of their land that they are selling. A grant is between two freeholders.
Are reserved easements equitable or legal?
Reserved easements can be equitable OR legal.
What are the options if an express reservation does not exist?
If there is not an express reservation over the easement by deed, the only options are to imply the easement by means of necessity or common intention. The rule in Wheeldon v Burrows and s62 LPA 1925 do not apply to reservation of easements, because the seller should have made it clear in the contract when selling the part.
Which two situations do not apply to a reserved easement but do apply to a grant?
Wheeldon v Burrows
S62 LPA 1925
I.e. no easement ruling in favour of the seller.
What are “profits à prendre”?
A profit à prendre is a right to enter on to land of another person and take part of the produce or soil. Unlike an easement, the owner of the profit does not need to have an estate in the land itself. Profits include mining rights, fishing rights, shooting rights, rights of grazing, and rights to collect wood or dig for peat.
Profits can be acquired in similar ways to easements, although they cannot be acquired by necessity or under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows [1879]. The prescription period under the Prescription Act 1832 is usually 30 years.
Identify the three ways in which an easement can be terminated.
(1) By statute.
(2) By release. This could be express release or implied release. There has to be an intentional abandonment of the easement for there to be an implied release.
(3) By unity of ownership and possession. If the dominant and servient tenements come into the ownership and possession of the same person, any easement is extinguished.
What is a covenant?
A covenant is a promise (i.e. obligation) which governs what must be done or not done in relation to the land affected by it.