Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation (Disruption of Attachment) Flashcards

1
Q

define maternal deprivation

A

the emotional / intellectual consequences of separation between a child and their mother/ mother substitute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

From Bowlby’s belief that continuous care from mother/ substitute is essential in normal development, what did he suggest would occur if this lacked?

A

He believes that if a child’s attachment bond is disrupted (deprived) before the end of the critical period (2.5 years), there would be developmental damage in the form of intellectual, emotional and social issues e.g delinquency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Bowlby state mother love is as important to?

A

‘mother love in infancy and childhood is as important for mental health as are vitamins and proteins for physical health’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the difference between separation and deprivation?

A

deprivation occurs when an infant is separated from their PAF, and no one replaces this care.
However, separation is when you are not with your PAF, and that you’re not suffering from deprivation if the care is substituted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the period for deprivation damage and if the damage occurred what were the two areas Bowlby suggested would be delayed?

A

0 - 2.5 years of age
but can still occur up to 5 years of age
Delay the child’s intellectual / emotional development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Skeels + Dye (1939) track and find that supports Bowlby’s ‘ Maternal Deprivation ‘ theory?

A

they tracked IQs, using IQ tests, of children who had been placed in an orphanage.
Found that their IQs were exceptionally low.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Skodak + Skeels (1949) do, regarding orphans?

A

They placed children from an orphanage who had low IQs into a house for the mentally retarded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

After what length of time had Skodak + Skeels (1949) seen a difference in the IQs scores of the children in the home, what were the results and what caused this?

A

After 1 1/2 years, the IQs had increased from 64 to 92 (80 - 120 being normal)
The increase occurred due to having better emotional care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What do the results from Skodak + Skeel’s (1949) study regarding the orphan child suggest about separation?

A

Suggests that separation from the PAF may damage IQ but the negative effects can be reversed with later care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Supporting Skodak + Skeels, what did Goldfaub (1947) find regarding children’s IQs?

A

Found lower IQ in children who had remained in institutions, compared to those who had been fostered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who did Bowlby conduct a study on in 1944, and what did he find, regarding separation?

A

He conducted a study on 44 child criminals.
He found most of them had been separated from their PAF for significant periods of their childhood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Bowlby find regarding the 44 thieves and who was this compared to?

A

Compared to 44 control children who weren’t thieves, Bowlby found that the 44 thieves had much higher levels of PAF separation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the three things that the 44 young criminals showed?

A

-low levels of affection for others
-low levels of shame
-low feelings of responsibility for their actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Bowlby state about the minority of the 44 young criminals?

A

’ some were affectionless psychopaths, who had significantly been damaged due to the lack of a PAF’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the main issue with Bowlby’s ‘ Maternal Deprivation’ issue?

A

he conducted interviews on the 44 criminal boy’s families before he observed them, so he may have known who would’ve displayed problem behaviour.
This influences bias and beta bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Rutter (1981) refute against Bowlby’s ‘Maternal Deprivation’ theory ?

A

he criticised that he didn’t differentiate between deprivation and privation.

17
Q

What is the difference between deprivation and privation?

A

Deprivation - having a PAF and then being separated without a substitute
Privation - never having an attachment with a PAF at all.

18
Q

What did Rutter find privation to be and why is this an issue with Bowlby’s theory?

A

He found it to be far worse and that the children probably suffered from privation and not deprivation.
This means the results/ theory aren’t correct for deprivation.

19
Q

What two things did Rutter suggest Bowlby overstated in his 44 thieves study?

A
  • Seriousness and damage caused by deprivation.
20
Q

Who did Lewis (1954) try to replicate Bowlby’s 44 thieves study with and what happened?

A

He replicated it with 500 youths and failed to find the same results, due to there being no association between early separation + later psychopathy.

21
Q

What link did Gao et al. (2010) find between early separation of infants from PAF and psychopathy as an adult?

A

found there was a link, found by other researchers too, where separation + neglect is linked with later increased chances of dangerous psychopathy.

22
Q

Why do researchers have to be careful when applying the ‘maternal deprivation’ theory? provide examples.

A

as the true explanation may be more complicated.
e.g evidence psychopathy could be linked to faulty genes, and that childhood neglect augments it.

23
Q

What is involved within Koluchova’s (1976) czech twin study, that indicates an issue for the critical period for psychological development proposed by Bowlby?

A

Two twins, Andrei and Vanya experienced severe physical / emotional abuse from 18 months of age to 7 years.
e.g locking in cupboard and given no comfort/ love

24
Q

What happened when the czech twins were rescued and what do these findings suggest about Bowlby’s critical period?

A

They were placed in foster care, were they were loved and cared for.
They went on to develop normally.
This suggests Bowlby’s critical period is incorrect, and may be better as a sensitive period were damage isn’t permanent.